Critically analyse the theory and practice of designing, delivering and evaluating local Health promotion projects.

Critically analyse the theory and practice of designing, delivering and evaluating local Health promotion projects.

It is about the THEORY and PRACTICE of designing, delivering and evaluating health promotion projects

This is NOT a descriptive essay, do NOT give lots of description about the PRECED-PROCEED model e.g. do not describe the steps, assume the reader/markers knows
the model well.

2. Read widely and early, think deeply and for a period of time, and synthesise the ideas you come across and demonstrating your ability to think strategically.
3. Cite Them Right Harvard citing and referencing is very important, poor referencing will affect your mark.
4. Stick to the word limit, only the first 1000 words will be read.
6. Do not give a list of definitions or long definitions, assume we know what the definitions are for all the concepts mentioned in the learning outcomes. For example you can briefly discuss types of stakeholders – primary and secondary and what they are - but do not need to define what a stakeholder is.

Introduction (sources and evidence can be cited where appropriate) 50-75 words
• What is discussed in the essay and why systematic and structured planning and implementation (designing and delivering) projects is important in public health. Critically analyse the theory and practice of designing, delivering and evaluating local Health promotion projects.


Body of Essay/Main Section (sources and evidence must be cited) 825-875 words
• Critically discuss the use of planning and implementation models such as the Precede Proceed model. For example, there are lots of different planning models, Precede-proceed is a complex model, Explain 2-3 elements of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model with one or more examples of real/realistic health promotion projects [LO1] Critically analyse the theory and practice of designing, delivering and evaluating local Health promotion projects.
• Critically discuss the general kinds of partners and stakeholders involved in a public health programme/project, what roles they can play (commissioners, funders, partners in delivery, beneficiaries), and the resources (time, money, people, expertise) that partners/other stakeholders can bring to designing and delivering programmes/projects. [LO2]
• Briefly discuss the importance of quality (what it is, and why it is important) and refer to the
quality models such as, for example, Maxwell, Donabedian. [LO3]
• Briefly discuss what is commissioning and the value of communication (e.g. marketing) in
delivering programmes/projects (See core reading list, references in lectures and p.293 of
Naidoo and Wills, 2016). [LO3]
• Briefly discuss the how the success of the programme/project will, alongside other key factors, partly depend on good team working; and the factors that lead to successful team-working.

Conclusion (sources and evidence can be cited where appropriate) 75-100 words
Wrap up your discussion with some thoughts about:
• Briefly, give your perspective on the value of planning models in supporting the design and delivery of health promotion projects.