Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the organisation’s reward strategy recommending how this might be revised to more effectively attract and retain employees.
7HR03 Strategic Reward Management
7HR03 Strategic Reward Management
Student Assessment Brief
Assessment ID / CIPD_7HR03_24_01
Level 7 Advanced Diploma in
Strategic People Management
Introduction
Your knowledge and understanding of the material covered in this specialist unit will be assessed through your answers to the four questions listed below.
You will write four answers of approximately 1000 words to the questions posed and submit them together in a single document. This constitutes your assessment for this unit. The total word count for the assessment will therefore be 4000 words, plus or minus 10%. The bibliography, list of references and essential appendixes (if applicable) are not included in the total word count – but the latter must be kept to a minimum.
You must demonstrate within the submitted evidence (through headings and sub-headings) which learning outcomes and assessment criteria have been cited. We are unable to moderate your work if this is not included.
As this is an Advanced Diploma, it is important that you are able to demonstrate not only good knowledge and understanding of the material associated with each learning outcome, but also the ability to develop an original argument and justify it persuasively with reference to wider reading. Examples of approaches taken in a range of organisations are also an effective means by which to justify your arguments.
The six main criteria that CIPD requires centres to use when marking your assessment are outlined below, but it may be that not all these criteria are present in every question.
(1) focus
(2) depth and breadth of understanding
(3) strategic application and professional advice
(4) research and wider reading
(5) persuasiveness and originality
(6) presentation and language
Assessment questions
Level 7 Advanced Diploma
As a part of the selection process for an internal promotion you have been given the following brief:
Businesses continue to operate under a backdrop of economic instability, and many regions are experiencing a cost-of-living crisis. The latest CIPD reward management survey (2022) reports ‘that some employers are making a much valued difference to the financial wellbeing of their workforce; others are falling short of employees’ expectations’.
To explore this further you are required to prepare answers to the following questions for discussion at a forthcoming interview.
For the purpose of this assessment, you need to apply your answers to either your own organisation or one with which you are familiar.
It is essential that your reading of the published literature is used to inform your responses to all questions.
Question 1 (AC 1.4)
Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the organisation’s reward strategy recommending how this might be revised to more effectively attract and retain employees.
Question 2 (AC 2.4)
Evaluate the concepts of universal benefits as opposed to flexible ‘cafeteria’ style benefits, recommending which approach would be most suited to the organisational context. Justify your recommendations.
Question 3 (AC 3.2)
Analyse the advantages and disadvantages of using incremental pay scales within organisations, explaining why these would/would not be appropriate to your organisation.
Question 4 (AC 4.3)
Examine the potential ethical issues associated with the use of contingency forms of reward within the organisation.
Marking Grid
Level 7 Advanced Diploma
The student will receive a Pass, Merit, Distinction or Refer/Fail result at unit level. Assessors must provide a mark from 1 to 4 for each Learning Outcome in the unit.
To pass the unit assessment the student must achieve a 2 (Pass) or above for each of the learning outcomes.
The overall mark achieved will dictate the grade the student receives for the unit, provided NONE of the learning outcomes have been failed or referred.
Overall mark
Unit result
0 to 7
Refer / Fail
8 or 9
Pass
10 to 13
Merit
14 to 16
Distinction
The student results should be recorded in a marking grid similar to the example below.
Marking grid:
Learning outcome
Mark
LO1
2
LO2
3
LO3
3
LO4
2
Overall mark
10
Unit Result
Merit
Generic grade descriptors
REFER/FAIL / 1
PASS / 2
MERIT / 3
DISTINCTION / 4
Focus
Fails to address all the questions either sufficiently fully or directly.
An adequate attempt to address all the questions fully and directly.
A good attempt to address all the questions relatively well and directly.
An excellent attempt to address all the questions very well and directly.
Depth & breadth of understanding
Inadequate knowledge and understanding in respect of one or more of the questions. Limited depth and breadth of analysis.
Adequate knowledge and understanding across the questions. Satisfactory breadth and depth of analysis.
Full and solid knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Good breadth and depth of analysis.
Very full knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Excellent breadth and depth of analysis.
Strategic application & professional advice
Fails to provide appropriate or well-justified advice and/or recommendations. Lacks a strategic approach.
Provides adequately justified advice and informed recommendations Some strategic application.
Provides solid and thoughtful advice and well-informed recommendations. Clearly strategic in orientation.
Provides excellent advice and very well-informed recommendations. Strategically oriented in all respects.
Research & wider reading
Limited original research and/or appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Limited or no referencing.
Evidence of sufficient research and appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Satisfactory in- text referencing.
Evidence of significant research and thoughtful, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. A good standard of in-text referencing.
Evidence of considerable research and excellent, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. An excellent standard of in-text referencing
Persuasiveness & originality
Limited development of persuasive and original arguments. Inadequate use of examples.
An adequate attempt to develop original arguments and to justify these persuasively. Includes appropriate examples.
Some strong original arguments are presented which are mainly justified persuasively. Good use of examples.
Mostly strong original arguments are presented and justified very persuasively. Excellent use of examples.
Presentation & language
An inadequate standard of presentation or language. The assignment is poorly written and/or poorly structured. It is not at the level required for a management presentation.
A solid standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are satisfactory for a management presentation.
A strong and professional standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are well crafted for a management presentation.
An outstanding standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are very well crafted for a management presentation.
Sample Answer - Plagiarised
Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the organisation’s reward strategy recommending how this might be revised to more effectively attract and retain employees.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Organisation`s Reward Strategy
The organisation`s reward strategy plays a pivotal role in attracting and retaining talent, particularly in the current context of economic instability and a cost-of-living crisis. A critical evaluation of its effectiveness reveals both strengths and areas for improvement.
Current Effectiveness
Alignment with Employee Needs: A well-designed reward strategy considers employees` financial, professional, and personal well-being. However, the CIPD Reward Management Survey (2022) indicates that while some employers have succeeded in supporting financial well-being, others fall short of expectations. The organisation’s reward strategy should be evaluated against employee feedback and market benchmarks to assess its alignment with needs such as competitive salaries, benefits, and non-financial rewards.
Internal Equity and External Competitiveness: The organisation must ensure fairness within its pay structures and competitiveness in the labour market. If employees perceive inequities or if remuneration lags behind industry standards, engagement and retention may decline. This is particularly critical in sectors facing skills shortages or high turnover.
Focus on Holistic Well-being: Reward strategies that extend beyond financial incentives to include health benefits, flexible working, career development, and recognition schemes are more likely to foster loyalty. A lack of attention to these dimensions could undermine morale and productivity.
Agility and Responsiveness: During periods of economic uncertainty, organisations that proactively adapt their strategies to address challenges such as inflation and rising living costs stand out. For instance, offering one-time cost-of-living allowances or increasing base salaries can help mitigate financial stress for employees.
Recommendations for Improvement
To enhance the organisation`s reward strategy and ensure it effectively attracts and retains employees, the following revisions are recommended:
Introduce Cost-of-Living Adjustments: Implement regular salary reviews and adjustments linked to inflation rates. Offering allowances to offset rising living costs can directly address employee financial well-being concerns.
Expand Non-Financial Rewards: Emphasise benefits such as career development opportunities, enhanced mental health support, and flexible work arrangements. For example, providing access to training and mentoring schemes can improve employee engagement and long-term retention.
Continued...
Get Fresh Answer: £129 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, tailored to your instructions