AC 1.1 Evaluate the importance of performance and engagement with followers in an organisation
MARK SHEET
Developing Your Leadership Styles
Centre Number:
078781
ILM ref:
8607-406
Learner Registration No:
Learner Name
Learner named above confirms authenticity of submission.
ILM uses learners’ submissions – on an anonymous basis – for assessment standardisation. By submitting, I agree that ILM may use this script on condition that all information which may identify me is removed.
However, if you are unwilling to allow ILM use your script, please refuse by ticking the box: □
Learning Outcome 1: Understand the outcomes of effective leadership
Assessment Criteria (AC)
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
AC 1.1
Evaluate the importance of performance and engagement with followers in an organisation
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
The importance of only performance or only engagement with followers in an organisation has been evaluated
The importance of performance and engagement with followers in an organisation has been evaluated but the evaluation has been based on inappropriate criteria or is incomplete
The importance of performance and/or engagement with followers in an organisation has been merely described or stated with no evaluation to provide conclusions or recommendations
The importance of performance and engagement with followers in an organisation has been evaluated using a subjective or partial evidence base to provide limited conclusions or recommendations
The importance of performance and engagement with followers in an organisation has been evaluated using a wide range of objective evidence to provide meaningful, comprehensive and appropriate conclusions or recommendations
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
Learning Outcome 2: Be able to assess own leadership styles
Assessment Criteria (AC)
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
AC 2.1
Review own leadership styles by using a diagnostic
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
Own leadership styles are not reviewed by using a diagnostic, or the diagnostic is inappropriate, or the outcomes of the review are insufficient to provide a meaningful judgement
Leadership styles are reviewed by using a diagnostic to form a meaningful judgement, although the review is limited in detail or depth
Leadership styles are reviewed by using a diagnostic to form a meaningful and comprehensive judgement with good detail and depth
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
AC 2.2
Assess the effectiveness of own leadership styles
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
The effectiveness of own leadership style is not assessed, or the assessment is inappropriate, or leadership styles are merely described with no assessment as to their effectiveness
The effectiveness of own leadership styles is assessed, yet the evidence base for the assessment is mainly subjective and/or the assessment criteria are limited or unclear
The effectiveness of own leadership styles is assessed using a wide and objective evidence base and clear criteria
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
Learning Outcome 3: Understand the implications of own leadership styles for self and for leadership within own organisation
Assessment Criteria (AC)
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
AC 3.1
Using the self-assessment of own leadership styles activity described in assessment criteria 2.1 and 2.2, evaluate the implications for self and own organisation
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
Implications for self and/or own organisation are not evaluated, or the evaluation is inappropriate, or the implications are evaluated without correctly using the self-assessment of own leadership styles activity
Implications for self or organisation are evaluated, but not both
Implications are merely described with no evaluation to provide conclusions or recommendations
The implications for both self and own organisation are evaluated making limited use of the self-assessment of own leadership styles activity to provide meaningful but limited conclusions or recommendations
The implications for both self and own organisation are evaluated making full use of the self-assessment of own leadership styles resulting in meaningful, comprehensive and appropriate conclusions and recommendations
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
AC 3.2
Evaluate the impact of changes in the situation on the effectiveness of the adopted style
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
The impact of changes in the situation on the effectiveness of the adopted style is not evaluated, or the impact is merely described with no evaluation to provide a meaningful conclusion or recommendations
Only one change in the situation is evaluated or the changes in situation are unclear or too similar to be able to draw meaningful conclusions or recommendations
The impact on the effectiveness of the adopted style of two or more appropriate changes in the situation is evaluated to provide limited conclusions or recommendations, although the evidence base employed may be largely subjective or partial
The impact on the effectiveness of the adopted style of two or more appropriate changes in the situation is evaluated using a wide range of objective evidence to produce appropriate conclusions or recommendations
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
Learning Outcome 4: Be able to assess own leadership behaviour, in terms of the factors which determine effective leadership
Assessment Criteria (AC)
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
AC 4.1
Evaluate the factors which impact on leadership effectiveness
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
The factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness are not evaluated, or only one factor is evaluated, or the factors are merely described with no evaluation to provide a meaningful conclusion or recommendations
Two or more factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness are evaluated to provide limited conclusions or recommendations, although the evidence base employed may be largely subjective or partial
Two or more factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness are evaluated using a wide range of objective evidence to produce appropriate conclusions or recommendations
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
AC 4.2
Assess own leadership behaviour in terms of these factors
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
Own leadership behaviour is not assessed in terms of the factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness, or the assessment is inappropriate, or leadership behaviour is merely described with no assessment using appropriate criteria to make a judgement
Own leadership behaviour is assessed in terms of the factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness to provide a judgement, although the evidence base for the assessment is mainly subjective and/or the assessment criteria are limited or unclear
Own leadership behaviour is assessed in terms of the factors which impact upon leadership effectiveness using a wide and objective evidence base and clear criteria to provide a well-reasoned judgement
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
Learning Outcome 5: Understand how to develop own leadership style and effectiveness
Assessment Criteria (AC)
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
AC 5.1
Produce an action plan for developing own leadership style and effectiveness
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
An action plan for developing own leadership style and effectiveness is not produced, or is produced for only leadership style or effectiveness, but not for both
An action plan is produced for developing both own leadership style and effectiveness including priorities and timescales
An action plan is produced for developing both own leadership style and effectiveness including priorities, timescales, resources, and responsibilities
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
AC 5.2
Explain the benefits of implementing the action plan
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
The benefits of implementing the action plan are not explained or are simply described or listed
Two or more benefits of implementing the action plan are explained in reasonable detail
Two or more benefits of implementing the action plan are fully explained
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
AC 5.3
Explain how you will monitor and evaluate the action plan
Referral
Pass
Good Pass
An explanation is given of how only monitoring or only evaluation of the action plan is to be undertaken
A clear explanation of how the action plan is to be monitored and evaluated is given
A detailed explanation of the techniques to be used to monitored and evaluated action plan is given
Assessor feedback on AC
PASS / REFERRAL
Assessor Decision
Overall Outcome
PASS / REFERRAL
Overall Comments
Signature of assessor
Date
Quality Assurance
Outcome
PASS / REFERRAL
Comments
Signature of IQA
Date
Get Fresh Answer: £129 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, tailored to your instructions