Privatization of Police Services in India

Dissertation

Case Study: Privatization of Police Services in India

Table of Contents

1 Chapter 1: Introduction. 5

1.1 Background and Context 5

1.2 Research Problem.. 6

1.3 Research aim.. 7

1.4 Research Questions and Objectives. 7

1.4.1 Research Objectives. 7

1.4.2 Research Questions. 7

1.5 Significance of the Study. 7

1.6 Structure of the Dissertation. 8

2 Chapter 2: Literature Review.. 9

2.1 Introduction. 9

2.2 Theoretical Framework. 9

2.3 Global Perspectives on Police Privatization. 12

2.4 Gaps in the Literature. 14

2.5 Summary. 15

3 Chapter 3: Methodology. 16

3.1 Introduction. 16

3.2 Research Design. 16

3.3 Research Philosophy. 16

3.4 Research Approach. 17

3.5 Research Strategy. 17

3.6 Research Choice. 18

3.7 Time Horizon. 18

3.8 Data Collection Method. 19

3.9 Data Analysis Method. 19

3.10 Ethical Considerations. 21

3.11 Limitations of the Methodology. 21

3.12 Summary. 22

4 Chapter 4: Results. 23

4.1 Introduction. 23

4.2  Indian Context 23

4.3 Theme 1: Operational Efficiency. 25

4.3.1 Privatization of police services in India. 25

4.3.2 Response times. 26

4.3.3 Resource Management 26

4.3.4 Infrastructure Improvements. 26

4.3.5 Comparative Insights from Other Countries. 27

4.4 Theme 2: Public Accountability and Trust 27

4.4.1  Public Perception and Trust 27

4.4.2 Accountability in Indian Police Services. 28

4.4.3 Comparison of Public Satisfaction Rates. 29

4.5 Theme 3: Political Interference vs. Corporate Influence. 30

4.6 Summary. 31

5 Chapter 5: Discussion. 33

5.1 Introduction. 33

5.2 Operational Efficiency: Does Privatization Offer Improvements?. 33

5.2.1 Resource Management and Infrastructure Challenges. 33

5.2.2 Response Times and Geographic Disparities. 34

5.2.3 Cost Efficiency and Long-Term Implications. 35

5.2.4 Profitability vs. Public Safety Concerns. 35

5.2.5 Balancing Efficiency and Public Value. 35

5.3 Public Accountability and Trust: A Matter of Perception?. 36

5.3.1 Public Accountability in Traditional Police Services. 36

5.3.2 Challenges of Accountability in Privatized Police Services. 37

5.3.3 Transparency and Regulation in Privatized Policing. 37

5.3.4 International Case Studies on Privatization and Accountability. 37

5.3.5 Impact of Privatization on Public Trust 38

5.4 Political Interference vs. Corporate Influence: Which is Worse?. 39

5.5 Implications for Policy and Future Research. 40

5.6 Summary. 41

6 Chapter 6: Conclusion. 42

6.1 Restatement of Research Aim and Questions. 42

6.2 Summary of Key Findings. 42

6.3 Recommendations. 44

6.3.1 Policymakers. 44

6.3.2 Regulatory Framework. 44

6.3.3 Further Research. 45

6.4 Concluding Thoughts. 45

7 References. 46

1 Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Background and Context

The current state of police services in India is marked by several significant challenges, primarily due to resource constraints and structural inefficiencies. As of 2022, India`s police-public ratio is alarmingly low, with only 152.8 police officers per 100,000 people, compared to the UN`s recommended standard of 222 officers per 100,000. This shortfall has resulted in an overburdened police force, where each officer is responsible for a disproportionately large population segment. Moreover, the police force in India is not only understaffed but also faces severe vacancies, with 24% of positions within state police forces remaining unfilled as of 2023. States like Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka have some of the highest vacancy rates, at 50% and 36%, respectively (Shekhar, 2024)​. These issues are further compounded by outdated infrastructure and a lack of modern technology, which severely limit the police`s ability to handle complex crimes such as cyber fraud, economic offenses, and organized crime. A 2023 report captured that 30. For instance, only five percent of the police surveillance vehicles in use are substandard and seventy-five percent shortage of weaponry in some of the states especially Rajasthan (Kulshreshtha, 2020). The police also suffer from a colonial legacy governance structure which is governed by the Police Act of 1861 that was meant to establish a force rather than a service-oriented institution. This antiquated structure together with political influence, has reduced the confidence of the public in the police to a very low of only 25% of Indians having confidence in their local police (McKay, 2019).

 Privatisation in public services, particularly police services has been a much debated issue in India in relation to enhancing efficiency and performance. The idea of privatization in India started picking up during the economic liberalization in early 1990s. These reforms included the liberalization of the state owned enterprises such as telecommunication, aviation, and energy leading to enhanced services, competition and customer satisfaction. For instance, the privatization of the telecommunications sector resulted in the enhancement of tele-density from 0. From 8 percent in 1994 to over 91 percent by the year 2020 (Human Rights Watch, 2023). Within the boundaries of police services, privatization is understood as the transfer of certain non-core activities (traffic control, patrol and investigative actions) to private structures. This approach can help to free some of the present workload of the police and enable them to attend to other very important duties of the law enforcement. However, this model has brought the following issues on accountability, the high risks of corruption, and the ethical issue of delegating the responsibility of protecting the public to private players (Meerts, 2019). The lessons learnt from other countries that have privatized police functions have been rather ambiguous; while they have experienced some gains in efficiency, there are still problems with trust and equality of access to justice. Consequently, the privatization of police services in India may present solutions to some of the existing problems but this has to be done cautiously so that the important principles of policing justice, equality and public accountability are not violated.

1.2 Research Problem

​ India’s traditional police services face significant structural and operational challenges, which severely impact their efficiency. A key issue is chronic understaffing, with the sanctioned strength of 181 officers per 100,000 people falling short at just 156 officers per 100,000 (Banerjee et al., 2021). States like Bihar and West Bengal struggle with even higher vacancy rates, further hampering law enforcement capabilities. Many police stations lack modern amenities, with 30% still without communication networks and 20% without proper transportation (Ahirrao and Khan, 2021). Outdated equipment also limits their response effectiveness. Additionally, political interference, rooted in the colonial-era Police Act of 1861, continues to undermine the police’s impartiality and effectiveness, as reforms such as the 2006 Model Police Act have seen minimal progress (Ullah, 2024). These factors collectively weaken the overall functioning of law enforcement in India.Top of FormBottom of Form

1.3 Research aim

The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of privatizing police services in India, focusing on effectiveness, efficiency, and public perception, and to assess whether privatization can address the challenges of understaffing, outdated infrastructure, and political interference within the country’s traditional law enforcement system.

1.4 Research Questions and Objectives

1.4.1 Research Objectives

• To evaluate the effectiveness of privatized police services in comparison to traditional public police services, with a focus on crime prevention and resolution outcomes.
• To assess the operational efficiency of privatized police services, particularly regarding response times, resource allocation, and overall service delivery.
• To analyse public perception of privatized police services, exploring factors such as trust, accountability, and overall satisfaction with law enforcement.

1.4.2 Research Questions

1. How does the effectiveness of privatized police services compare to traditional public police services in terms of crime prevention and resolution?
2. What impact does the privatization of police services have on operational efficiency, including response times and resource management?
3. How is public perception of law enforcement influenced by the privatization of police services, particularly in terms of trust and accountability?

1.5 Significance of the Study

The privatization of police services in the backdrop of contending problems apt for the Indian police. It has been seen that indicators like lack of human resource, poor infrastructure, and political meddling affect the conventional police services in India negatively making them less efficient and less credible. This is in a country whose population is over 1 billion people and this means that a big number of people are affected since many people use compute devices. Such inefficiencies can lead to major lacunas in the delivery of policing services particularly within the urban areas that are characterised by high crime rates (Huchhanavar, 2020). Privatisation therefore presents a probability of finding solution to these predicaments through efficiency, accountability and innovation occasioned by competition and management practices of the private sector. If similar advantage can be achieved in the process of privatization of police force then privatization is the best solution. This research is useful for today’s circumstance because India is on the verge of turning into one of the largest urbanized societies in the world and to ensure the functionality and productivity of the police services in such a setting (Huchhanavar, 2020). The finding of this study has important policy and future research implications for the further development of the research. Therefore, results of the present study on the impact, cost and acceptability of the privatized police services may help in deciding the future of policing in India. The policymakers could use the findings to create the mechanisms, which can illustrate the possibility of the privatization and cannot infringe the right of accountability and justice for all members of the society(Jha and Vipul Mudgal, 2022).

1.6 Structure of the Dissertation

This dissertation offers a thorough analysis of the potential impact of privatizing police services in India. Chapter one introduces the topic, outlining the background, research problem, objectives, and significance of the study, while setting the context for exploring privatization as a potential solution to challenges in traditional police services. Chapter two reviews existing literature, analysing global case studies and theoretical frameworks related to the privatization of public services, identifying gaps relevant to the Indian context. Chapter three describes the research methodology, including design, data collection, and analysis methods, while addressing ethical considerations. Chapter four presents the research findings, comparing the effectiveness and public perception of privatized versus traditional police services. Finally, chapter five summarizes the findings, discusses policy implications, and offers recommendations for a balanced approach to privatization in India`s police services.

2 Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

The literature review highlights the theoretical approaches and international experiences of the privatization of police services. The chapter explores the theoretical framework of public administration including classical model by Weber, New Public Management (NPM), Public Value Theory and the privatization models of Principal-Agent Theory and Public Choice Theory. These frameworks offer some understanding of how privatization of police services can lead to the improvement of the service delivery and reduced costs, yet reveal concerns of accountability and fairness. The chapter also explores various international case studies. The literature review reveals the shortcomings of the previous research, especially its lack of focus on the Indian environment.

2.2 Theoretical Framework

Rodrigo Cetina Presuel and Martinez (2023) in a study found out that, public administration theories are the foundation of identifying the functions of the government as well as in the provision of services such as police services. The classical model of public administration based on the Weber’s model relies on the bureaucratic organizational model where public employees work in asystem with a clear chain of command and strict set of rules and regulation (Rodrigo Cetina Presuel and Martinez, 2023). This model is intended to help introduce accountability, maintainability, and neutrality to the public services delivery, including in the police work. Nevertheless, this strategy has been called into question for being too structurally and less flexible in a way that would help meet the ever changing demands of today’s society (Rodrigo Cetina Presuel and Martinez, 2023).

 As stated by Funck and Karlsson (2019) the NPM theory was developed in the late 20th century due to the identified shortcomings of the classic public administration. NPM promulgates the adoption of certain business management principles in the public domain, including efficiency, effectiveness and customer orientation (Funck and Karlsson, 2019). This approach has therefore given rise to more discussion on privatization and contracting out of public services such as police services in the hope that competition and market forces will lead to improved results. NPM theory holds that it is possible to improve the performance of public services by getting rid of the bureaucracy, and by introducing market mechanisms to make the services more efficient and cheaper (Funck and Karlsson, 2019).

 Abdulkareem and Mohd Ramli (2021) however, noted that another important theoretical framework that can be adopted is the Public Value Theory which embraces and goes a notch higher than the efficiency and effectiveness by creating value for the public domain. Mark Moore’s theory called the Public Value Theory is an extension of the new public management theory which asserts that public managers should strive to generate outputs that are beneficial for the society rather than focusing on efficiency in service delivery (Abdulkareem and Mohd Ramli, 2021). From the analysis of this theory in the context of policng it is possible to note that even when discussing such concepts as privatization of services as a way of improving the service delivery, it is crucial to ensure that the public trusts the police, fairness is observed, and the rule of law is followed (Abdulkareem and Mohd Ramli, 2021).

Moore and Vining (2023) noted that the privatization theories mainly focus on the notion of ownership or management of public services by the private sector with an aim of enhancing the efficiency, innovation and responsiveness of the service delivery systems. The concept of Privatization can be best explained by the Principal-Agent Theory whereby the government (principal) outsources service delivery to a private entity (agent) (Moore and Vining, 2023). This theory suggests the advantages of privatization that include; reduced costs and enhanced efficiency in service delivery resulting from competition and profit seeking by private organizations. But it also highlights some of the problems which include the likelihood of lowered accountability and possible goal conflict between the government and private actors (Moore and Vining, 2023).

 Volejníková and Kuba (2020) identified that there is one more theory to mention and that is the Public Choice Theory which uses economic approach in political science and public administration. This theory suggests that the individuals in the government organizations will act in their own self-interest and may result in inefficiencies and bureaucratic growth (Volejníková and Kuba, 2020). Public Choice Theory, therefore, recommends privatization as a mechanism of eliminating these inefficiencies through the competitive market forces and the resultant demPOWERment of government bureaus. From the perspective of police services, this theory posits that the privatisation can help solve such problems as corruption, inefficiency, and bureaucratic rigidity by offering new providers and competition (Volejníková and Kuba, 2020).

 Lastly as pointed out by Paul (2023) the Property Rights Theory argues that distribution of property rights affects economic behavior and results. In the public sector, because property rights are not well defined, the public managers have no reason to cut costs or coming up with new strategies since they will not benefit from it financially as it is the case in private sector (Paul, 2023). Privatization is hence beneficial as it transfers property rights to private firms which helps in optimizing use of resources and reducing inefficiency. This theory is of importance in the discussion on the privatisation of police services since it indicates that private actors who are motivated by profit will have higher incentives to search for better ways of delivering services than public actors who operate under different constraints (Paul, 2023).

 This is for the reason that Bishop (2019) explained that there are theories of law enforcement that explain the goals and the issues in policing in the society. The Social Contract Theory, best explained by such philosophers as Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a theory which states that people give up some of their liberties to the state in order to gain protection and stability. This theory is the foundation of the contemporary police system where the state is given the authority to have the monopoly of force in the society for the maintenance of law and order (Bishop, 2019).

Ren, Zhao and He (2017) further stated that the Broken Windows Theory which was proposed by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling posited that order must be maintained and low-level offenses dealt with so as to prevent higher-level offenses. This theory has been implemented in policing strategies across the globe whereby the policemen should be seen and act on the minor offenses to prevent the occurrence of crime In the light of privatization, this theory raises a very critical issue on how much private entities can enforce social norms and nurture public order without violating justice as well as equity principles (Ren, Zhao and He, 2017).

 According to works of Abramovaite et al. (2022), the Deterrence Theory proposed in the classical criminology states that certainty of punishment, severity of punishment, and promptness of punishment are the major factors that help in preventing crime. Law enforcement is therefore considered as having a very crucial role in the reduction of criminal activities (Abramovaite et al. , 2022). This theory also stresses the need for private police forces which are to be privatized should be able to effectively deter crime and at the same time should be answerable to the public justice system (Abramovaite et al. , 2022).

2.3 Global Perspectives on Police Privatization

According to Byrne, Kras and Marmolejo (2019) noted that the idea of the privatization of the police services has been discussed and practiced in various parts of the world and the results have been mixed. In the United States, private security companies are not new to the overall law enforcement system. Private policing has many manifestations including security officers in gated communities, private detectives and companies that offer investigation services (Byrne, Kras and Marmolejo, 2019). Most especially, the use of private security has expanded faster than the public police in the United States and private security personnel are now about three times more than public police officers. This has raised different questions about the efficiency and responsibility of private security actors, especially given various cases of human rights abuses especially fatal shootings by the private security guards (Byrne, Kras and Marmolejo, 2019).

 Mansaray et al. (2022) has also highlighted that in the United Kingdom for instance, privatization has also been felt particularly through the use of public-private partnerships where the private firms are allowed to offer some services that were hitherto provided by the police in the society. Some of the examples include outsourcing of back-office functions like IT, administrative functions; management of custodial services, non- emergency call center services among others (Mansaray et al. , 2022). These efforts have been made to relive the workload of the public police and to let them concentrate on the traditional policing functions. However, the critics have opposed these efforts stating that outsourcing erodes the publicness of the police and may result in low levels of accountability (Mansaray et al. , 2022).

 Stuurman (2020) identified South Africa as another country where privatised policing has been on the rise especially due to the shortcomings of the public police. This is because of the high cases of crime and the perceived inefficiency of the public police in protecting them which has forced the rich to seek the services of private security companies (Stuurman, 2020). Over the past few years, South Africa has been ranked as having one of the biggest private security industries globally with the number of private security personnel being more than the public police officers. This has however ensured a certain degree of safety to those who can pay for it and in the process has compounded the already existing social inequities given that private security is beyond the reach of many (Stuurman, 2020).

As Venegas (2023) pointed out, in Latin America and more specifically in Brazil and Mexico, privatization has evolved in a different manner whereby private security companies are used to guard firms and gated communities. Such countries have highly theatrical and violent police forces which are also corrupt thus requiring private security (Venegas, 2023). These efforts have however not been without controversy, private security forces in these regions have been accused of human rights abuses and have usually been unaccountable (Venegas, 2023).

 Brogaard and Helby Petersen (2021) have pointed out that where and how police services have been contracted out to private entities has led to divergent outcomes in different contexts and with different governance structures and different roles assigned to the private actors. With regard to efficiency, it has been observed that privatization has led to better and specialized services that are more efficient than the traditional public services, particularly in areas that include asset protection, corporate security, and crime prevention in private domains (Brogaard and Helby Petersen, 2021). For example, in the United States, private security companies have been said to have lowered crime rates in some high-risk places through offering specific services that the public police could not afford to offer owing to resource limitations (Brogaard and Helby Petersen, 2021).

 According to Harris, Smith, and Obara (2019) another area that have demonstrated privatization effectiveness is efficiency. This has been made possible through contract policing where non-core functions are outsourced to private firms thus enabling the public police forces in countries such as the UK to concentrate on frontline policing. This has enhanced the reaction time and the efficiency of resources management (Harris, Smith and Obara, 2019). Nevertheless, the positive impacts may be offset by the costs where some studies show that the overall costs of outsourcing may be higher in the long-run especially where contracts are not properly managed or where private providers do not meet the required levels of service (Harris, Smith and Obara, 2019).

 As noted by Nøkleberg (2019) public opinion towards privatized police services is divided and is a function of the degree of connection of these services to the public order. In the UK, where the privatization process has been well controlled, people’s confidence in privatized utilities is still fairly high, but issues of accountability are still raised from time to time (Nøkleberg, 2019). On the other hand, in countries like South Africa and Brazil where the private security has been able to complement the ineffective public police, the perception gap is very obvious. The afforders of the private security regard them as a complement to the public police while the deprived communities look at them as a sign of oppression and depravation from the central policing services (Nøkleberg, 2019).

2.4 Gaps in the Literature

The literature on police privatization in India is limited, with most studies focusing on Western models that may not suit India`s unique socio-political challenges, such as the caste system, regional disparities, and political interference (Abdulkareem and Mohd Ramli, 2021). While there is research from countries like South Africa and Latin America on privatization`s impact on social inequality, such analysis is lacking in the Indian context, where privatization might widen the gap between rich and poor in terms of security access (Banerjee et al., 2021). Additionally, there is little empirical research on the efficiency of private security services in India, especially in terms of public trust and crime control (Brogaard and Helby Petersen, 2021). This paper aims to fill these gaps by examining police privatization within India`s socio-political framework. Other countries are mentioned to highlight potential issues that could arise in India, given similar challenges. (Funck and Karlsson, 2019).

2.5 Summary

This chapter reviews key theoretical frameworks on public administration and privatization, including Weber’s bureaucratic model, NPM, Public Value Theory, and privatization models like Principal-Agent Theory and Public Choice Theory. These theories provide a foundation for understanding the potential impacts of privatizing police services. The chapter also examines global perspectives, with case studies from the different countries, highlighting the mixed outcomes of privatized policing, such as improved efficiency but increased social inequity. The literature review identifies gaps in research, particularly the lack of studies exploring how privatization could affect vulnerable groups and law enforcement in India, emphasizing the need for further analysis in this context.

3 Chapter 3: Methodology

3.1 Introduction

This chapter provides a description of the research method that was used to investigate the privatization of police services in India with a view of establishing a qualitative research design. This paper uses secondary thematic analysis to examine the possible effects of privatization as opposed to the conventional public police. The study uses the Research Onion model that provides a step by step approach to research including philosophy, strategy and methods. A qualitative approach is taken with an interpretivist research philosophy as this allows for the examination of the participants’ perceptions and experiences. With a view to developing new theoretical propositions, the study has an inductive research design; however, to have a context on the possible impacts and opportunities of PPPs in the police services in India, secondary data from literature and policies were collected.

3.2 Research Design

This research work uses a qualitative research design with a secondary thematic analysis to analyze how the privatization of police services can enhance law enforcement than the conventional public funded police services. The decision to use thematic analysis is because it offers the best methods for identifying, analyzing and reporting patterns (themes) within the data in order to understand social processes. To this end, this research seeks to critically synthesize empirical findings, policy recommendations and theoretical analysis of the prospects and challenges of Policing Reforms through Privatization in India. The Research Onion model by Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2016) has been used in the arrangement of this research. The Research Onion defines several layers such as philosophy, approach, strategy, choice, time and techniques and procedures which makes the process of research systematic and logical. This framework enables the study to have coherency and consistency and helps in the formulation of the research methodological procedures..

3.3 Research Philosophy

Research philosophy used in the study is interpretivism as this research philosophy is most appropriate in qualitative research that aims at capturing the perception and experiences of people in a given society (Saunders et al. , 2016). Interpretivism assumes that the reality is constructed by the people and knowledge is developed through analyzing meanings and experiences. This philosophy is in line with the purpose of the study to examine the multifaceted and sometimes contradictory views on the privatization of police services, based on historical, cultural and sociopolitical factors that characterize India. That is why interpretivism helps to investigate the understanding of the role of privatization of police services by different actors including the police officers, policy makers, private security companies and the community. It makes it easier to comprehend the various constitutional, ethical and operational questions that could emerge under such a shift, appreciating that these dilemmas are shaped by, and expressed in, a range of sometimes competing legal interpretations of the function of law enforcement in society..

3.4 Research Approach

The research methodology used in this study is inductive, which involves starting with observations made from the literature and building up to more general and theoretical conclusions (Bryman, 2016). This method is more suitable for the exploratory research which aims at generating new theoretical insights into the process of privatization of police services in India. Using the inductive approach, the research can expand on previous works and explore new areas that may not have been captured by current theories. The inductive approach is useful for developing context-based understanding of the phenomena, which is particularly relevant for a research study conducted in the socio-political context of India. Through specific examples and contexts, this approach makes it possible to identify patterns and themes that help explain the possible effects of privatization of police services on public safety, accountability, and efficiency.

3.5 Research Strategy

The data collection method used in this study is secondary data analysis that entails the analysis and integration of the existing literature, reports, briefs, and legal documents. Using secondary data analysis is an excellent approach to understanding the possible effects of privatising the police since it makes it possible to review the current literature and discussions without having to collect data independently (Johnston, 2017). This is especially so given the fact that the main data collection method used in this study concerns law enforcement and public safety, which are sensitive issues with implications on ethical, logistical and resource considerations. Secondary data are collected data and they enable the research to collect data from a variety of sources, thus, providing the research with a wider and comprehensive view on the advantages and disadvantages of privatisation of police services. Thus, the research based on the analysis of several works discusses the general trends, tendencies, and points of view, as well as the issues which caused controversies. This is because understanding all these factors is necessary in identifying the possible factors that may lead to the success or failure of police privatization in India.

3.6 Research Choice

The research design adopts a single method of data collection, and that is the qualitative method to analyze the data thematically. The mono-method choice is suitable for this study because it is consistent with the research objectives which are to explore the possible effects of the privatization of police services. Through focusing on the qualitative data, the study exposes the personal views and attitudes of the various stakeholders, and the social, political, and legal frameworks that define the attitude towards privatization. The choice of the mono-method qualitative design is also in line with the purpose of the research questions which are mainly exploratory and descriptive. Qualitative research is especially appropriate for explaining how and why things happen, offering a comprehensive description of the social world that cannot be obtained through quantitative analysis (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). For the purpose of this study, qualitative analysis allows the research to probe into the process of privatizing police services in a bid to understand the various factors that may affect the process and the outcome..

3.7 Time Horizon

The study adopts a cross-sectional time horizon, analyzing data collected at a specific point in time rather than over an extended period. A cross-sectional approach is appropriate for understanding the current state of debates around the privatization of police services and identifying existing challenges and patterns in the literature (Ritchie et al., 2014). This approach provides a snapshot of the current state of police services in India and the potential impacts of privatization, highlighting key trends and developments in the field. While a longitudinal approach could offer additional insights into how perspectives on police privatization evolve over time, the cross-sectional design is sufficient for the purposes of this study. By focusing on the present state of police services in India, the research provides timely and relevant insights that can inform ongoing debates and policy discussions. Additionally, the cross-sectional approach allows for a more manageable scope of analysis, enabling the research to cover a broad range of issues and perspectives within the constraints of the study.

3.8 Data Collection Method

Sources of data for this study are secondary sources which include scientific research from peer reviewed academic and scholarly journals, government publications, policy briefs and legal sources among others. The choice of these sources is based on the research questions and objectives besides providing a breadth and depth approach to the analysis of the possible effects of outsourcing of police services in India. However, there are several advantages of using secondary data collection technique which include; the technique provides a wide access to various views and data sets and in addition, it can involve the scrutiny and enumeration of the existing knowledge and issues (Johnston, 2017). The process of identifying articles for inclusion in this review included comprehensive bibliographic search in the medical databases including JSTOR, PubMed, Google Scholar, and official websites of the governments. Keywords used in the search process are police privatization, public accountability, law enforcement efficiency and India. Literature review criteria include; the essay should be published within the last twenty years so that the analysis provides the most current perspective of the current debate. Besides, the sources of data also include legal sources in the form of case laws, legislation and policy briefs in an attempt to ensure that the constitutional and legal frameworks governing policing in India are comprehensively captured. Hence the triangulation that has been used in this research gives a stronger and more comprehensive view of the potential positives and negatives of police privatization.

3.9 Data Analysis Method

The data analysis method employed in this study is manual thematic analysis, which involves identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within the data. Thematic analysis is chosen for its flexibility and ability to provide a rich, detailed, and complex account of the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006). Thematic analysis allows the research to focus on both the manifest and latent content of the data, exploring not only what is explicitly stated in the literature but also the underlying assumptions, beliefs, and values that shape debates around police privatization.

The process of thematic analysis follows the six-phase framework outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006):

1. Familiarization with the Data: The first phase involves reading and re-reading the collected literature to become deeply immersed in the data. This process allows the researcher to gain a comprehensive understanding of the key issues and debates surrounding the privatization of police services in India.
2. Generating Initial Codes: In the second phase, the researcher identifies features of the data that are relevant to the research questions and systematically codes them. Coding involves labeling meaningful data segments with descriptive tags that capture their essence. This step is crucial for organizing the data and facilitating the identification of patterns and themes.
3. Searching for Themes: The third phase involves collating codes into potential themes based on similarities and differences. Themes are broader patterns that capture significant aspects of the data in relation to the research questions. This step involves clustering related codes into coherent categories that reflect key issues and debates in the literature.
4. Reviewing Themes: In the fourth phase, the researcher reviews the themes to ensure that they accurately represent the data set. This step involves refining the themes by checking them against the coded data extracts and the entire data set. The goal is to ensure that the themes are coherent, consistent, and relevant to the research questions.
5. Defining and Naming Themes: The fifth phase involves clearly defining each theme and identifying the essence of what each theme represents. This step requires the researcher to articulate the boundaries of each theme and specify what aspects of the data are captured within each theme. Naming the themes involves creating concise and descriptive labels that convey the core meaning of each theme.
6. Producing the Report: The final phase involves compiling the thematic analysis into a coherent and concise narrative that addresses the research objectives and questions. This step requires the researcher to synthesize the findings, integrating the themes into a comprehensive account of the potential impacts of privatizing police services in India. The report is structured to provide a clear and compelling argument that is grounded in the data and supported by relevant literature.

The manual coding process allows for a deep engagement with the data, ensuring that the themes are grounded in the literature and that the findings are robust and reliable. This approach also enables the researcher to maintain flexibility and adaptability throughout the analysis process, adjusting codes and themes as new insights emerge (Creswell & Poth, 2018).

3.10 Ethical Considerations

Secondary data and the sensitivity of the study call for ethical concerns in this research. The research comprises ethical guidelines for conducting secondary data analysis, and all the sources used are cited properly, and the analysis is performed without prejudice (Creswell, 2014). This study is aware of the problems that may arise due to the analysis of secondary data and has tried to present the positive and negative effects of privatization of police services in India. Moreover, the study also has implications on public policy and practice which have been discussed in relation to standard ethical concerns. The study is aware of the consequences of its findings to the law enforcement strategies and policies in India and seeks to provide useful input into the on-going discourses on police reform and public safety. Hence, the study aims at giving an overall and fair assessment of the possibilities and implications of privatisation of police service in order to create awareness to the policy makers, law enforcers, and the society.

3.11 Limitations of the Methodology

The thematic analysis provides valuable insights into the potential impacts of privatizing police services in India, it is not without limitations. One limitation is the reliance on secondary data, which may not fully capture the nuances of local policing practices and community experiences (Bryman, 2016). Secondary data analysis is inherently constrained by the quality and scope of the existing literature, which may vary in terms of depth, rigor, and relevance. Additionally, the manual coding process in thematic analysis can introduce researcher bias, although efforts were made to mitigate this through rigorous coding procedures and peer review (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Another limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the study, which provides a snapshot of the current state of debates around police privatization but does not capture changes over time. A longitudinal approach could offer additional insights into how perspectives on police privatization evolve and how policing practices adapt to changing social, political, and legal contexts. However, the cross-sectional design is deemed appropriate for the purposes of this study, given the need to provide timely and relevant insights that can inform ongoing debates and policy discussions.

3.12 Summary

The research methodology applied in the study is described, where we opted for a qualitative, secondary thematic analysis to analyze the effects of privatization on Indian police services. The Research Onion model is used in the research process and follows an interpretivist paradigm with an inductive approach. The information is collected from secondary sources such as government publications, legal papers, and scholarly articles. To understand the social and political context of privatization in India, a mono-method qualitative research design is chosen. Thematic analysis is utilized to analyze patterns and themes, while ethical concerns and the drawbacks of secondary data are discussed. Thus, the present research provides a rich understanding of the prospects and issues associated with police privatization in India.

4 Chapter 4: Results

4.1 Introduction

This chapter provides an insight of analysis made from secondary data collected through thematic analysis and identifying major themes associated with the privatization of police services in India. The analysis is therefore based on a synthesis that includes literature on the subject, government reports and case studies of similar circumstances in other countries. To establish credibility of the findings, the author had ensured that sources used were credible and fairly covered the impacts that privatization was bound to bring into the law enforcement agencies. The thematic analysis was carried out based on Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase approach, through which it is possible to accurately point out the patterns and trends in the data. The analysis uncovered three major themes central to understanding the effects of privatization on police services in India: They include; operational efficiency, accountability to the public and political interferences compared to corporate interferences (Squires, 2023). These themes are described below in further detail and where possible differentiation between privatized and traditional police services has been made with a view of assessing the prospects and pitfalls of privatization. The conclusions are discussed in light of socio-political realities of India, thus providing direction how these factors could potentially inform the prospects of privatized security services in India (Braun and Clarke, 2022).

4.2 Indian Context

Brown (2019) highlighted that the current state of policing in India is characterized by significant challenges, deeply rooted in both historical and structural issues. Indian police services operate under considerable strain, with an alarmingly low police-public ratio of approximately 152.8 officers per 100,000 people, far below the UN`s recommended standard of 222 officers (Brown, 2019). This shortfall is compounded by high vacancy rates, with some states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar reporting vacancies as high as 50% of the sanctioned strength. These staffing deficiencies lead to overburdened officers, long response times, and an inability to effectively manage the increasing complexity of crime, including cybercrimes, economic fraud, and organized crime (Brown, 2019). Furthermore, the infrastructure supporting the police force is outdated, with many police stations lacking essential modern amenities, such as communication networks and adequate transportation. The reliance on obsolete equipment further hampers the police`s ability to perform their duties efficiently, leaving them ill-equipped to address contemporary security challenges​ (Brown, 2019)

Ali (2024) emphasized that in addition to these operational challenges, Indian policing is governed by a colonial-era framework, primarily the Police Act of 1861. This antiquated legal structure was designed for a time when maintaining order through force was prioritized over community service and public trust. Despite various recommendations for reform, including those from the Second Administrative Reforms Commission and the Supreme Court in the Prakash Singh case, significant change has been slow to materialize (Ali, 2024). The existing system continues to suffer from issues such as political interference, which often compromises the impartiality and effectiveness of the police. Political entities frequently influence police operations for personal or party gain, undermining the rule of law and eroding public confidence in the police force​ (Ali, 2024).

Jauregui (2021) clarified that previous attempts at privatizing police functions in India have been limited and largely experimental. One of the more prominent examples of privatization within the Indian context is the use of private security agencies. These agencies, often employed by businesses, residential complexes, and individuals, have filled some of the gaps left by the inadequacies of public police services (Jauregui, 2021). However, the regulation of these private security firms has been inconsistent, leading to concerns about accountability, training standards, and the legal authority of private security personnel. The Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act of 2005 was introduced to address some of these issues, mandating licensing and setting standards for training and operation. Despite this, enforcement of these regulations varies significantly across states, resulting in a wide disparity in the quality and reliability of private security services​ (Jauregui, 2021).

Ramachandran (2023) demonstrated that legal considerations surrounding the privatization of policing in India are complex. The Indian Constitution lists `Police` as a state subject, meaning that each state has the authority to legislate and manage its police forces. This decentralization creates challenges for any nationwide privatization efforts, as each state may have different legal frameworks, priorities, and capacities for overseeing privatized services (Ramachandran, 2023). Moreover, the concept of policing is traditionally tied to the state`s sovereign function, raising questions about the constitutionality and ethical implications of transferring this responsibility to private entities. Critics argue that privatization could lead to a two-tiered system of law enforcement, where those who can afford private services receive better protection than those who cannot, thereby exacerbating existing social inequalities​ (Ramachandran, 2023).

According to Nagy (2020), Societal considerations are equally important in the debate over police privatization in India. Public trust in the police is already low, with only about 25% of Indians expressing confidence in their local police forces. Introducing private policing could further undermine this trust if not handled carefully, particularly in terms of ensuring accountability and transparency (Nagy, 2020). There is also the potential for increased corruption, as private entities might prioritize profit over public service. On the other hand, proponents argue that privatization could bring much-needed efficiency and modernization to Indian policing, especially if coupled with strong regulatory oversight. They point to the success of privatization in other sectors, such as telecommunications and aviation, as evidence that similar benefits could be achieved in law enforcement. However, the societal impact of privatizing police services remains a contentious issue, with opinions divided on whether it would ultimately improve or degrade public safety and trust in law enforcement​ (Nagy, 2020). W

While privatization offers potential solutions to some of the challenges facing Indian policing, it also raises significant legal, ethical, and societal questions. Any move towards privatization would need to be carefully calibrated to ensure that it enhances, rather than undermines, the principles of justice, equality, and public accountability that are central to effective law enforcement.

4.3 Theme 1: Operational Efficiency

4.3.1 Privatization of police services in India

Privatization of police services in India is likely to provide greater prospects for operational productivity in areas, including police response times, resource utilization, and infrastructure development. For the present, India’s traditional police services continue to struggle with operational issues such as inadequate personnel, outdated equipment, and response times. As demonstrated by a police-public ratio of 152 (Hull, 2022). With a ratio of 8 officers per 100,000 people, which is far from the 222 recommended by the UN, the public police force is overburdened and often cannot adequately address both traditional policing duties and new types of crime, including cyber fraud and organized crime. Privatization could provide solutions through the commitment of private resources, efficient management of resources, and deploying new technology (Garett Seivold, 2023).

4.3.2 Response times

The response times are the key performance indicators of the operations. The conventional policing in India would have lots of delays, due to lack of policemen especially in the rural areas and inadequate facilities available. While the police services remain privatized, the possibility of having more trained personnel and better equipment would result in faster responses, mainly in urban areas (Kumar, 2021). For instance, research conducted in the USA, Mexico where private security services act as second to the police, reveal that response time to non-emergency incidences has been enhanced (Rinku, Nusrat Jahan, 2022). This approach in India may provide solutions to overworking public officers to address grave criminal incidents while others like security, policing and traffic coordination are met by private parties.

4.3.3 Resource Management

A final area in which privatized services could potentially deliver better results than traditional police models relate to resource management. Public police in India often suffer from problems of inadequate resources particularly in vehicles, communication devices and modern means of investigation (Banerjee et al., 2021). These shortcomings could be redressed by privatized services which included private capital for improving the infrastructure needs and more efficient resource management systems. For example, in countries such as United Kingdom, outsourcing of functions in law enforcement has been done via some public-private partnerships where non-core areas such as administration are handled by private entities freeing up the public officers for core policing duties (Prenzler and Sarre, 2023).

4.3.4 Infrastructure Improvements

While 30% police stations in India having no communication facilities, privatization could bring change. Regarding structural development, privatized police services may bring in new technologies and equipment, which are helpful when dealing with contemporary offenses. The public police force of India is rather outdated, which makes it challenging to investigate intricate cases including cyber threats and frauds (Datta et al., 2020). In this case, the Indian government could leverage the expertise of the private sector to invest in modern technologies in some of the police functions that it intended to outsource. For example, South African private security companies have deployed sophisticated technologies of surveillance and crime control in middle- and upper-income residential areas as a supplement to community policing. It could be especially helpful in India where private actors could potentially complement the infrastructural development, appropriately functioning surveillance, and data collection which are crucial in handling both domestic and international criminal organizations (Datta et al., 2020).

However, it is important to evaluate some of the challenges of privatized services including equitable access to given resources. While private companies can enhance the performance of operations in places that can afford their services, rural and other deprived areas can still suffer from a lack of adequate policing (Berrone et al., 2019). For example, private security works better than the South African police in responding to crimes and managing them in wealthy neighborhoods, while poor neighborhoods lack adequate policing, which is a potential challenge of increasing police inequalities. These disparities raise the question of whether or not privatization can be a one size fits all solution for India, at least in the context of such regional differences in poverty and social injustice within the country (Lapuente and Van de Walle, 2020).

4.3.5 Comparative Insights from Other Countries

A comparative analysis of the privatized police services with the Indian Model clearly indicates that there is scope for enhancement of the operational efficiency especially in regards to response time, use of resources, and physical infrastructure (Albert H.Y. Chen and Davy, 2022). Comparing with the UK and South Africa, India might find it useful to experiment with partial police privatization: while some specific services, like administrative support and non-emergency calls, can be farmed out to private contractors, the element of the police that involves fighting crime and maintaining law and order should remain in the public domain (Roché and Fleming, 2022). Such a hybrid model could ease the working burden that has burdened Indian police force, enabled effective discharging of standard duties and investigated of complex criminal operations. But attention should be paid to how these improvements can be provided to all regions of the country without discrimination.

4.4 Theme 2: Public Accountability and Trust

4.4.1 Public Perception and Trust

The public accountability and trust level should be considered while assessing the prospects of privatizing police services in India. For the conventional police, measures of responsibility are well provided from public scrutiny, legal provisions, and government rules and regulations (R. Venkata Rao and Sharma, 2023). Nevertheless, the issue of privatised services often arises with questions of accountability and responsibility in terms of transparency and public trust. Drawing examples from India where people’s trust in the police is a cause of concern, privatization of police services opens up possibility of establishing or lowering police-community relations. The general Indian public also has a fairly negative view of the efficiency and integrity of law enforcement due to the concerns that it is corrupt, politically influenced, and inefficient, especially of the traditional police (Ishmael Mugari, 2022). Surveys show that 25% of Indians trust their local police, while the other 75% either have remain neutral or had negative perceptions stemming from police bias, corruption, or lack of response. The concept of privatizing police services could enhance perception in the event the services are outsourced with proper external control measures. Nevertheless, the intrusion of the private actors into the sphere of policing has to be done properly and should not deepen the current crisis of confidence (K. Nalla and Nam, 2020).

The level of trust in privatized police services differs in one country as opposed to another. Even in the United Kingdom, there are areas such as policing that have been partially privatized, however, the public satisfaction rate is still relatively high because of regulatory policies and audits. Non-core services like administrative services and management of traffic have been outsourced to enable public police forces work more effectively in the course of law enforcement without compromising efficiency or the public’s trust in the service (Malone and Dammert, 2020). However, in countries such as South Africa and Brazil, where privatized police services exist alongside the actual police, the outcomes are rather ambiguous (Stuurman, 2020). In such situations, the affluent persons and companies have greater access to private security services unlike the poorer populations who are in most cases still neglected in the security services, thereby leading to increased erosion of confidence in public and common law enforcement.

4.4.2 Accountability in Indian Police Services

Accountability is an important issue in the Indian context. The country has a traditional police force which causes a lot of issues including corruption and the use of force by the police. Political interference weakens credibility in advance since police operations can be influenced by the results desired by the local governments or other influential people. For instance, widespread cases of police’s partiality towards certain political groups while handling protests or election-related incidents have created negative perceptions among the public (Quah, 2019). Introducing privatized police services into this scenario can pose certain threats if the private players involved are not as answerable as conventional institutions. If left unmonitored, some privately contracted organizations may compromise citizens’ safety for profit, ignoring the laws or using the vulnerable groups for their selfish gains. Several related accountability issues can be seen through the following phenomenon in other countries. For instance, in the United States, privatized police functions especially private security firms have been alleged to lack accountability and transparency (Hu and Conrad, 2020). Various sad occurrences involving private security guards whereby they employed undue force have caused controversies when private firms can able to uphold ethical and legal standards similar to those of police officers. It is possible to foresee the same issues in India since the legal framework for private security companies is still under development. Some of these regulations are outlined in the Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act of 2005 but the implementation of these measures vary in different states hence private firms may engage in these activities without adequate regulation (Kammersgaard, 2019).

4.4.3 omparison of Public Satisfaction Rates

Comparing public satisfaction rates of traditional and privatized services, there are significant differences as well. As the privatization process has been well established in the UK, the public still retains high satisfaction with outsourced police services. Some of the benefits, which public forces have been able to gain from outsourcing their non-core functions, include; The public has embraced this hybrid model because key processes like criminal investigation and response to emergences are under the discretion of the state to meet the aspect of accountability (Clifford et al., 2024). On the other hand, nations such as South Africa provide an example of how police privatization leads to an overprotection of the affluent neighborhoods by private security companies, while the poorer neighborhoods remain insecure. Due to the above inequality in service provision, minoritized populations have expressed dissatisfaction and loss of trust in privatized police services as they regard them as worsening social and economic inequalities. Applying all these lessons for the Indian context, it is evident that it means that privatization should be handled in the same manner to avoid such consequences (Thomas, 2020). This means that if the privatized police services are introduced, they will likely make the existing problems worse by providing unequal services with richer areas receiving better services, while the rural and poor areas receive inferior services.

Therefore, evaluating the public and privatized police services, there are both opportunities and threats for India. Although privatization might enhance organizational performance and may even serve to rebuild lost public confidence in government services by eliminating inefficiencies, there are major issues arising from the absence of clear political obligations and accountability. The effectiveness of privatized services will remain constrained by the checks and balance framework designed to ensure private actors perform to the standard expected of public forces (Tellez, Wibbels and Krishna, 2020). Failing these checks and balances, the prospect of private policing may deepen the public mistrust and create even more divide between the haves and have nots in the law enforcement niche, which is inconsonant with the tenets of justice and equality.

4.5 Theme 3: Political Interference vs. Corporate Influence

It has been observed that a host of factors acting from the outside world exercise an influence on the results of policing in regard to both the conventional public police and the private varieties. Political interferences have remained common in the traditional police services in India with instances of law enforcement agencies being influenced by political factors. Conversely, corporate involvement in the privatized police services represents a contradiction in the sector as there are fears that profit-making may compromise public security (Long et al., 2019). The traditional Indian police services have been marked with extensive political influence across LPS and state service, specifically those from the local as well as state level. Police can be used by politicians for their own benefit, for example, to stop the activity of other political parties, interfere with criminal cases or control the police during elections. An example can be observed during the anti-CAA protests in the year 2020 where prejudices, police brutality, and influence of political authorities were evident (Kadiwal et al., 2022). A number of reports suggested that the police where selectively enforcing the law, therefore causing loss of public trust in the force. This political influence not only erodes the legitimacy of the police force but also undermines its neutrality to perform its rightful duties, which gives rise to social disappointment followed by the erosion of trust.

However, this makes the privatized police services vulnerable to corporate world influence with its own peculiar issues. In privatized model of security provision, firms that are to supply security may make decisions that tend to favor their business interests at the expense of the interest of the general public (Radić, Ravasi and Munir, 2021). For instance, in South Africa, private security companies – responsible for protecting some parts of the society – have been associated with concentrating their security effort in the wealthy areas while the poor areas are left insecure. Scholars argue that this selective policing conducted for profit-making has only served to enhance social stratification, unfair distribution of policing outcomes. In India, where social and economic inequality is highly pronounced, the same situation may prevail if privatization is not properly controlled. The concern arises that corporate-driven decision-making in policing may create a situation where policing services are delivered in an unequal manner, where the well-off regions get a better deal than the underprivileged regions (Radić, Ravasi and Munir, 2021). Policing is a topic that has been affected by the global environment, and it is for this reason that case studies from other countries are useful in the analysis of the impacts of the external environment on the process. For instance, in Brazil, private security companies contracted by companies have been involved in a flagrant violation of human rights. This has resulted in hi-er policing enforced for the protection of the corporate entities, to the detriment of the vulnerable communities in society (Stuurman, 2020). Likewise, in Mexico, private actors renewed concern as some firms portrayed needless favoritism where police services offered were tilted towards protecting business interests at the cost of justice for the citizens. These examples point to the negative implications of venting corporate power over the dispensation of police justice, thus giving scope to similar occurrences in India.

In privatized policing, autonomy and independence can influence accountability and transparency of companies controlling police operations. In the absence of proper supervision, the private players may go for their benefits only which may result in biased actions or unethical behavior. This is unlike the political interference in public police services where there are, albeit imperfect, mechanisms of accountability through public observation and legislation.

4.6 Summary

It is evident that privatization of police services in India could enhance the operation efficiency including response time, resources and structures. However, public accountability and trust still becomes an essential factor whenever services are privatized because inequality can be worsened without public scrutiny. Analyzing parallel championships in other countries, the effectiveness of public satisfaction and confidence in staying at the same level varies (Long et al., 2019). Last but not least, the subject of political influence in conventional police services and corporate influence in private ones is arguable, as both poses potential threats to impartiality in law enforcement. These issues are still valid, and the regulation and transparency of policing are essential to achieving fair outcomes in India.

5 Chapter 5: Discussion

5.1 Introduction

The purpose of this study is thus to evaluate the effects privatization has had on the police services in India in as far as management efficiency, accountability to the public as well as the impact of outside forces is concerned. In analyzing privatized police services, the results confirm that privatization’s theoretical advantage of efficient resource use and reduced emergency response time as claimed by New Public Management (NPM) theory. That is, several issues involving accountability and equity are still present, in keeping with the PV Theory imperatives (Abdulkareem & Mohd Ramli, 2021). The analysis also reveals that although privatization brings efficiency in operation, it has the possibility of increasing social inequality owing to rural area disadvantage so the space is created by Public Choice Theory and its ability to prevent inefficiency (Volejníková & Kuba, 2020). Also, the findings about the substitutability between political intrusion into public service delivery and corporate control over privatized systems recapitulate discourse on Principal-Agent Theory and the possibility of even weaker public accountability (Moore & Vining, 2023). In this way, the research answers several questions concerning the: comparison of privatized and traditional police services; The necessity of developing privatization frameworks that will reflect justice and public confidence in the police (Nøkleberg, 2019; Nagy, 2020).

5.2 Operational Efficiency: Does Privatization Offer Improvements?

The effects of outsourcing on productivity particularly based on New Public Management (NPM) conceptualization is a crucial factor when assessing the efficacy of privatized police services in India. Consequently, NPM supports the practice of private sector methods such as efficiency, customer orientation, and competition in the delivery of public services (Funck & Karlsson, 2019). Looking at the current state of Indian policing that lacks enough manpower and outdated equipment (Brown, 2019), privatization could in theory bring changes through increased efficiency in the use of available resources, quickness in responding to incidents, and betters’ infrastructure.

5.2.1 Resource Management and Infrastructure Challenges

Resource management is one of the primary issues which can be improved through privatization, an element of NPM. In India, traditional police services have acute human power and perceived inadequacies of financial and infrastructural support characterized by a police-population ratio. Currently, each police officer serves 8,333 people while the United Nations recommends one officer per 450 residents (Brown, 2019). This shortage is coupled with lack of modern equipment and communication networks where 30% of the police stations said they have inadequate infrastructure (Ali, 2024). These gaps could be filled with privatized services that bring in private capital and bring in new methods of employing resources such as personnel and technology. For instance, Principal-Agent Theory proposes this view and explains that profit-motivated private organizations could be more motivated to exercise prudent accountability on resources than public departments (Moore & Vining, 2023).

Nevertheless, the efficiency gains that are expected to result from privatization are not without some difficulties. Similarly, as NPM proposes, privatization might result in quicker reactions and more efficient delivery of services (Funck & Karlsson, 2019), but in the Indian socio-economic setting the situation can be rather different. Another risk is that the accessibility of privatized services may be a problem in rural areas. India also faces the problem of a significant rural and urban difference within the population where the rural-populated regions are underpoliced because of issues of geographical and economic reach (Brown, 2019). This split could widen if privatization continues to favor lucrative urban territories, thus denying rural regions sufficient police protection. For example, privatized police functions work well in the wealthy parts of South Africa but have not responded to the poor communities’ needs, illustrating one inequality danger (Stuurman, 2020).

5.2.2 Response Times and Geographic Disparities

As for response times, the provided argument of privatization gets down to overall service effectiveness in light of urbanization – in cities, private actors can allocate funds to technology and supply chain optimization to increase its effectiveness. The employment of technologies like surveillance systems and real-time data analysis was reported to cut down on response time in sectors that are privatized in countries like the United Kingdom, which have an effective implementation of PPPs (Mansaray et al., 2022). However, these improvements are not likely to be apparent across the entire country as some states may lack the adequate infrastructure or the economic viability to support them. The Public Choice Theory, which states that market-oriented services can be less attentive to less profitable areas, also indicates that privatization may not be beneficial for the poor in India (Volejníková & Kuba, 2020).

5.2.3  Cost Efficiency and Long-Term Implications

Another important issue that should be addressed is the issue of cost increases when it comes to the privatization of police services. The promises made with privatization include the reduction of costs and increase in efficiency in service delivery, however these have been refuted by research work in other countries. For instance, the outsourcing of non-strategic or peripheral police activities to private security companies in the United States has been reported to result in long-term cost inefficiencies that are associated with short-term gains, having been associated with high costs of contract administration and low service quality (Byrne, Kras & Marmolejo, 2019). Complimentary results could be familiar in India if privatization contracts are poorly guarded or if the private contractors/employers of education do not live up to expectations. This explains why governments need to employ strong regulatory mechanisms to pressure the private actors into delivering efficiency gains without compromising on the quality of services offered.

5.2.4 Profitability vs. Public Safety Concerns

Additionally, concerns with the relationship between efficiency and profitability have to be addressed. Whereas bed BR225, enshrined in NPM, postulates competition and profit as incentives for effectiveness (Funck & Karlsson, 2019), it is crucial to note that privatization could often shift emphasis to revenue as opposed to the safety of the public. In South Africa, private security companies have been said to be protecting the wealthy areas more while neglecting the poor through providing poor protection (Stuurman, 2020). The same risks hold true for India – privatization of police services may effectively protect solely urban upper classes while excluding rural poor. Public Value Theory holds that delivering value to all citizens should be the strategic direction for the public services and not just the value that will be afforded by those willing to pay for the privatized services.

5.2.5 Balancing Efficiency and Public Value

Further, while there are arguments that support privatization as a remedy for operation challenges such as inadequate and dilapidated infrastructure, privatization also brings broader hazards. For instance, in the case of private entities in the provision of public goods, they could be motivated to provide substandard services in order to make more profits. Since regulatory measures to monitor the activities of private entities are still weak in a country like India, this is particularly worrisome (Jauregui, 2021). The Property Rights Theory posits that while awarding managerial prerogative to the private sector, the primary concern might shift from the public interest emphasis to self-interest (Paul, 2023) which may lead to the eventual un sustainability (privatised police services) in India. Although the prospects of privatization of police services in India could enable administrative efficiencies including management of resources and quick responses, these are not always achievable. While the NPM framework encourages the introduction of private sector practices to increase efficiency, it is crucial to consider the dangers of unequal service provision, increased costs, and an emphasis on profitability. While privatization may be effective in enhancing service provision to customer-rich urban areas, it will not benefit the rural and low-income populations. Hence, the extent to which the privatization drives in India succeed in delivering well-performing services will depend on balanced and specific regulatory measures and balances that promote public service delivery and accountability (Nøkleberg, 2019). Public Value Theory on the need for balancing efficiency and equity in allocating police services risks to the private sector in the Indian environment.

5.3 Public Accountability and Trust: A Matter of Perception?

5.3.1 Public Accountability in Traditional Police Services

Responsibility is of particular interest when assessing public services, and the police services of India cannot be an exception. Public Value Theory states that public services must create public value and deliver value to the citizens through fairness, transparency, and accountability (Abdulkareem & Mohd Ramli, 2021). The issue of privatized police services is to retain the same level of trust and accountability as is required from traditional or conventional policing bodies. The Public Choice Theory also has some issues with the notion that self-interested profit-seeking players would not necessarily act in the public interest and might even distort accountability structures (Volejníková & Kuba, 2020). For public police services in the traditional setting, accountability is incorporated on a bureaucratic base. Civil servants work in an organizational structure that is rigid with clear policies and regulations intended to avoid bias and favoritism (Rodrigo Cetina Presuel & Martinez, 2023). Police officers have to work within certain legal provisions and are monitored or checked by authorities or citizens. However, as much as these structures have been established, Indian police services continue to experience vices like political influence and corruption that compromise the public’s confidence in the force (Brown, 2019). Ali (2024) noted that the police are still operating under the Police Act of 1861 in India, which provides no mechanisms for the police accountability in the contemporary perspective. Therefore, currently, as Nagy (2020) reported, the Indians’ confidence in local police is a mere 25%, thus the need for improved reforms for fairness and transparency.

5.3.2 Challenges of Accountability in Privatized Police Services

But when it comes to privatized police services, the picture becomes clearer. The mere process of privatization brings in the profitability factor, which may contradict the public interest. Private firms have stakeholders other than the general public as compared to public agencies which are held responsible to the public. Moore and Vining (2023) highlighted that with privatization, the emphasis is given to efficiency and saving – which might be achieved at the cost of accountability and public scrutiny. This lack of transparency is a major issue, especially in a country like India, where the regulation of private players is often far from perfect (Jauregui, 2021).

5.3.3 Transparency and Regulation in Privatized Policing

It is important to notice that there are significant differences on how transparency mechanisms operate in public and privatized police services. Democratic police forces, including public police, are governed by laws requiring them to report their actions and results to the government and, in some cases, the public (Brown, 2019). However, the private organizations engaged in policing activities may be subjected to far less disclosure regulations. Mansaray et al. (2022) also stressed that in the UK, where privatization has been introduced in some non-police core activities, informational transparency tends to be relatively less developed for private companies. This creates doubts over whether contracted police services in India can offer the same level of openness as seen in America, especially in light of Indian regulations’ current flaws (Ali, 2024).

5.3.4 International Case Studies on Privatization and Accountability

Other examples from different countries also shed more light on these accountability issues. South Africa particularly features private security companies as a significant contributor to policing, and accountability challenges have been pervasive. Stuurman (2020) further explained that while employing private security, it becomes clear that these companies concentrate services in the middle and upper-income areas at the expense of the lower-income areas. This conditioning furthers prejudices and perpetuates social disparities while simultaneously eroding the community’s confidence in the police. Similarly, the Indian context of high socio-economic inequalities poses the same threat if privatized police service delivery concentrates on affluent urban areas while leaving the rural areas unchecked (Brown, 2019).

Looking at the case of the United Kingdom, it can be seen that privatization has been relatively successful in some areas, specifically those that are tangential to police work, such as technology and other support services. In line with this assertion, Mansaray et al. (2022) have proposed that the collaboration with the private sector in policing has increased efficacy without much detriment to trustfulness. However, this dependability is credited to the sound legal systems in the region to safeguard the private players and ensure they operate in the larger interest of the population. Specifically, in India, such strong oversight might be missing, and thus, privatization leads to worsening accountability issues rather than solving them (Jauregui, 2021).

5.3.5 Impact of Privatization on Public Trust

As far as the level of trust in the population is concerned, privatization is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, privatization could bring innovation that is not tainted by corruption and inefficiencies that are typical of the Indian police services. According to Abdulkareem and Mohd Ramli (2021), the negative perception of the public towards privatization could be overcome by embracing efficiency and adopting new technologies that enhance service delivery. However, this rosy perspective is based on the belief that private companies will act in the public interest rather than for the bottom line, a notion that is rarely realized in reality (Moore & Vining, 2023). On the other hand, privatization can increase the existing trust deficit in Indian policing. In the context of the US, as Byrne, Kras, and Marmolejo (2019) pointed out, privatized police services lack public confidence because the public assumes their primary concern is profit making. In South Africa for example, privatization has brought about increased social injustice in that the rich enjoy better security services while the poor continue to be at the mercy of criminals (Stuurman, 2020). If privatized police services serve the poor less than they serve the wealthy, this could lead to a similar result in a country such as India, where public confidence in law enforcement is already lacking (Nagy, 2020).

The question then arises: can privatization help reduce the trust deficit or is it going to widen it even more? That depends with the policy measures that governments adopt when they privatize. Public Value Theory supports the idea of delivering value to citizens, especially the less fortunate ones (Abdulkareem & Mohd Ramli, 2021). Holding privatized police services accountable: Thus, in the Indian context, privatization must facilitate the same levels of accountability of private security services as that of the public agencies. This calls for proper governance, well-defined standards, and monitoring systems that are independent of the management.

5.4 Political Interference vs. Corporate Influence: Which is Worse?

Political intervention in public police services has therefore emerged over the years as a major problem in India. Ali (2024) has noted that many a political entity uses police operations for his/her or party’s benefits and thus distorts the neutrality of the police. This manipulation is based on the ancient Police Act of 1861 that grants political players excessive control over policing (Ali, 2024). Interference from the political wing undermines the police autonomy which ends up promoting political policing, such as during electoral periods or public demonstrations (Brown, 2019). Such factors have led to what Nagy observed as the erosion of public trust in the conventional policing (2020). Conversely, the influence of corporations that are involved in privatized police services has some negative impacts. Privatization, driven by profit motives has the potential of replacing political interference with corporate pressure. According to some critics like Moore and Vining (2023), organizations managed by privatization agenda bear greater responsibilities to their shareholders rather than the general public and may be inclined to overemphasize the financial performance of privatized services at the peril of safety. This change has the potential to sparad permanent policial selective, where private companies target affluent communities with high returns on investments, while leaving the poor without adequate security. Writing for staatstige, Stuurman (2020) highlighted that private security firms in South Africa over-securing middle and upper-class neighborhoods while under-securing the more vulnerable areas.

As for the question concerning the nature of privatized services, specifically if these are less vulnerable to external factors, this is a subject of discussion. According to Volejníková and Kuba (2020) they noted that while privatization removes direct political interferences, it establishes corporate vices which are just as disruptive. Interference from political authorities and corporate control can distort law enforcement’s objective, resulting in uneven delivery of services. According to Public Choice Theory, privatized service might simply substitute one type of manipulation with another since the private firms’ goal is to make as much profit as possible rather than serve the common good (Volejníková & Kuba, 2020). Thus, if political interference is reduced, it can be replaced by similar biases resulting from corporate influence on police decisions. This evaluation is in consonance with findings from a cross-sectional study of South Africa and the United Kingdom. Mansaray et al. (2022) in the context of the UK explained that while some non-core police functions have been privatized, the political influence was minimized but there are issues of corporate accountability and service standardization and delivery. On the same note, Stuurman (2020) pointed out that in South Africa, corporate influence contributed to selective law enforcement for privileged neighborhoods to continue perpetuating social exclusion. However, both the theories did not eliminate the external pressure but only shifted it from political entity to corporate entity.

Whether privatization is a viable solution for political interference depends with how effective the regulation of corporate influence is. Public Value Theory also argues that privatized services need to be in the public interest and need to follow the principles of rule of law; a notion that entails proper supervision and accountability systems (Abdulkareem & Mohd Ramli, 2021). Without these, privatization may only shift the pressure from outside in, as Moore and Vining (2023) have noted.

5.5 Implications for Policy and Future Research

The findings of this research highlight raise the issues of the relative merits and risks of privatization and public responsibility within the framework of the police services of India. While privatization may mean better operational efficiency, as Funck & Karlsson (2019) reveal, the issue of blurred transparency and possible direct corporate control over public interest persists. It thus calls for the policy reforms that balance the advantages of privatization with effective regulatory measures that will compel the privatized organizations to be accountable and fairly serve the society as postulated by the Public Value Theory (Abdulkareem & Mohd Ramli, 2021). Finally, future police reform policies should aim at developing such structures to potential political capture and corporate influence in India (Moore & Vining, 2023). This includes having good and concrete regulatory processes for the control of privatized organizations to avoid compromising the interest of the public due to profit seeking (Ali, 2024). More research should be conducted to conduct longitudinal studies in order to evaluate the effects of privatization on police, including public perception and delivery of services (Nagy, 2020). Furthermore, comparisons with the UK as well as with South Africa (Stuurman, 2020; Mansaray et al., 2022) might shed more light on the non-privatized forms of policing.

5.6 Summary

This chapter presents findings of the research on the effects of privatization on police services in India with regards to management efficiency, public accountability, and external forces. This research shows that, on the one hand, the New Public Management (NPM) theory’s approach to privatization optimizes resource management and enhances response time but, on the other hand, it worsens equity and accountability concerns particularly in the rural areas. They are seen to benefit the well-to-do urban areas at the expense of other regions especially the not so developed rural areas, thus worsening social injustice. The study also shows that privatization brings in the corporate culture thus while eliminating political interferences the public accountability is still in jeopardy. Some of the issues include; high contract costs, non-transparency and public trust. The chapter concludes that the regulation of privatized police services in India is required to foster better provision of police services in the interest of citizens covering rural and urban areas and thereby avoid the deepening of rural-urban inequalities in India.

6 Chapter 6: Conclusion

6.1 Restatement of Research Aim and Questions

The aim of this research was to evaluate the potential impact of privatizing police services in India, focusing on three key areas: efficiency, transparency to the public, and external influence. Through these aspects the study intended to establish if privatization can solve the challenges that the traditional police services in India faces such as understaffing, outdated infrastructure and political intervention.The research was guided by how does the effectiveness of privatized police services compare to traditional public police services in terms of operational efficiency and crime resolution? What are the implications of privatization on public accountability and trust? To what extent can privatization mitigate or replace political interference with corporate influence, and what are the consequences for law enforcement integrity? In this qualitative, thematic study, the authors examined whether privatization might enhance efficiencies in policing practice while preserving the public’s confidence and the fairness.

6.2 Summary of Key Findings

The study found that the privatization can have better prospects of real ‘service enhancing’ effects in relation to operational performance, including the utilization of resources, response time, and infrastructure. New Public Management (NPM) posits that the application of private sector management practices in the public service promotes efficiency through dem bureaucratization and marketization. These problems in the Indian context could be solved by offering operations of the services to the private sector as they may bring in investment besides using appropriate technology for the services, particularly in urban centres. For instance, similar to the situation in the UK, outsourcing non-police functions could relieve pressure on the public purse and help officers to concentrate on more essential areas. However, this implies that there are several challenges that still exist with more emphasis being placed on privatized services which may be less available in the rural areas due to low profits. The lack of balance in distribution of resources and services between the prosperous urban centers and impoverished rural regions is a major threat. This concerns the equity and whether the private police services can access all regions of India equally.

Public accountability was perceived to be one of the major challenges that came with the concept of privatization. Traditional police services have a system of legal authority, governmental oversight, and public scrutiny to ensure public accountability. But privatization adds a commercial imperative, which may not always be aligned with the Public Value Theory comprehending public services should generate value for everybody in society. There is no reason why people in India would trust the police as the force is rife with corruption and political influence – privatized services may even deepen this distrust if they are not regulated properly. Research conducted among the South African and United States have shown that most privatized security services targets richer people hence leaving the poorest of the society without adequate security services. This selective policing could increase current social disparities in India since the current police forces are comparatively insufficient in rural and lower income neighborhoods. However, transparency measures are generally less effective in privatized services as compared to public services. Private firms are owned by its shareholders and not the public; therefore, they may lack the public’s trust due to their operations’ limited transparency. Thus, the trend to privatized services can bring the growth of the accountability gap in the absence of sufficiently effective regulation.

The third theme discussed the cost/benefit analysis of having political influence in the conventional provision of the public police services and the corporate influence in providing privatized services. Political influence is a major factor in Indian PPS, specifically, the public police services are used for political gains. This erodes the fairness of police services and causes the public distrust. For instance, privatization, which implies freeing up of law enforcement agencies from government influence, could potentially decrease political interference. But, privatization presents a distinct form of external pressure which is corporate pressure. Private entities operate for profits and, therefore, may not always act in the best interest of the public. Recent studies in South Africa illustrate that the majority of private security companies do not invest their resources in the struggling neighborhoods but rather, the affluent ones, thus widening the gap between the two. Where social-economic disparities are already prevalent in emerging global location such as India, the influence of the corporate society may be deemed detrimental, as it may further compound the existing imbalance, thereby translating into unequal treatment by the police force in different regions.

Hence, the removal of political influence by privatization can be offset by corporate influence, which is equally damaging to police independence and impartiality of the legal process. It is essential to ensure that police services industry does not compromise in its provision of services since the focus will be on profits.

6.3 Recommendations

6.3.1 Policymakers

To achieve privatization without compromising the public interest, policy makers need to come up with policies that will help check on privatized police services much as they would check on public servants. This may range from setting specific targets and conditions of fulfilling privatized services in a way that reflects the public’s expectation (Owens and Ba, 2021). From the case of UK experience regarding corporatization, it was found that there is a possibility of experimenting with privatization of non-core police functions which are not sensitive areas of policing where public may lose confidence in police organizations. However, it is important to ensure that such partnerships are properly policed so that the sole motivation of corporations is not to advance their dangerous agendas.

6.3.2 Regulatory Framework

Effective regulation of these privatized police services remain critical especially to the Indian context. There should be a supervisory agency like a regulatory body to oversee the operations of these private police contractors to ensure that they are producing good results, to make sure that they aren’t profiting at the expense of delivering quality services that are expected of a police force that has been contracted to work for the public. Increasing licensing criteria, performing audits more frequently, and publishing inspection results may enhance the organization’s transparency and accountability. This framework should also guard against issues of discrimination by making sure privatized services are equally distributed across regions, including the rural areas and for the low income population. Similarly, Ali (2024) noted the urgent need to reform Indian police laws, especially police law of 1861 that has not been effective enough to address some consequences of ‘privatization’. Modernizing these laws will establish legal framework aiming to incorporate the private security services into the law enforcement system.

6.3.3 Further Research

To get a deeper insight on the positive and negative effects of privatization, more research has to be conducted to understand the effects of privatization on police services in India in the long run. Some longitudinal designs could investigate whether privatized services sustain competence in service delivery and responsiveness to the public over time. Furthermore, international comparative research with the countries such as the UK, South Africa, and the United States could be hugely beneficial towards understanding more about the various modes of consequent privatized policing and whether they are applicable in the Indian context as well. It is also important to find out more about an extensive form of hybrid police forces of both public and private sectors. Such scenarios could entail devolving some managerial or routine tasks other than emergencies though the community retains control over the key policing responsibilities. Given the experience of some nations in implementing such models, it is possible for Indian political leaders to implement a system that is efficient yet remains responsive to demands of the public.

6.4 Concluding Thoughts

The privatization of police services in India has its benefits and drawbacks. First, privatization may help solve the issues with the performance that affects the conventional police services, especially in the cities where they are a scarcity of resources. However, privatization poses threats of worsening the social inequities and decreasing public oversight, particularly when the business sector sets the agenda for police work. Thus, in order for privatization to work in India it must be done gradually with a strong regulatory environment and measures to prevent corruption. The Public Value Theory therefore tells us that the police and other public agencies cannot focus only on the rights of business people to protect them from the public. By understanding the advantages of privatization and the importance of public confidence, India can improve the police services in a manner that enhances justice and equity. In the future, the tendency towards privatization in different spheres of life, including the police, can be useful for India. However, given the sociopolitical and economic situation of the country, it is advisable to be careful and consider the context. The future course of action for the Indian Police will depend on the formulation of policies which would ensure the good parts of both the public and private models while maintaining principles of equity and integrity.

7 References

Abdulkareem, A.K. and Mohd Ramli, R. (2021). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2021-0001.

Abramovaite, J., Bandyopadhyay, S., Bhattacharya, S. and Cowen, N. (2022). Classical deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of police force areas in england and wales. European Journal of Criminology, [online] 20(5), pp.1663–1680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211072415.

Ahirrao, P. and Khan, S. (2021). Assessing Public Open Spaces: A Case of City Nagpur, India. Sustainability, 13(9), p.4997. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094997.

Albert H.Y. Chen and Davy, U. (2022). Law and Social Policy in the Global South. [online] Routledge eBooks. Informa. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003242826.

Ali, H. (2024). Crumbling Pillars: Understanding Institutional Decay in Indian Democracy. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, [online] 5(2), pp.652–662. doi:https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-II-S)63.

Andrews, R., Clifton, J. and Ferry, L. (2022). Corporatization of public services. Public Administration. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12848.

Banerjee, A., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Keniston, D. and Singh, N. (2021). Improving Police Performance in Rajasthan, India: Experimental Evidence on Incentives, Managerial Autonomy, and Training. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(1), pp.36–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190664.

Berrone, P., Ricart, J., Duch, A., Bernardo, V., Salvador, J., Piedra Peña, J. and Rodríguez Planas, M. (2019). EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 11(8), p.2339. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082339.

Bishop, P. (2019). Rousseau and the Social Contract. German Political Thought and the Discourse of Platonism, pp.93–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04510-4_4.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2022). Toward Good Practice in Thematic analysis: Avoiding Common Problems and be(com)ing a Knowing Researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, [online] 24(1), pp.1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brogaard, L. and Helby Petersen, O. (2021). Privatization of Public Services: A Systematic Review of Quality Differences between Public and Private Daycare Providers. International Journal of Public Administration, pp.1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619.

Brown, G.R. (2019). To Swerve and Neglect: De-Policing Throughout Today’s Front-Line Police Work. [online] repository.library.carleton.ca. Available at: https://repository.library.carleton.ca/concern/etds/h989r411b.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Byrne, J., Kras, K.R. and Marmolejo, L.M. (2019). International perspectives on the privatization of corrections. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(2), pp.477–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12440.

Clifford, B., Gunn, S., Inch, A., Schoneboom, A., Slade, J., Tait, M. and Vigar, G. (2024). Professionalism and planning. Bristol University Press, [online] pp.159–184. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/monochap/book/9781447366058/ch009.xml [Accessed 27 Aug. 2024].

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

Datta, P., Panda, S.N., Tanwar, S. and Kaushal, R.K. (2020). A Technical Review Report on Cyber Crimes in India. 2020 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI). doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/esci48226.2020.9167567.

Funck, E.K. and Karlsson, T.S. (2019). Twenty‐five years of studying new public management in public administration: Accomplishments and limitations. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12214.

Garett Seivold (2023). What We’ve Learned: Lessons from the World’s Leading Security Companies on Partnerships and Privatization. Competitive government, pp.321–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42406-9_15.

Harris, A., Smith, T. and Obara, E. (2019). Justice ‘cost points’. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(2), pp.343–359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12442.

Hu, S. and Conrad, C.R. (2020). Monitoring via the Courts: Judicial Oversight and Police Violence in India. International Studies Quarterly, 64(3), pp.699–709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa039.

Huchhanavar, S.S. (2020). Regulatory mechanisms combating judicial corruption and misconduct in India: a critical analysis. Indian Law Review, 4(1), pp.47–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1711498.

Hull, M. (2022). Corporations and States. Cultural Anthropology, 37(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.14506/ca37.4.07.

Human Rights Watch (2023). India: Events of 2023. [online] Human Rights Watch. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/india.

Ishmael Mugari (2022). Rethinking the Models of Police Oversight: Toward a New Paradigm. Springer eBooks, pp.11535–11541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_3631.

JASSAL, N. (2020). Gender, Law Enforcement, and Access to Justice: Evidence from All-Women Police Stations in India. American Political Science Review, 114(4), pp.1035–1054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000684.

Jauregui, B. (2021). Lawfare and Security Labor: Subjectification and Subjugation of Police Workers in India. Law & Social Inquiry, pp.1–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2021.32.

Jha, R. and Vipul Mudgal (2022). Status of Policing in India Reports: 2018 and 2019. Springer series on Asian criminology and criminal justice research, pp.149–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12251-4_4.

Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(1), 619-626.

K. Nalla, M. and Nam, Y. (2020). Corruption and Trust in Police: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Procedural Justice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, p.0306624X2092801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x20928019.

Kadiwal, L., Jain, M., Nayanpally, S., Andrabi, R., Sharma, P., Khandelwal, C. and Arif, W. (2022). Contesting authoritarianism, redefining democracy: Youth and citizenship in contemporary India. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 17(3), pp.341–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00097_1.

Kammersgaard, T. (2019). Private security guards policing public space: using soft power in place of legal authority. Policing and Society, 31(2), pp.1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1688811.

Kulshreshtha, N. (2020). An Assessment of Policing Behaviour With Regard to Offences Against Women in India. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3706034.

Kumar, R. 0000-0001-6101-4121 (2021). Police Matters : The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975. Oapen.org. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.7298/j2j5-ya41.

Lapuente, V. and Van de Walle, S. (2020). The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services. Governance, [online] 33(3), pp.461–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502.

Long, W., Li, S., Wu, H. and Song, X. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The roles of government intervention and market competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1817.

Malone, M.F.T. and Dammert, L. (2020). The police and the public: policing practices and public trust in Latin America. Policing and Society, 31(4), pp.1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1744600.

Mansaray, A., Ataullah, A., Coleman, S. and Sirichand, K. (2022). Countries’ Attractiveness for Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4071517.

McKay, D.L. (2019). Real Indians: Policing or Protecting Authentic Indigenous Identity? Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7(1), p.233264921882145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218821450.

Meerts, C. (2019). Corporate Investigations: Beyond Notions of Public–Private Relations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(1), pp.86–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219890202.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Moore, M.A. and Vining, A.R. (2023). PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy. Policy Sciences, 56(2), pp.267–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09504-7.

Nagy, V. (2020). A Critical Approach to Police Science.

Nøkleberg, M. (2019). The public-private divide revisited: questioning the middle ground of hybridity in policing. Policing and Society, pp.1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1576673.

Owens, E. and Ba, B. (2021). The Economics of Policing and Public Safety. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), pp.3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.3.

Paul, S. (2023). Property Rights. Springer eBooks, pp.1165–1173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74319-6_355.

Prenzler, T. and Sarre, R. (2023). Public Space Crime Prevention Partnerships: Reviewing the Evidence. Competitive government, pp.67–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42406-9_3.

Quah, J.S.T. (2019). Combating police corruption in five Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), pp.197–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-06-2019-0100.

R. Venkata Rao and Sharma, P. (2023). Privatization Framework and Processes of Criminal Justice System: Quo Vadis? Social Science Research Network. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4509668.

Radić, M., Ravasi, D. and Munir, K. (2021). Privatization: Implications of a Shift from State to Private Ownership. Journal of Management, 47(6), p.014920632098835. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320988356.

Ramachandran, V. (2023). Ethnography at an Intersection: Law, Anti-Trafficking NGOs, and Prostitution in India. Law & Social Inquiry, [online] 48(1), pp.67–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.28.

Ren, L., Zhao, J. “Solomon” and He, N. “Phil” (2017). Broken Windows Theory and Citizen Engagement in Crime Prevention. Justice Quarterly, [online] 36(1), pp.1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1374434.

Rinku, Nusrat Jahan (2022). Experience of female wheelchair users’ personal hygiene management during menstruation. Crp-bangladesh.org. [online] doi:http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/964.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage Publications.

Roché, S. and Fleming, J. (2022). Cross-national research. A new frontier for police studies. Policing and Society, pp.1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2037560.

Rodrigo Cetina Presuel and Martinez, J.M. (2023). The Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Bureaucratic Decision-making: A Weberian Perspective. Digital government. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3609861.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Limited.

Shekhar, P. (2024). Police Reform In India In 2024- Explained Pointwise |ForumIAS. [online] Available at: https://forumias.com/blog/police-reform-in-india-explained-pointwise/.

Squires, V. (2023). Thematic Analysis. Springer Texts in Education, pp.463–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_72.

Stuurman, Z. (2020). Policing inequality and the inequality of policing: A look at the militarisation of policing around the world, focusing on Brazil and South Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), pp.43–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.1748103.

Tellez, J.F., Wibbels, E. and Krishna, A. (2020). Local Order, Policing, and Bribes. World Politics, 72(3), pp.377–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887120000064.

Thomas, R. (2020). Does Outsourcing Improve or Weaken Administrative Justice? A Review of the Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725810.

Ullah, F. (2024). Colonial policing and police administration in erstwhile Northwest Frontier Province and tribal areas of British India. Cogent social sciences, 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2326179.

Venegas, M.F. (2023). The politics of energy privatization in Latin America: Contours and directions. Sociology Compass. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13147.

Volejníková, J. and Kuba, O. (2020). An Economic Analysis of Public Choice: Theoretical Methodological Interconnections. Upce.cz. [online] doi:https://doi.org/1211-555X.