Critically appraise relevant policies and clinical governance in clinical practice.

ASSIGNMENT 3 FRONT SHEET

Professional Practice and Strategy implementation in the context of Health Care Management

Student Name:
Certification:  I certify that the whole of this work is the result of my individual effort and that all quotations from books, periodicals etc. have been acknowledged.
Student Signature:	Date:
Student Registration Number:
Student email address:

Programme: WGU Online MBA		Level: Post Graduate
Academic Year:  20/21		Semester:  NA
Module title: Professional Practice and Strategy implementation in the context of Health Care Management		Assignment no.  2
Module code:  ONL721	Word guide: 1,500
Percentage Weighting of this assignment for the module: 50%
Issue date:	Return date:
Lecturer:	Second marker:

Notes for students: Electronic copy of assignment must be submitted through Turnitin. Students should ensure that they comply with Wrexham University’s plagiarism policy. Students should make correct use of the Harvard referencing method.

Learning Outcomes Tested in Assignments 1, 2 and 3: Critically appraise relevant policies and clinical governance in clinical practice. Justify approaches to strategy implementation considering resource implications. Critically evaluate methods of determining quality in health and social care.

Overall Comment:
	Mark (%)

Would students please note that achievement of the learning outcomes for this assessment is demonstrated against the assessment criteria shown below (which are not necessarily weighted equally).  All marks/grades remain indicative until they have been considered and confirmed by the Assessment Board

Assessment Criteria		Marks Awarded	Marks Available
1	Taking account of your research, discussions and findings from assignments 1 and 2, critically discuss and evaluate how a plan for evaluation will be delivered. 1,500 word essay	100%

Assignment 1 Guidelines

This assignment is to be written in essay format.

In this assignment you will need to consider the strategic implementation plan in terms of its delivery, and how it will be monitored.

You will also need to consider who will review it, how and when.

This assignment also requires you to think about the setting of KPIs, and the ability to change direction when needed (flexibility and agility).  You will also need to consider what steps for evaluation need in place to ensure staff are engaged in the delivery evaluation process.

This assignment must be supported by relevant academic theory.

While this assignment is weighted at 50%, your marks will be out of 100%

Please make sure that you correctly cite and reference all secondary sources you use, and include a reference list. All referenced work should be obtained from credible sources such as academic journals and textbooks.

All written work must be in line with Harvard referencing.

Reference lists and any appendices/additional documents will not be included in your final word count

Masters level Marking Criteria

No work has been submitted in the time allowed, or the work submitted demonstrates little or no understanding of the task or the subject matter.  This may be evident where the work is substantially incoherent, irrelevant or lacking in factual content, or where these shortcomings are present in combination such that the work as a whole is unsound.  Major errors of fact, or evidence of substantially poor cognitive or other relevant skills will also lead to a fail.	Fail: Marks below 30%
The work shows some knowledge and required skills are present to a degree.  There may be appreciable error or omission of facts, poor structure, misdirection to the task, or poor conceptualisation or illustration of the work.  Evidence of analysis and evaluation is weak.  There will be indications in the work that the candidate is capable of improving it by further application to the task	Fail: Marks in the range 30% – 39%
The work contains sufficient descriptive information.  There is some analysis and explanation with appropriate illustration and example, and some attempt to evaluate.  The work will generally be coherent and relevant, it will contain some useful proposals or solutions related to familiar solutions and there will be some attempt at originality.  It will be communicated clearly.	Pass: Marks in the range of 40% – 49%
The work contains all the necessary contextual information.  There will be adequate analysis, explanation and conceptualisation, with appropriate illustration and example, and sound attempts to evaluate and judge.  The work will be substantially coherent and will contain relevant and feasible proposals or solutions related to familiar situations, some responses to uncertainty or ambiguity and some acknowledgements of the implications of change.	Pass: Marks in the range of 50% – 59%
The work will contain complete explanations using most available information.  There will be substantial analysis; the ability to recognise evidence, use ideas, conceptualise, evaluate and judge in familiar situations will be clearly demonstrated.  Proposals or solutions will be contextually relevant and useful, with substantial evidence of the skill necessary to operationalize them in a variety of situations, including those in which uncertainty, ambiguity or change are present.  The work will provide evidence of originality and of useful knowledge transfer to novel situations.  It will be coherent and convincing.	Pass: Marks in the range of 60% - 69%
The work will clearly demonstrate the ability to analyse accurately, reliably and fully, all relevant information; to use evidence; to conceptualise, evaluate and judge; to propose and operationalise effective solutions, and to show substantial originality and creativity in a variety of familiar situations or in the face of ambiguity, uncertainty or change.  It will demonstrate valuable knowledge transfer and propose feasible solutions for a wide range of situations.  Evidence of the ability to innovate will be present.	Pass: Marks in the range of 70% and above

Sample Answer, Order Now for a Custom Written Work

Critically appraise relevant policies and clinical governance in clinical practice.

Clinical governance encompasses frameworks and processes aimed at achieving high standards of clinical care while mitigating risks associated with practice. Policies, on the other hand, provide structured guidelines that inform clinical decisions and operations.

Appraising Relevant Policies and Clinical Governance

Key policies, such as the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 in the UK, enforce standards concerning patient care and safety. The implementation of the Duty of Candour regulation, for instance, promotes transparency and fosters trust by mandating healthcare providers to inform patients about adverse events. Furthermore, clinical governance frameworks integrate elements such as risk management, staff education, clinical audits, and patient involvement to ensure a holistic approach to care quality.

However, challenges persist in achieving uniform compliance due to resource limitations, cultural resistance to change, and the variability in interpretation of policies across different organisations. Research and findings from prior assignments underline the significance of leadership and collaboration in embedding these policies into practice effectively.

Developing a Plan for Evaluation

The delivery of a robust plan for evaluation necessitates a strategic approach, guided by SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) objectives. This ensures that evaluation efforts are focused and lead to actionable insights. The following elements should form the backbone of the plan:

1. Setting Clear Objectives: Define what aspects of clinical governance or policies need evaluation, such as adherence to infection control measures or the impact of risk management protocols on patient outcomes.

2. Engaging Stakeholders: Collaborate with clinical staff, administrative teams, and patients to gather diverse perspectives. This participatory approach strengthens the evaluation`s relevance and acceptance.