1.1 Assess the available project data and obtaining more information from alternative sources in situations where the available project data is insufficient
Unit 64 – Evaluate and confirm work methods and programme
Complete all questions referencing supporting evidence in your narrative such as photographs or documents for performance-based elements. Include evidence that shows that you have engaged with the activity.
Aim for 100-200 words per question in your written narrative for performance-based elements.
Knowledge Elements have been coloured in BLUE where an academic answer is required and NOT work based evidence.
Aim for a minimum of 200 words per Learning Outcome for the Knowledge elements.
Please refer to the ProQual document and Cognitia unit guide.
Please complete the below box before completing this unit (if you don’t have an electronic signature you can type your name in this section).
1) Be able to evaluate, review and select work methods
1.1 Assess the available project data and obtaining more information from alternative sources in situations where the available project data is insufficient
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
1.2 Identify and evaluate the possible work methods against relevant technical and project criteria and select those which best meets the criteria
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
1.3 Propose the selected method to decision makers.
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
1.4 Analyse the method which has been selected for its activity content and quantifying it accurately
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
1.5 Review method statements to ensure that they are accurate, clear, concise and acceptable to all the people involved
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
2) Understand how to evaluate, review and select work methods
2.1 Examine how to assess the available project data and obtain more information from alternative sources in situations where the available project data is insufficient
|
|
2.2 Describe how to identify and evaluate the possible work methods against relevant technical and project criteria and select those which best meets the criteria
|
|
2.3 Propose how to propose the selected method to decision makers
|
|
2.4 Examine how to analyse the method which has been selected for its activity content and quantify it accurately
|
|
2.5 Examine how to review method statements to ensure that they are accurate, clear, concise and acceptable to all the people involved
|
|
3) Be able to confirm project programming
3.1 Analyse the sequential programming of activities against project requirements and the requirements of significant external factors and necessary resources
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
3.2 Ensure that the produced programmes and schedules of planned activities are consistent with the complexity of the project
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
3.3 Confirm alterations to the works programme which will meet changed circumstances or offer cost and time benefits, calculate the savings accurately and justify them to decision makers.
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
3.4 Develop a system for monitor the works programme, implement it and use the results to improve future production and plan
|
|
Supporting Evidence
|
|
4) Understand how to confirm project programming
4.1 Examine how to analyse the sequential programming of activities against project requirements and the requirements of significant external factors and necessary resources
|
|
4.2 Explain how to ensure that the produced programmes and schedules of planned activities are consistent with the complexity of the project
|
|
4.3 Explain how to confirm alterations to the works programme which will meet changed circumstances or offer cost and time benefits, calculate the savings accurately and justify them to decision makers
|
|
4.4 Propose how to develop a system for monitor the works programme, implement it and use the results to improve future production and plan
|
Unit 64 – Evaluate and confirm work methods and programme
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions