Assignment brief essay, and or report, and or literature review and or equivalent
|
Module code
|
|
Module title
|
Principles of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
|
Submission date, time
|
|
Feedback type & date
|
|
Word count
|
2000 words
|
Assignment type
|
Individual Essay
|
Assignment structure and format
|
Title, introduction (approx. 500 words), main body of the essay/discussion, and conclusion (approx. 1500 words); references
|
Assessed learning outcome (s)
|
- Appraise enabling and constraining factors which impact on innovation and entrepreneurship.
- Apply theoretical innovation and entrepreneurship concepts to case study.
- Explore innovation in products and services.
|
Module weighting %
|
70%
|
Key reading and learning resources
|
Key reading and learning resources include essential and recommended texts
|
Assignment marking criteria rubric (Literature Review)
|
Section/ criteria
|
1-4
|
5-8
|
9-12
|
13-16
|
17-20
|
Introduction: A clear rationale for the topic choice
|
Outstanding discussion and justification of topic selected
|
Thorough discussion and justification of topic selected
|
Evidence of some discussion and justification of topic selected
|
Adequate discussion and justification of topic selected
|
Discussion and justification of topic selected is inadequate
|
Discussion: Content: relevant and informative, applying depth of knowledge and understanding
|
Excellent and well-informed understanding of theories and concepts involved
|
Good understanding of theories and concepts involved
|
Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge and understanding theories and concepts
|
Adequate content; limited depth of knowledge and understanding shown
|
Inadequate content; limited depth of knowledge and understanding shown
|
Conclusion: Clear conclusions from the literature
|
Tightly structured, logical and draws coherent conclusions to the topics covered
|
Undertakes a systematic analysis of the issues and draws coherent conclusions to the topics covered
|
Sound conclusions to the topics covered
|
Adequate conclusions to the topics covered
|
Inadequate conclusions to the topics covered
|
References: Reference to sources including directions for further study
|
Broad and relevant readings examined and used selectively in the work
|
Good range of appropriate references used during the review
|
Conventional references and readings used within the review
|
Adequate but limited use of references during review
|
Review relies on no or one reference; evidence of unexamined personal opinion
|
Presentation:
Clearly presented with limited spelling and grammatical errors
|
Very well expressed and understanding of content with limited spelling or grammatical errors
|
Very well expressed; good understanding of content with some spelling and/ or grammatical errors
|
Well expressed; understanding of content with several spelling and/ or grammatical errors
|
Unclear expression of information; little understanding of content; several spelling and grammatical errors
|
Several spelling and grammatical errors
|