Critical Evaluation of Results Only Work Environment and Alternative Flexibility Programmes
Assignment Brief
Term Report Assessment
Watch the video, using the following link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgODDnZprMo
-
With reference to Human Resource Planning, Job Analysis and job design critically evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of Results Only Work Environment presented in the video.
-
Select three alternative flexibility programmes and discuss their merits.
Each of the above two questions is worth 50 possible points, 100 points total. Formalities:
-
Wordcount: 2,000 words
-
Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount.
-
Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
-
Text alignment: Justified.
-
The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
-
Weight: This task has a weighting of 40% of the total grade for this subject.
-
Learning results
This paper assesses the student’s comprehension of flexibility programmes as an important component of job design in today’s organisations.
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69 Knowledge & Understanding (20%)
-
Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.
-
Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.
-
Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.
-
Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary.
Application (30%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
-
Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.
-
Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.
-
Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking (30%)
-
Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.
-
Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.
-
Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.
-
Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.
Communication (20%)
-
Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
-
Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck
-
Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident.