Critically analyse different healthcare systems to identify and discuss the key features of a health system.
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Module Name: Comparative Healthcare Systems
Academic Year: 2024-25
Assessment Period: Trimester 2
UN3014 Comparative Healthcare Systems
Module Code
Level
Credit Value
Module Leader
UN3014
6
30
Assessment code and title:
AS1 Assignment
Assessed Learning Outcomes:
a) Critically analyse different healthcare systems to identify and discuss the key features of a health system.
b) Compare and contrast policy development across different healthcare systems.
e) Communicate and argue information professionally and emphatically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area
Weighting:
50%
Word limit
3,000 words
Submission deadline:
Friday 11th April at 2 pm (Week 12)
Other key information:
An individual assessment:
A 3000-word written assignment that provides a comparative analysis of at least two healthcare systems in terms of key features and policies.
Your work must be uploaded on the Turnitin submission link, and will be checked for academic integrity.
Please read this assessment brief in its entirety before starting work on the assessment task.
The Assessment Task: Your task is to write a 3000-word critical comparative analysis of two healthcare systems and their policy developments.
You should include a critical comparative analysis of the key features and functions of the healthcare systems in the UK and USA.
You should compare and contrast policy development across different healthcare systems.
You should then highlight how the health policies in the UK and USA are likely to evolve in the future to respond to the emerging health and well-being needs of their populations.
Assessment Guidance:
The 3000-word written assessment should be structured in the following way:
Student number, module title and code, assessment code.
Title: ‘A Comparative Healthcare and Policy Analysis of the UK and USA’.Introduction:
Summary of the different healthcare system models of the UK and USA
Brief outline of the key features of each health care modality alongside a timeline of the policy developments to support them.
Discussion and analysis:
Critically analyse the features and functions of the different healthcare models in the following ways:
Healthcare efficacy and equitability.
Accountable service frameworks linked to the regulation and the erection of patient safety and service quality systems.
A system of monetary and health value.
Conclusion:
Critical summary of the key healthcare features and functions of the different healthcare systems that have been critically examined.
A comparative review of how policies for each healthcare system are being developed to ensure greater healthcare effectiveness and equity for their citizens.
Important note: although the concepts that you present must be related to the taught content, you should be creative when proposing a set of policy developments to improve your chosen healthcare systems.
***As with all assessments, you will need to include citations to support the ideas that you are presenting using Harvard referencing system
Reference list:
As with all assessments, you will need to include citations to support the ideas that you are presenting with the Harvard referencing system. You should also include a list of recent academic literature entries in support of your written assessment and, as with your citations, they must incorporate a Harvard referencing format.
Learning Outcomes:
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
a) Critically analyse different healthcare systems to identify and discuss the key features of a health system.
b) Compare and contrast policy development across different healthcare systems.
e) Communicate and argue information professionally and emphatically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area.
Academic Integrity and Misconduct:
Unless this is a group assessment, the work you produce must be your own, with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. For the avoidance of doubt this means that it is an infringement of academic integrity and, therefore, academic misconduct to ask someone else to carry out all or some of the work for you, whether paid or unpaid, or to use the work of another student whether current or previously submitted.
For further guidance on what constitutes plagiarism, contract cheating or collusion, or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. You will also find useful resources on the VLE: Referencing and Academic Integrity page.
N.B. The penalties for academic misconduct are severe and can include failing the assessment, failing the module and expulsion from the university.
Extensions
No extensions are available for this assessment.
For full details please refer to the Extensions Policy. Extensions are only available for first sits – they are not available for resits.
Mitigating Circumstances:
For guidance on mitigating circumstances please go to Mitigating Circumstances where you will find detailed guidance on the policy as well as guidance and the form for making an application.
Please note, however, that an application to defer an assessment on the grounds of mitigating circumstances should normally be made in advance of the submission deadline or examination date.
Marking Rubric
This is what you will be marked against. You need to check it regularly against your work to ensure you are on the right track.
Learning Outcome (LO)
Distinction (A)
Merit (B)
Commended
(C)
Pass (D)
Fail (F)
UONL Learning Outcomes – Level 6
Work that is distinguished is of very high quality, with a broad knowledge base and demonstrates a sustained ability to analyse key aspects of the assessment tasks.
Work of commendable quality demonstrating a strong conceptual grasp of assessment tasks in relation to learning outcomes.
Work that is of sound quality, demonstrating a good understanding of learning outcomes which is sufficient and appropriate to the task or activity.
Work of a broadly satisfactory quality demonstrates evidence of achieving the requirements of the learning outcomes.
Work falls short of the threshold standards. Work addresses the assessment task to some extent but overall is limited in its approach and is outweighed by major deficiencies in the work
a) Critically analyse different healthcare systems to identify and discuss the key features of a health system
An excellent critical knowledge and comprehensive analysis of the different financing features and functions of different healthcare modalities. A systematic and comprehensive overview of the scope and limitations of their capacity to deliver effective and equitable services within a scheme of regulated and accountable service frameworks for their populations was also evidenced.
Applied academic rigor appropriate to the subject
A very good critical analysis of the different financing features and functions of different healthcare systems.
A strong knowledge of the scope and limitations of their capacity to deliver effective and equitable services within a regulated and accountable service frameworks.
Consistent use of relevant subject-based supporting material to illustrate points
A good critical knowledge and analysis of the different financing features and functions of different healthcare systems. Able to discuss different healthcare systems equitability and regulation and accountability frameworks.
However, there wasn`t sufficient supporting evidence.
Demonstrated knowledge of the different financing features and functions of different healthcare systems. However, parts of the analysis were not clearly linked to healthcare equitability and regulation and accountability frameworks.
Mostly descriptive with little detail and supported with little research.
Some elements of the financing features and functions of different healthcare systems were discussed; however, they were not compared clearly.
The work falls short of this LO threshold expectation.
b) Compare and contrast policy development across different healthcare systems
There was an in-depth comparative analysis of the timelines of policy developments related to the different healthcare system
Excellent knowledge of policy development in different healthcare systems and its relationship with quality and service delivery.
Applied academic rigor
There was a comparative analysis of the timelines of policy developments related to the different healthcare system policies A strong understanding of policy development and the relationship with quality and healthcare service delivery in different healthcare systems.
Consistent use of relevant subject-based supporting material to illustrate points.
Good comparison of different healthcare policy development.
Good understanding of the key policies/regulations of different healthcare systems.
There was evidence of independent research that was substantiated with credible and relevant sources.
However, some errors were evident
Basic/descriptive information provided on policy development in healthcare systems.
Elements of discussion contains irrelevant/inaccurate comparison of
policy developments in different healthcare system.
Insufficient/no relevant supporting literature
There was some discussion of policy developments related to healthcare system However, they were not clearly linked to provision across the different healthcare systems. No evidence of comparison of healthcare systems.
Consequently, the work did not cover this LO threshold expectation
e) Communicate and argue information professionally and emphatically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area
The healthcare system comparative analysis was presented in a logical, systematic and clear sequence, which was appropriate for the set task. The ideas were framed objectively, and the grammar, paragraphing and language showed a high degree of sophistication and accuracy.
The healthcare system and comparative analysis was presented in a logical and clear sequence, which was appropriate for the set task.
The ideas were framed objectively, and the paragraphing and language showed a degree of sophistication.
However, a few grammatical errors were evident in the work.
A comparative healthcare analysis was presented in a logical
and clear sequence, appropriate for the set task.
Most of the ideas were framed objectively, paragraphing and language showed a good degree of proficiency.
However, some grammatical errors were evident in the work.
Comparative analysis of different healthcare systems was mostly logical and coherent.
Ideas are not presented in the required structure.
Contains some grammatical errors.
Presented ideas however appropriate structure was not followed.
Ideas presented are not logical and lacks coherence.
Grammar and spelling errors present
The work did not cover this LO threshold expectation
An Overview of UN3014 Comparative Healthcare Systems Assignment The UN3014 Comparative Healthcare Systems assignment is an in-depth exploration of healthcare structures, policies, and outcomes across different nations. It focuses on critically analysing various healthcare models, comparing their efficiency, accessibility, funding mechanisms, and overall impact on population health. This assignment is particularly useful for students and professionals aiming to understand the strengths and weaknesses of different systems and the key factors influencing healthcare effectiveness globally.
Purpose and Relevance The assignment encourages a comparative analysis of multiple healthcare systems, such as the Beveridge Model (e.g., UK NHS), the Bismarck Model (e.g., Germany), the National Health Insurance Model (e.g., Canada), and the Out-of-Pocket Model (e.g., the United States) . It helps students develop a critical understanding of how socio-economic, political, and cultural factors shape healthcare provision and access.
By comparing healthcare systems, students can assess funding structures (taxation, insurance-based, private pay), health outcomes (life expectancy, infant mortality, disease management), and the efficiency of service delivery (waiting times, quality of care, patient satisfaction) . This knowledge is valuable in shaping healthcare reforms, improving patient care strategies, and identifying best practices that could be adapted to different regions.
Get Fresh Answer: £169 100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
