LO1: Identify risk and vulnerability of children in the family context
CYP 6092: Difficulties Families Face
|
CYP 6092: Difficulties Families Face |
|||||||||||||
|
Assessment Pack contents: Short introduction to the task. Key terms Key resources Template to outline structure and content Rubric to understand marking criteria Video to explain it. |
|||||||||||||
|
Short introduction to the task:
Students are required to research and select one article online to critique in relation to the learning outcomes for the module. The article should be based on an issue or difficulty that a family is experiencing (this cannot be the same topic as the booklet). Students should follow the learning outcomes as a guide in their critique. Step 1: Choose an online newspaper article on a difficulty a family may face
Step 2: Critique the article’s understanding of the difficulty in relation to the learning objectives |
|||||||||||||
|
Key terms Poverty Individual rights Collective responsibilities Lone Parenthood Intervention Anti-racist Vulnerabilities Empowerment |
|||||||||||||
|
Key resources Barlow, J. (2010) Substance misuse the implications of research, policy and practice, London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Buchanan, J. & Carnwell, R. (2009) Effective practice in health, social care, and criminal justice a partnership approach, Maidenhead: Open University Press Cash, T. F. and Smolak, L. (2011) Body image; a handbook of science, practice, and prevention, New York, The Guildford Press Cole, T. (2010) How to Help Children and Young People with Complex Behavioural Difficulties: A Guide for Practitioners, London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Connolly, M. and Morris, K. (2012) Understanding child and family welfare, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Daniel, B., Wassell, S. & Gilligan, R. (2010) Child development for childcare and protection workers, London & Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Davies, M. (2012) Social Work with Children and Families, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Geldard, K. (2012) Practical Interventions for young people at risk, London: Sage Grant, K.B. and Ray, J.A. (2017). Home, School and Community Collaboration. London: Sage. Groen, M. & van Lawick, J. (2009) Intimate warfare – regarding the fragility of family relations, UK: Karnac Books. Harris, B. (2011) Working with distressed young people, Exeter, Learning Matters. Hussein Rassool, G. (2010) Addiction for nurses, Wiley-Blackwell Jones, P. & Welch, S. (2010) Rethinking children`s rights - attitudes in contemporary society (new childhoods), London & New York: Continuum International Publishing Group Koubel, G. and Bungay, H. (2012) Rights, Risks and Responsibilities, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan MacLeod, C. (2011) Adolescence, pregnancy and abortion constructing a threat of degeneration, London/New York: Routledge. Miller-errin, C.L., Perrin, R.D. and Renzetti, C.M. (2017). Violence and Maltreatment in Intimate Relationships. London: Sage. Plant, M.A., Robertson. R., Plant, M. & Miller, P. (2011) Drug Nation - patterns, problems, panics, and policies, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press Ravenhill, M. (2008) The culture of homelessness, Hampshire/Burlington USA: Ashgate Publishing Turner, F.J. (2011) Social work treatment – interlocking theoretical approaches, New York: Oxford University Press |
|||||||||||||
|
Please consider the learning outcomes that you need to cover in your work.
Introduction (200 words) Introduce what you will cover in your Media review. You may wish to consider the following;
Summary of the media article (250 words)
Critique the content in relation to the leaning objectives (1000 words)
Evaluate the sources and evidence used by the article (300 words)
Conclusion (250 words)
Other considerations:
General advice
** The Emphasis is on the CRITIQUE and EVALUATION which is supported by EVIDENCE from your independent research and reading ** EXAMPLES:
The article highlights the risks and vulnerabilities of children born to teenage parents such as . . . . . There are some studies which support the claims made by the author in relating to x,y,z. However the findings reported in the article with regards to . . . is only partially supported by existing research findings. More recent reports demonstrate that . . .
The media article suggests that teenage parents can face a number of difficulties prior to the conception and after the birth as a family such as . .. In support research has shown that . . . . . Other problems families may face include. . . There are a number of support and intervention services available for young parents, as outlined by the writer of the article, such as. . . . Other statutory and voluntary interventions include . . . Effectiveness of interventions and empowerment of families are not referred to in the article. Studies have found that the most effective interventions are characterised by the following . . . and research suggests. . . Empowerment of families can be seen in the following ways. . . . As illustrated by studies by . . .
When discussing teenage parenthood, the article presents a strong political view on the issue as demonstrated by comments such as. . . . The piece partially explains the Government’s role in supporting young parent, and other policy documents include. . . Contemporarily the government have introduced x, y, z, measures which some authors claim are effective in protecting young parents and their children. However Government support has also been criticised due to . . . Authors such as . . . outlined counterarguments which suggest that support should include.
The article pinpoints a number of practitioners who work with teenage parents on both a universal and targeted level, to help support their transition into parenthood and beyond. However when considering the support available, this can be seen in terms of surveillance on the one hand and support on the other by young mothers and fathers. For example, research by x,y,z, has demonstrated that. . . . In opposition studies by x,y,z have shown. . HINT: discuss the Government’s viewpoints of families and how to support them. Link this to what the government actually do! Refer to block 1 info and sessions.
ASSESMENT CHECKLIST
|
|||||||||||||
All assignments must be submitted via Turnitin by 12pm on the deadline day.
Late Submission: Where there is no agreed request for an extension, a deduction of 5 marks will be made for assignments which are submitted in the 24-hour period immediately after the deadline. This means that work submitted one minute after the submission time will lose 5 marks. Subsequent deductions of 5 marks will be made for assignments submitted during subsequent 24-hour periods (not including non-working days), down to a mark of 40% for work of a pass standard (50% for Level 7 modules) and 0% for work of a fail standard. Work submitted more than 5 working days after the deadline will not be marked and a mark of zero will be returned.
Plagiarism is a form of cheating which involves presenting another person’s ideas or expressions without acknowledging the source. The penalties for this are severe. Extensive and repeated instances can result in your removal from the degree programme. It is therefore very important that you understand how to avoid being accused of plagiarism. Any work submitted for assessment must, unless collaborative work has been specifically permitted in the assignment guidelines, be your own work. Any material used, from whatever source, must be clearly acknowledged. Any words that are not your own should be shown as quotes and their author and publication details given. Where you paraphrase the words of another you should make this clear and give details of where you found this material. You should make use of the referencing guidelines on the Library website and complete the online plagiarism tutorial to ensure that you are providing such details correctly https://lib.leedstrinity.ac.uk/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=Referencing. LO1: Identify risk and vulnerability of children in the family context. Doing so will gain you marks for showing evidence of research and ability to reference. Not doing so could lead to accusations of plagiarism. You can also use Turnitin in advance of the deadline to enable you to check for elements of plagiarism in your work and then correct these.
Grading Criteria
|
Classification: Criterion: |
Exceptional First 100, 95, 92 |
Outstanding 1st/Dist 88, 85, 82 |
First/Distinction 78, 75, 72 |
2 (i) 68. 65. 62 |
2 (ii) 58. 55. 52 |
Third 48. 45. 42 |
Fail 38. 35. 32 |
Abject Fail 25, 20, 10, 0 |
|
Knowledge & Understanding |
Polished grasp of subject. Astute and authoritative approach to complexity. |
Comprehensive and confident grasp with strong sense of subject complexity. |
Thorough understanding evident and well applied to question or project. |
Secure, general understanding and reasonable application to question or project. |
Sound knowledge relevant to the question or project. |
Limited knowledge shows basic understanding. Some awareness of the context of the question or project. |
Faulty understanding of question or concepts. Irrelevant or mostly absent content. |
No understanding of question or concepts. Irrelevant or absent content. |
|
Structure, Argument
|
Effective and integrated over-arching argument or structure, clear, insightful synthesis. Highly creative understanding of topic. |
Effective overall argument with clear and insightful connections between claims. Creative understanding of topic. |
Clear and logical focus and direction with valuable connections made between claims. Good level of creativity. |
Well-focused on the question with some clear connections made between claims and some overall direction. Some creativity. |
Addresses the topic with some direction and makes some connections between claims or different parts of artefact/assignment. |
Limited knowledge shows basic understanding. Some awareness of the context of the question or project. |
Lack of argument. Faulty connection between statements. |
No argument. Many faulty connections between statements. |
|
Analysis and Conclusions
|
Original and searching analysis, critical appraisal of task and judicious conclusions. |
Searching analysis with pertinent conclusions drawn. |
Insightful analysis throughout with appropriate conclusions drawn. |
Strong analysis of salient illustrative examples. Some general conclusions drawn. |
Some conclusions drawn based on some reasonable comparisons and examples. |
Basic analysis. Remains descriptive, little evaluation or comparison. Few clear conclusions. |
Insufficient evaluation or attempt to make comparisons. Conclusions illogical insufficient. |
No evaluation or attempt to make comparisons. Conclusions illogical or absent. |
|
Sources & Evidence Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills |
Extensive and evaluative use of evidential support for argument. Flawless referencing or technical skills. |
Extensive use of evidence with some evaluation. Flawless referencing or technical skills. |
Clear support of argument with well selected evidence. Excellent referencing or technical skills. |
Draws on relevant independent sources and evidence to support claims. Consistent and accurate referencing or technical skills. |
Makes simple use of evidence from recommended sources. Largely consistent accurate referencing. or technical skills. |
Relies on superficial statements with little supporting evidence. Limited referencing/ adherence to convention or technical skills. |
Lack of evidence or relevant sources. Inadequate referencing or technical skills. |
No evidence or relevant sources. Inadequate or no referencing or technical skills. |
|
Written/Visual Oral Style & Clarity
|
Professional and sophisticated with exceptional clarity and coherence. Excellent, controlled, confident delivery, pace, and audience engagement. |
Professional and fluent with great clarity and coherence. Confident delivery, pace, and audience engagement. |
Fluent and accurate with great clarity and coherence. Mostly confident delivery, pace, and audience engagement. |
Clear and coherent. Good delivery, pace, and audience engagement |
Some lapses of clarity. Some expression is ineffective. Satisfactory delivery, pace, and audience engagement |
Adequate, but awkward expression throughout with little clarity. Poor delivery, pace, and audience engagement |
Inadequate and unclear presentation. Impaired communication. Error-strewn. |
Grossly inadequate and unclear presentation. Severely impaired communication. Error-strewn. |