Critically assess two temperature sensing technologies and their appropriateness
Assignment Brief
A client wishes to install a line for Beer production, and needs procurement of following sensors:
Temperature sensors for the control of the following processes:
- Kilning process (typically 50-105 C)
- Mashing (62-72 C)
- Fermentation(7-23 C)
- Maturation (0-15 C)
- Pasteurisation (60-70 C)
pH Sensors for Mashing (pH=5.5)
Level, Pressure and Flow sensors, which will enable smooth automated process.
The student needs to help the client with the choice of sensors, and control valves and in order to do so should write report and recommendations on the following topics:
-
Choose two temperature sensing technologies, and critically assess their appropriateness for the use in the described process of beer production from start to end. (Max: 1000 words) (15 marks)
-
Identify some points in the beer production process, where flow sensors could be used. In your opinion, what sensing technologies for flow sensing would be the most appropriate in those cases? (Max 700 words) (10 marks)
-
What are the most common ways of measuring pH? What would you suggest as appropriate technology for pH measurement during mashing process of beer production? Critically assess alternative solutions. (Max 700 words) (10 marks)
- Specify the type and dimension (flow capacity) of a valve to be used in the process of empting tank for fermentation (Figure 1). The valve should be 6m below the level of the bottom of the vessel, and the vessel has max volume capacity of 1800 hectoliters. The vessel can be vented (open) at the top. The vessel is of cylindrical shape, flat at the bottom, and when full the level is 12m. Specify the min flow coefficient of the valve, so that the tank full of beer (with 9% v/v alcohol) and at a normal temperature can be emptied in 45 min. You are allowed to take sensible approximations and assumptions, but more precise calculations, which take account more variables will be higher marked, i.e. for the full mark integro-diferential calculation should be used. (max 1000 words) (15 marks)
(Total 50 marks)
Sample Answer
Beer Production: Sensor and Valve Selection Report
Temperature Sensing Technologies for Beer Production
Temperature control plays a central role in beer production, influencing flavour development, fermentation activity, and overall product consistency. Two technologies that are commonly considered in industrial brewing are Resistance Temperature Detectors (RTDs) and Thermocouples, both of which offer distinct advantages and limitations for the range of processes involved, from kilning and mashing to fermentation, maturation, and pasteurisation.
Resistance Temperature Detectors operate on the principle that the electrical resistance of certain metals, typically platinum, changes in a predictable manner with temperature. The most widely used standard is the Pt100, which has a resistance of 100 ohms at 0°C. RTDs are recognised for their high measurement accuracy, often within ±0.1°C, and their excellent stability over long periods. These qualities make them particularly valuable in processes such as mashing and fermentation, where precise and repeatable temperature control is essential for enzymatic activity and yeast metabolism. They also perform reliably across the brewing temperature spectrum, from near-freezing maturation conditions to the elevated heat of kilning. However, RTDs tend to be more expensive than thermocouples, are relatively delicate in construction, and respond more slowly to rapid temperature fluctuations. This slower response is less critical in stable processes but may be a disadvantage during stages where temperature changes quickly, such as pasteurisation.
Thermocouples, by contrast, function through the thermoelectric effect, generating a voltage when two dissimilar metals are joined and exposed to a temperature difference. They are generally more rugged than RTDs and can be produced in very small diameters, allowing for faster response to temperature changes. In brewing, thermocouples are especially useful in processes where conditions vary rapidly, for example in the pasteurisation stage, where accurate detection of heating and cooling cycles is essential for ensuring microbial safety without over-processing. They are also relatively inexpensive, making them cost-effective for multiple monitoring points across the plant. Nevertheless, thermocouples offer lower accuracy than RTDs, with typical tolerances of ±1°C or more, and may drift over time, requiring periodic recalibration to maintain reliability. For critical brewing stages that demand precise temperature control, this characteristic may limit their suitability unless carefully maintained.
In summary, both RTDs and thermocouples have valid roles in a brewery. RTDs are better suited to processes where accuracy and long-term stability are paramount, such as fermentation and mashing, while thermocouples excel in environments that demand rapid response and robustness, such as pasteurisation or kilning. A hybrid approach, using RTDs for precision-critical steps and thermocouples for fast-response needs, would provide comprehensive and cost-effective temperature monitoring across the full beer production cycle.
Flow Sensors in Beer Production
Flow measurement is essential in beer production to ensure the correct movement of ingredients and final products between processing stages. Accurate flow monitoring helps maintain process consistency, optimises energy use, and supports automated control systems.
Flow sensors would be particularly useful in several key points of the brewing process. During mashing, they can monitor the flow of hot water into the mash tun to maintain the correct liquor-to-grist ratio. In the lautering stage, flow sensors can track wort extraction rates, helping to prevent channel formation and ensuring even filtration. In fermentation, they may be employed to measure the transfer of wort to fermentation vessels. In maturation and conditioning, flow sensors can help control the movement of beer between tanks and into filtration units. Finally, in packaging, they can assist with bottling or kegging lines to ensure consistent fill volumes.
For these applications, electromagnetic flow meters are highly appropriate. They operate on Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction and are ideal for conductive liquids such as wort and beer. They have no moving parts, which reduces maintenance, and provide high accuracy even at varying flow rates. This makes them well suited for both low-viscosity liquids like water and more viscous mixtures like unfiltered wort. Ultrasonic flow meters are another suitable option, especially clamp-on types that allow for non-intrusive measurement, useful where hygiene is paramount. These meters work by sending ultrasonic signals through the liquid and measuring the time difference between transmitted and received pulses. While ultrasonic meters can be slightly more expensive, they offer the advantage of easy installation without interrupting the process.
Continued...