Sample Answer
Essay: Understanding Trait Psychology and Its Key Debates
Stern’s Approaches and Cattell’s Contribution
William Stern (1911) proposed two major approaches to studying personality: the nomothetic and idiographic approaches. The nomothetic method focuses on identifying general laws and traits that can be applied across large populations. For example, psychologists might measure extraversion and agreeableness across thousands of people to identify patterns. The idiographic method, in contrast, emphasises understanding the unique psychological makeup of individuals. A case study of a single person’s motivations and habits, such as Sigmund Freud’s study of “Little Hans,” would fit this approach.
Both approaches reveal different but complementary insights. The nomothetic view provides standardised data for comparison, while the idiographic approach deepens our understanding of human individuality.
Raymond Cattell (1952) expanded this framework by introducing a key criterion for identifying personality traits—traits must demonstrate consistency across time and situations. This was a major contribution, as it set an objective standard for defining what counts as a genuine personality trait. Cattell used statistical tools like factor analysis to test this stability empirically, allowing personality research to become more scientific.
Cattell’s theory led to the identification of surface traits (visible behaviours) and source traits (underlying psychological structures). This distinction aligned well with Stern’s approaches: the nomothetic approach could map general patterns of source traits, while the idiographic approach could explore how these traits interact uniquely within individuals.
In this context, the difference between a personality factor and a personality type becomes clear. A factor refers to a continuous variable like extraversion that varies in degree across individuals, whereas a type is a distinct category, such as being an “introvert” or an “extrovert.” Cattell’s emphasis on measurable factors allowed personality to be studied with greater precision than earlier type theories.
Trait Taxonomies and Factor Analysis
A trait taxonomy is a structured system for categorising personality traits based on their relationships and common patterns. The most well-known modern taxonomy is the Big Five model (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism), which evolved through decades of empirical research.
The development of a taxonomy typically follows a structured process using factor analysis, which identifies clusters of traits that tend to occur together. The main steps of factor analysis are:
-
Data collection: Researchers gather large samples of personality descriptors through surveys or self-reports.
-
Correlation matrix: The relationships among all traits are calculated.
-
Extraction of factors: Statistical methods identify factors explaining shared variance among traits.
-
Rotation: Factors are rotated to improve interpretability, ensuring clearer distinctions between traits.
-
Naming factors: Each factor is labelled according to its dominant traits, such as “extraversion” or “neuroticism.”
The resulting taxonomy reflects how human traits naturally cluster. However, the number of extracted factors is not a natural constant. It depends on methodological choices, including sample diversity, the number of variables, and the statistical criteria used to determine factor retention (like eigenvalues or scree plots).
For example, Cattell identified 16 factors, while Eysenck proposed three (psychoticism, extraversion, neuroticism), and modern psychologists often prefer five. Each system reflects different theoretical goals and statistical thresholds, meaning there is no single “correct” number of traits. The variation highlights that trait structures are influenced by both empirical data and researcher interpretation.
