support@assignmentexperts.co.uk + 44 7340 9595 39
(2) Notifications
Flat 50% OFF on Every Order
Promo Code: FLAT50Chat GPT & Paraphrasing Tool
My Account

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

UK Based Company
Company Registration# 11483120
Address: International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom, E16 2DQ.

LO1: Analyse principles and approaches pertaining to multiagency practice.

Multiagency Working (CYP5005) - Simulated Case Conference Report

Assessment Pack contents: Module intended learning outcomes. A short introduction to the task.

Key terms Key resources

Template to outline structure and content Rubric to understand marking criteria

Module Intended Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of this module, students should be able to:

LO 1: Analyse principles and approaches pertaining to multiagency practice.

LO 2: Reflect upon developments in the understanding of multiagency work.

A short introduction to the task:

The module Multiagency Working (CYP5005) assignment task is a report regarding a simulated case conference (A report is a written piece that identifies and examines issues and events). This report should include a reflective account. I recommend that the report be constructed in five sections, as shown below:

  1. An introduction
  2. The main discussion regarding the case conference
  3. A reflective section
  4. A conclusion
  5. A reference list

WORD COUNT: 2,000 WORDS

Key terms: Collaboration, Autonomy, Agency, Case conference

Key Resources:

 

Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J. & Robinson, M. (2010) Developing Multi-professional Teamwork for Integrated Children’s Services, Maidenhead: Open University Press

Cheminais, R. (2021) Effective Multi-Agency Partnerships: Putting Every Child Matters into Practice, London: Sage

Frost, N., & Robinson, M. (2016) Developing Multi-professional Teamwork for Integrated Children’s Services, Maidenhead: Open University Press Mindfulness – which illnesses benefit.

Journals:

 

 

British Journal of Social Work Journal of Early Childhood Research

International Journal of Early Childhood Journal of Family Issues

Child and Family Social Work

Early Childhood Research and Practice Journal of Child and Family Studies Journal of Troubled Families

Social Work and Social Sciences Review

 

Template:

Introduction (600 words)

This introductory section provides an opportunity for the writer to set the scene and provide some context for the meeting.

The simulated case conference demonstrates multiagency working, therefore, some conceptual analysis regarding multiagency work is pertinent to your introduction.

  • Define multiagency working and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach to professional support for families.
  • Define early help and offer some underpinning legislation and policy, such as Every Child Matters and Children Act 2004.

Section 2 - Main discussion (800 words)

This section should focus on a detailed discussion regarding the simulated case conference.

  • Consider what issues the family was experiencing. Do not simply describe the challenges the family members faced.
  • Consider what the literature says about the challenges. For example, if the family has experienced a bereavement, what does the literature say about the effects of grief?
  • Think about the help offered and use relevant literature to evaluate the effectiveness of the support provided.
  • Discuss any barriers to support the identified problems, for example, communication difficulties and the ability of the family to engage with services. Additionally, contemplate whether sufficient resources are being allocated to the family.
  • Consider how the professionals work together and provide examples of effective collaboration.
  • Consider what steps are taken in the simulated case conference to evaluate the progress of multiagency working.

Section 3 - Reflective section (400 words)

In this section, reflect on what you learned regarding multi-agency work. Having participated in a module that focuses on this approach to helping people, consider:

  • What do you feel are the most challenging aspects of multiagency working?
  • Why is that so? Think how your learning has helped prepare you for this approach to professional practice. You can include specific examples of your formal learning, such as a topic you have developed your knowledge of. You may also discuss experiential learning; for example, you may have observed a leader who worked in a collaborative and inclusive way, and this inspired you.
  • End your reflective section with some insights into your developmental plans; for example, you may prioritize a particular form of work experience.

Conclusion (200 words)

This is your chance to bring your report`s themes together and make some recommendations.

  • Summarise and conclude the main points in your assignment.
  • Do not add new information here!

Reference list (not included in the word count)

Your report must include references from pertinent literature.

  • Use appropriate academic language and terminology.
  • Correct APA referencing style in the text and reference list.
  • Proofread.

Rubric used to mark:

 

100, 95, 92

Thank you for submitting this assignment; please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation. Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Polished grasp of multiagency working. Astute and authoritative approach to its

complexity.

Structure and argument (30%)

Effective and integrated over-arching argument or structure, clear, insightful synthesis. Highly creative understanding of multiagency working.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Original and searching analysis, critical appraisal of task, and judicious conclusions.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Extensive and evaluative use of evidential support for argument. Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%) Flawless referencing or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

 

 

 

Professional and sophisticated with exceptional clarity and coherence. Excellent reader engagement.

82,85,88

Thank you for submitting this assignment; please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation. Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Comprehensive and confident grasp of multiagency working with strong sense of its complexity.

Structure and argument (30%)

Effective overall argument with clear connections between claims. Creative understanding of Multiagency working.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Searching analysis with pertinent conclusions drawn.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Extensive use of evidence with some evaluation.

Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%)

Flawless referencing or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

Professional and fluent with great clarity and coherence. Confident delivery.

72, 75, 78

Thank you for submitting this assignment; please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation. Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Thorough understanding evident and well applied to specific assessment task

Structure and argument (30%)

Clear and logical focus and direction with valuable connections made between claims—good level of creativity.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Insightful analysis throughout, with appropriate conclusions drawn.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Clear support of argument with well-selected evidence. Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%) Excellent referencing or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity  (5%)

Fluent and accurate with great clarity and coherence. Mostly confident delivery and reader engagement.

 

 

62, 65, 68

 

 

Thank you for submitting this assignment. Please read the feedback to improve your work in the future

This grade is subject to moderation. Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Secure,    general   understanding   of   multiagency   working   and   reasonable

application to the case conference report.

Structure and argument (30%)

Well-focused on the question with some clear connections made between claims and some overall direction. Some creativity.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Strong analysis of salient illustrative examples. Some general conclusions were drawn.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Draws on relevant independent sources and evidence to support claims. Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%) Consistent and accurate referencing or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

Clear and coherent. Good delivery and reader engagement.

 

 

52, 55, 58

Thank you for submitting this assignment. Please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation. Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Sound knowledge of multiagency working relevant to the case conference report.

Structure and argument (30%)

Addresses the topic with some direction and makes some connections between claims or different parts of the report.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Some conclusions drawn based on some reasonable comparisons and examples.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Makes simple use of evidence from recommended sources. Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%) Largely consistent, accurate referencing. or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

Some lapses of clarity. Some expressions are ineffective.

 

 

42, 45, 48

Thank you for submitting this assignment. Please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation.

 

 

Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Limited knowledge of multiagency working shows basic understanding - some awareness of the context of the report.

Structure and argument (30%)

Argument is weak and difficult to detect. Connections made between statements limited within the report.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Basic analysis. Remains descriptive, little evaluation or comparison. Few clear conclusions.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Relies on superficial statements with little supporting evidence. Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%) Limited referencing/ adherence to convention or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

Adequate, but awkward expression throughout with little clarity. Poor delivery.

 

 

15-38

Thank you for submitting this assignment please read the feedback to improve your work in the future.

This grade is subject to moderation Knowledge and Understanding (30%)

Faulty understanding of the report or concepts. Irrelevant or mostly absent

content.

Structure and argument (30%)

Lack of argument. Faulty connection between statements in the report.

Analysis and conclusion (20%)

Insufficient evaluation or comparisons. Conclusions insufficient.

Sources and evidence (10%)

Lack of evidence or relevant sources.

Adherence to Referencing Conventions, Technical Skills (5%)

Inadequate referencing or technical skills.

Written Style & Clarity (5%)

Inadequate and unclear presentation. Impaired communication.

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

paypal checkout

The services provided by Assignment Experts UK are 100% original and custom written. We never use any paraphrasing tool, any software to generate content for e.g. Chat GPT and all other content writing tools. We ensure that the work produced by our writers is self-written and 100% plagiarism-free.

Discover more


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guaranteed

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

Recent Papers

We're Open