Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations.
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
MOD009384 Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care
|
Assessment |
Practical - Presentation |
|
Assessment code: |
010 |
|
Academic Year: |
2025/2026 |
|
Trimester: |
2 |
|
Module Title: |
Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care |
|
Module Code: |
MOD009384 |
|
Level: |
7 |
|
Module Leader: |
|
|
Weighting: |
40% |
|
Time Limit: |
7 minutes per student |
|
Assessed Learning Outcomes |
LO3: Intellectual, practical, affective and transferrable skills: Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations. |
|
Assessment date: |
Please refer to the deadline on the VLE |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
- This is an individual assignment.
- No extensions are available for this assessment.
- Exceptional Circumstances: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Studies Team - DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. See rules 6.112 6.141:
http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf
ASSESSMENT
The Board of the organisation you consult for (same as the one used for your written report) are well aware of the direct relationship between personality types and how individuals lead, communicate and make decisions in an organisation, as prescribed in Galen’s Four Temperament Theory, namely: Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholy and Phlegmatic. An ongoing selection process for the role of CEO in the organisation requires your expert opinion in the final stage of the process.
YOUR PRESENTATION
The Board have invited you to a 7-minute PowerPoint presentation on one personality type that you consider will be most suitable for the role of CEO in order to drive performance and motivation in the organisation. You must demonstrate that you have critically evaluated all the four temperament types in order to arrive at your choice of personality type. (100 marks)
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Your performance will be assessed with reference to the below criteria:
-
Demonstrable awareness of the two personality types with regards to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team building, in a health and social care organisation (70 marks).
-
Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories (20 marks).
-
Clarity of communication, Professionalism, Confidence, and Persuasiveness (10 marks)
READING REQUIREMENT
Bratton, J. 2023. Organisational Leadership [2nd Edition]. UK: SAGE. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library
Pease, G., Beresford, B., Walker, L. 2014. Developing Human Capital (1st Edition). Wiley. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library
ASSESSMENT MARKING RUBRIC
The work will be assessed in an integrative manner as indicated in the marking rubric, that is consistent with Anglia Ruskin University generic assessment criteria and marking standards
Criteria / Grade (marking areas and scores to be adapted by ML according to assessment) | 0-29% | 30-39% | 40-49% | 50-59% | 60-69% | 70-79% | 80-89% | 90-100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demonstrable awareness of the four personality types with regards to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team building, in a health and social care organisation | Little evidence of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building. Little identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Little evidence of use of taught contents and little evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate. | Limited evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Limited identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Limited evidence of use of taught contents and limited evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Adequate evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Adequate identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Adequate evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Sound evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building. Sound identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Sound evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Good evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Good identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Good evidence of use of taught contents and good evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Excellent evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Excellent identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Excellent evidence of use of taught contents and excellent evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Outstanding evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Outstanding identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Outstanding evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate | Exceptional evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Exceptional identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Exceptional evidence of use of taught contents and exceptional evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate |
| 70 Marks | 0-20 | 21-27 | 28-34 | 35-41 | 42-48 | 49-55 | 56-62 | 63-70 |
| Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relavant theories | Little to Sound evidence of use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types | Good use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types | Excellent use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types | Outstanding use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types | Exceptional use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types | |||
| 20 Marks | 0-6 | 6-7 | 8-9 | 10-11 | 12-13 | 14-15 | 16-17 | 18-20 |
| Clarity of communication, Professionalism, Confidence, and Persuasiveness | Little clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Limited clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Adequate clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Sound clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Good clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Excellent clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Outstanding clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types | Exceptional clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types |