Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations.

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

MOD009384 Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care

Assessment

Practical - Presentation

Assessment code:

010

Academic Year:

2025/2026

Trimester:

2

Module Title:

Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care

Module Code:

MOD009384

Level:

7

Module Leader:

 

Weighting:

40%

Time Limit:

7 minutes per student

Assessed Learning Outcomes

LO3: Intellectual, practical, affective and transferrable skills:

Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations.

Assessment date:

Please refer to the deadline on the VLE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • This is an individual assignment.
  • No extensions are available for this assessment.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Studies Team - DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. See rules 6.112 6.141:

http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

ASSESSMENT

The Board of the organisation you consult for (same as the one used for your written report) are well aware of the direct relationship between personality types and how individuals lead, communicate and make decisions in an organisation, as prescribed in Galen’s Four Temperament Theory, namely: Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholy and Phlegmatic. An ongoing selection process for the role of CEO in the organisation requires your expert opinion in the final stage of the process.

YOUR PRESENTATION

The Board have invited you to a 7-minute PowerPoint presentation on one personality type that you consider will be most suitable for the role of CEO in order to drive performance and motivation in the organisation. You must demonstrate that you have critically evaluated all the four temperament types in order to arrive at your choice of personality type. (100 marks)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Your performance will be assessed with reference to the below criteria:

  1. Demonstrable awareness of the two personality types with regards to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team building, in a health and social care organisation (70 marks).

  2. Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories (20 marks).

  3. Clarity of communication, Professionalism, Confidence, and Persuasiveness (10 marks)

READING REQUIREMENT

Bratton, J. 2023. Organisational Leadership [2nd Edition]. UK: SAGE. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library

Pease, G., Beresford, B., Walker, L. 2014. Developing Human Capital (1st Edition). Wiley. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library

ASSESSMENT MARKING RUBRIC

The work will be assessed in an integrative manner as indicated in the marking rubric, that is consistent with Anglia Ruskin University generic assessment criteria and marking standards

Criteria / Grade (marking areas and scores to be adapted by ML according to assessment)

0-29%30-39%40-49%50-59%60-69%70-79%80-89%90-100%
Demonstrable awareness of the four personality types with regards to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team building, in a health and social care organisation Little evidence of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building. Little identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Little evidence of use of taught contents and little evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate. Limited evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Limited identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Limited evidence of use of taught contents and limited evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Adequate evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Adequate identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Adequate evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Sound evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building. Sound identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Sound evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Good evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Good identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Good evidence of use of taught contents and good evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Excellent evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building. Excellent identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Excellent evidence of use of taught contents and excellent evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Outstanding evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Outstanding identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Outstanding evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate Exceptional evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building. Exceptional identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities. Exceptional evidence of use of taught contents and exceptional evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate
70 Marks 0-20 21-27 28-34 35-41 42-48 49-55 56-62 63-70
Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relavant theories Little to Sound evidence of use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types Good use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types Excellent use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types Outstanding use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types Exceptional use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types
20 Marks 0-6 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-20
Clarity of communication, Professionalism, Confidence, and Persuasiveness Little clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Limited clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Adequate clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Sound clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Good clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Excellent clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Outstanding clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types Exceptional clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

All About MOD009384 Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care Assignment

MOD009384 is not a module where you can get away with writing broad points about “good leadership” and “teamwork”. It goes deeper than that. This unit is about how leadership actually works inside health and social care settings, and how people are managed, supported, developed, and retained in organisations where pressure, responsibility, and staff wellbeing all matter at the same time. Anglia Ruskin University’s module summary says the module focuses on leadership and human capital management in healthcare, including decision-making, communication, conflict resolution, talent management, and team development.

In simple words, this assignment is usually testing whether you understand that staff are not just “workers” on a rota. In health and social care, people are the main resource of the organisation. Their skills, judgement, attitude, motivation, training, and emotional strength directly affect service quality, patient safety, and the overall performance of the organisation. That is why leadership and human capital management sit so closely together in this module.

A publicly available assessment brief for MOD009384 shows that students may be asked to act like a human capital development consultant and evaluate how an organisation’s leadership style and culture affect employee development and financial competitiveness. The same brief also highlights three main areas: leadership and management concepts, organisational culture and team dynamics, and emotional intelligence in leading people in health and social care.

What makes this assignment difficult is that it is not only about theory. You are normally expected to apply theory to a real health or social care organisation. That means you may need to look at how leadership style affects staff morale, whether the culture supports learning and accountability, whether teams work well together, and whether managers handle pressure, conflict, and communication in a mature way. In this kind of assignment, it is never enough to just define leadership models and leave them there.

One of the biggest things this unit is really asking is: what kind of leadership helps people perform better in health and social care? For example, if leadership is too controlling, staff may feel unheard, stressed, and unwilling to contribute ideas. If leadership is supportive and emotionally intelligent, staff are more likely to feel valued, improve their skills, and stay engaged with their work. In a health and social care setting, that difference can affect everything from teamwork and retention to care quality and service outcomes. This fits directly with the module’s focus on communication, conflict resolution, team development, and people management.