Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

1. Critically evaluate and apply tools and theories that inform strategic decision making

Assessment Brief: Component A

Assessment overview

Module leader

 

Main contact for assessment questions

Module tutor for units 1-5. Please see Moodle for details.

Format

Practitioner report

Weighting

50%

Assessment wordcount

2000 words +/-10% OR 10 minute recorded Powerpoint presentation (further information provided below)

Deadline

See Moodle

Note that:

  • Assessments submitted late but within 7 days of the deadline will be capped at 50%.

  • Assessments submitted more than 7 days late will receive a Fail.

Submission

Submission via Turnitin (located under the Assessment Submission and Feedback section on Moodle)

Module learning outcomes assessed

1 and 2

Assessment Regulations

All assessments are subject to the University Regulations.

Module number and title 

HRM11419 Leading Strategic Decision Making

Assessment format

For the assessment, you are required to produce ONE of the following:

  1. A 2000-word reflective report

  2. A 10-minute recorded presentation. Your presentation should be produced using PowerPoint and should include PowerPoint slides and a recorded oral presentation. You can include as many slides as you like.

Both options 1 and 2 will be assessed using the marking matrix provided at the end of this document.

It is entirely your choice whether to do a written report or a recorded presentation. When making your decision, consider:

  • Which format best suits your skills.

  • Which format will help you to develop skills relevant to future employment.

  • Which format you will most enjoy.

Wordcount

Written report

The maximum word count of the report is 2,000 words. To help you to structure your report you may wish to follow these guidelines:

  • Introduction and background section: 200 words

  • Strategic position analysis: 1100 words

  • Recommendation: 500 words

  • Conclusion: 200 words

The word limit for Component A does not include the title page, executive summary, table of contents, reference lists, tables and diagrams, and appendix.

The word count is subject to a ±10% allowance. Where a submission exceeds the stated word limit (allowing for the +10%), the maximum grade awarded will be 50%.

Appendices can be useful to provide additional information from your analysis, but you must incorporate the key analytical arguments into the main body of your answer.

Recorded presentation

The maximum length of the presentation is 10 minutes. To help you to structure your presentation you may wish to follow these guidelines:

  • Introduction and background section: 1 minute

  • Strategic position analysis: 5-6 minutes

  • Recommendation: 2-3 minutes

  • Conclusion: 1 minute

The time limit for Component A does not include the title page, executive summary, table of contents, reference lists, tables and diagrams, and appendix.

The length is subject to a ±10% allowance, i.e. your presentation can be up to 1 minute over or under the specified length. Where a submission exceeds the stated length (allowing for the +10%), the maximum grade awarded will be 50%.

Learning outcomes

Assessment Component A will assess you against module learning outcome 1 and 2:

  1. Critically evaluate and apply tools and theories that inform strategic decision making

  2. Critically review how effective leaders foster innovation in contemporary organisational contexts

Purpose and rationale

You are being asked to do this assessment task to assess your learning against learning outcomes 1 and 2, as stated above.

The assessment task has been designed to help you to develop skills and knowledge relevant to a contemporary workplace.

Requirements for the assessment

Overview

In this assessment, you will identify a key player in the agricultural and food sector of any country/region. After selecting a company of your choice, you are required to produce a report including:

  • An analysis of the company’s strategic position

  • Strategic recommendations, with a focus on how to implement a sustainable strategy to decarbonise its activities.

Background

The agricultural and food sector contributes to 25% of carbon emissions in the world. Governments, NGOs and private organisations are investing significant sums of money to develop alternate ways to produce sustainable crops. But there is still a long way to go. Alongside this, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have set out a clear vision for 2030 and there is an increasing need for organisations of all kinds to consider these goals when developing their strategy.

Scenario

Following the successful completion of your Masters degree course, you have secured a strategy consultant job in a top-tier consultancy firm. You are attending the first meeting with your team. Your line manager asks you to introduce yourself to colleagues and share your passion for strategy and sustainability. You explain with brio how future business winners need to implement today sustainable strategies for tomorrow.

Task

Enthused by what you enthusiastically conveyed about sustainable strategy, your line manager is keen to test your strategic planning skills. Your manager asks you to select an organisation of your choice in the agricultural and food sector.

Your task is:

  • To produce a strategic position analysis for the company of your choice.

  • To make recommendations to adapt the company’s strategy for a sustainable future.

You are expected to gather relevant information about the sector and the company of your choice, and to use frameworks and models introduced in the lectures, textbook and academic sources covered in the module. You should use diagrams and tables to illustrate your core ideas.

Note – If tables and diagrams are used we advise that these are created within the document/presentation using word/powerpoint. This will help to ensure that they are good quality with clear and readable text. If it is necessary to paste an image of a diagram/table into the assessment please ensure that the source of that image is clearly stated. If you are the author, please state ‘authors own’.

Structure

Given that your report/presentation is going to be shared with the senior management team, the line manager suggests the following structure:

  1. Title

  2. Executive summary 

  3. Table of contents

  4. Introduction

  5. Strategic Position Analysis

    1. A description and critical examination of the internal and external analytical techniques that will be applied in section 5b and 5c.

    2. External Analysis: Macroenvironment and Industry Analysis

    3. Internal Analysis: Analysis of resources and capabilities

  6. SWOT resulting from the analysis

    1. External (Opportunities and Threats)

    2. Internal (Strengths and Weaknesses)

  7. Recommendations for sustainable strategy 

  8. Conclusion

  9. Reference list

  10. Appendix

Content guidance notes

The title should be concise and should reflect the focus of your report.

The executive summary should be approximately 10% of the length of your report (approximately 200 words or 1 minute). If you choose to do a recorded presentation you should read out your executive summary.

The University of Melbourne have produced a helpful video providing guidance on what to include in your executive summary. This can be found here: https://students.unimelb.edu.au/academic-skills/resources/reading,-writing-and-referencing/reports/executive-summaries

The table of contents should ideally be produced using the ‘table of contents’ feature in word.  Please see the guidance here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/insert-a-table-of-contents-882e8564-0edb-435e-84b5-1d8552ccf0c0 If you are not familiar with the headings feature in word (you must use heading in order to automatically create a contents page) you can find guidance here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/office/insert-a-table-of-contents-882e8564-0edb-435e-84b5-1d8552ccf0c0. If you choose to do a recorded presentation, please list the presentation content at the start of the presentation.

The introduction should set the scene and explain both the importance of sustainability and the SDGs to the agricultural sector, and the need to perform this strategic position analysis. Relevant figures and data should be used to reinforce the background. The introduction should present an overview of the report.

Strategic position analysis: This section should start with a description, and critical review, of the techniques that you intend to use to analyses your chosen company’s strategic position. In this section you should provide a detailed description of the technique, a discussion of its strengths and limitations, and a justification for its use in your report (i.e. why is the technique chosen appropriate for the context). Your description and critical review should be based on reading of academic literature.

Secondly, this section should focus on the external part of the strategic analysis. You should support your analysis using relevant frameworks and evidence from literature. The frameworks should be clearly described, with the help of tables/diagrams where appropriate. You should explain why you have selected the framework/s, considering their suitability to the context you have chosen, and their strengths and limitations.  All elements from the external environment influencing the organisation’s strategy should be considered.

Thirdly, this section focuses on the internal part of the strategic analysis. You should support your analysis using relevant frameworks and evidence from literature. The frameworks should be clearly described, with the help of tables/diagrams where appropriate. You should explain why you have selected the framework/s, considering their suitability to the context you have chosen, and their strengths and limitations.  All elements associated with the internal focus of the organisation should be considered.

This section should culminate in a SWOT analysis that summaries the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats identified in the preceding external and internal analysis

Note: Rember the background to this assessment – your strategic analysis and SWOT should focus on sustainability and the SDGs!

Recommendations and Conclusion: The recommendations should be Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant and Time-bound (SMART) and should recommend a clear strategy for a sustainable future for your chosen organisation.

Reading to evidence your work

You must support your statements with evidence, doing this via in-text citations and adding a list of references. In addition to company specific sources used in your analysis, you should use at least 10 high quality sources (inclusive of books, academic peer-reviewed articles and formal sources) to develop your understanding of the frameworks used. Please note that failure to use the minimum number of sources will have a negative impact on your grade and may result in you failing the assessment.

The essential reading from units 1-5 will help you to understand key frameworks and to perform the strategic position analysis for this assessment.

Presentation and referencing

Reflective report

A good piece of work is attractively styled and logically structured, with a high standard of written English.  The report should be written using British English spelling: avoid “z’s” such as “organization” and use the standard British English spelling of “organisation”, “behaviour”, “centre”, etc.

Use the report format and include appropriate headings. Do not label the body of your report as “main body” and do not use long questions as headings; instead, use descriptive headings which signpost the content of each section. A contents page should be included at the start of the report (please see guidance below).

Format your report using a professional font (e.g. Calibri or Arial), and use 1.5 line spacing.

Appendices can be useful to provide additional information, but you must incorporate the key arguments into the main body of your report. Any appendices should be referred to in your report.

Recorded presentation

Recorded presentations should be created using PowerPoint.

The slides

A good presentation is attractively styled and logically structured, with a high standard of written English.

  • Avoid putting too much information on each slide. Use bullet points rather than block of text to covey the most important information. Remember that you presentation will be accompanied by a recorded oral presentation so you don’t need to cover all information in your slides.

  • Use a limited colour pallet, and ensure that coloured text is visible by using high contrast colours.

  • Use a professional font, such as Calibri or Arial, and ensure that your font is consistent throughout the presentation

  • Think carefully about the size of text. In general, avoid using text smaller that 18pt.

  • Include images to make you slide more attractive BUT only do so if the images are relevant and enhance the slides.

Your presentation should be written using British English spelling: avoid “z’s” such as “organization” and use the standard British English spelling of “organisation”, “behaviour”, “centre”, etc.

The oral presentation

The video below explains how to record a presentation in PowerPoint.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOEdiIV31_s

Please note that you should not save your presentation as a video. Please see the information in ‘File format and naming’.

Here are some tips that will help you to produce a clear oral presentation:

  • Write some notes, or a script. This will help you to create a clear and well-structured presentation that covers all the required information.

  • Speak clearly and take care not to speak too quickly. You may need to speak more slowly that you would when talking to a friend.

  • Record your presentation in a quiet location. Background noise can make the presentation difficult to hear; and if we can’t hear you, we have nothing to mark!

  • Listen back to your presentation. I know that this can be an uncomfortable experience, but it is important to ensure that your presentation is clear.

  • Make sure that what you say in the recording and what you present on your slides match up!

  • As demonstrated in the video above, you can turn on your camera during the recording. Ideally, we would like you to have your camera on. This will make your presentation more engaging and will make your oral presentation easier to follow. However, you can record your oral presentation with the camera off if you prefer.

Citing and referencing

Any sources used to inform your essay should be cited, and all the works cited must be referenced. References and citation must be correctly formatted using the APA Referencing system, and should adopt a consistent font.

Please use the Citing and Referencing checklist (available on Moodle under ‘Academic Skills and Support’) to self-assess whether you have met the core citing and referencing requirements.

Do not cut and paste phrases or paragraphs from published material without citing your sources. You should seek to use your own words to explain concepts and theories while acknowledging the work of other scholars through proper referencing, both in-text and reference list. Please refer to the University guidance notes on the avoidance of plagiarism.

Use of AI in assessments

Use

Permitted?

Advice

How to acknowledge use

As a search engine

Yes

Cross reference AI output for factual accuracy in authoritative texts e.g. textbooks, reading lists, peer-reviewed publications

On cover sheet:

“I used [tool name] on [date] with the question [insert question/prompt used] to help me [insert reason]. I used this in [section name] of this submission”

As an ideas generator/ conversational partner/ debating partner

With caution

Cross reference for accuracy as above AND check for bias, irrelevant or too generalised ideas.

On cover sheet:

“I used [tool name] on [date] with the question [insert question/prompt used] to give me ideas, of which I used/adapted into [idea name] in this submission”

To suggest a submission structure

With caution

Consult the assessment brief first to ensure your structure follows the recommendations and meets the learning outcomes.

On cover sheet:

“I used [tool name] on [date] with the question [insert question/prompt used] to get a submission structure, which I used/adapted into [part name] in this submission”

To make suggestions to improve your communication of your ideas

With caution

Always start with your own writing first to develop your own thinking. Use the AI tool to get quick feedback and use your judgement whether its advice is appropriate for your submission. Work on one paragraph at a time.

On cover sheet:

“I used [tool name] on [date] with the question [insert question/prompt used] on [section name(s)/whole submission] to get feedback on my writing, which I then improved based on its advice on [spelling/grammar/vocabulary/etc.]

To generate content

No

Never ask an AI tool to generate parts of your submission from scratch. Do not input assessment brief or rubric into AI tools and ask it to generate your submission.

 

Further guidance on the use of artificial intelligence can be found here:

Note that by using AI when it is not permitted you will be engaging in Academic Misconduct.

Where AI has been used, you need to acknowledge what you have used it for, and the extent to which it has been included in the submitted work. In particular, you should:

  1. Complete the acknowledgement on the coursework coversheet declaring the extent to which you have used AI.

  2. Write a short (about 100 words) reflective statement on the cover sheet that explains:

    1. Which technologies you have used

    2. Specific/explicit description of how the information was generated, i.e. the prompts used etc.

    3. Explain how the AI output was used in your work, e.g., how it was adapted to the context of your assessment etc.

    4. Explain why you used this and its business application.

Your assessments are required to be solely your own work. They are a means for you to demonstrate what you have learned. Inappropriate use of Generative AI, such as the direct use of generated content presented in an assessment submission as your own work, constitutes a form of cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.

Statement on inclusion

For Component A you have a choice to either do a written report or a recorded presentation depending on your skills and preference.

You will be supported to develop the skills and knowledge needed for this assessment in the Live Academic Sessions, where you will have the opportunity to ask questions and check your understanding.

The first two formative assessments will also provide you with an oppotunity to check your understanding.

Arrangements for submission

Your assessment should be submitted via the submission link that can be located under the Assessment Submission and Feedback section on Moodle.

Your work must be submitted with the appropriate cover sheet which must confirm that the assignment is your own and has not been submitted for another assessment.

File format and naming

Assessments MUST be submitted as either a word file (.doc/.docx) or powerpoint (.pptx). We will not be able to read any other file formats.

Please note that we have to mark what you submit. If you submit the wrong version of your coursework (for example, an incomplete version) this will have a negative impact on your grade. Please make sure that you clearly name the final version of your coursework, and double check that you have uploaded the correct version BEFORE submitting.

Late submission

Assessments submitted late, but within 7 days of the deadline, will be capped at 50%.

If you submit your assessment more than 7 days after the deadline you will be awarded a Fail. You will have a second opportunity to submit, however your grade for the module will be capped at 50% (a pass). This means that the maximum grade you will be able to get for this module will be a 50%, even if the quality of your work is higher than a pass.

Extensions to the deadline

If you have any concerns about meeting the assessment deadline you can, in some circumstances, request an extension. All of the information you need can be found here: https://my.napier.ac.uk/your-studies/academic-issues/extenuating-circumstances

To request an extension, please download and complete the RE1 form from the link above and email it to the module leader and to the relevant assessment tutor.

Note that it takes time for us to confirm whether an extension has been granted or decline, so please avoid leaving extension request to the last minute. Extension requests submitted after the deadline WILL NOT be considered.

Draft checking facility

You can submit up to three drafts of your report to the draft checking linking. This will enable you to view a Turnit in report and check for any errors in citing and referencing. Information on Turnitin, and guidance on reading a Turnit in report can be found on the module Moodle page, and via the Univerisity website.

Grading and feedback

Your work will be assessed against a series of marking criteria. You will be awarded a percentage between 0 and 100% against each of the criterion. Your criterion grades will help you to understand where your strengths lie and the areas that you need to improve.

Using your criterion grades as a guide, the marker will then make a holistic assessment of the quality of your work, and award you an overall percentage.

Fail

Pass

Merit

Distinction

0-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-100%

In addition to receiving a grade, you will also be provided with written feedback on each criterion. Your feedback will explain what you did well, and what you could have improved. It is essential that you engage with the feedback provided as this will help you to improve in future assessments, both in this module and in other modules that you are taking.

Grades and feedback will be released 15 working days after the submission deadline.

To view you grade and feedback you will need to click on the submission link and open your assessment. To the right-hand side of your submission you will see a series of icons. Click on the pencil icon to view written feedback and the grid icon to view your criteria marks.

Assessment regulations

All assessments at Edinburgh Napier University are subject to the University’s Academic Regulations, Academic Integrity Regulations, Student Community Code. Students are expected to adhere to the Student Community Code and maintain acceptable standards of academic practice, as set out in the Academic Integrity Regulations

Assessment criteria

Criteria

Distinction

Merit

Pass

Marginal Fail

Fail

Critical review and evaluation of analytical techniques used by strategic leaders (LO1)

 

40% of assessment mark

Demonstrates a comprehensive and critical knowledge of relevant analytical techniques.

 

Critical knowledge has been developed through engagement with, and correct acknowledgement of, a wide range of appropriate and up to date sources, with a strong focus on academic literature. The literature has been well integrated into the assessment to strengthen the arguments being made.

 

Demonstrates a very good knowledge of relevant analytical techniques. Very good critical thinking, that could be further improved through greater depth and/or breadth of application.

 

Critical knowledge has been developed through engagement with, and appropriate acknowledgement of, an effective range of appropriate sources. Improved selection and/or integration of literature would have further strengthened arguments being made. 

Demonstrates a good awareness and developing understanding of relevant analytical techniques, with evidence of some critical ability that needs further development.

 

Understanding has been developed through engagement with an acceptable range of relevant literature. Demonstration of critical thinking could have been improved through use of a wider range of literature, improved acknowledgement and/or better integration of the literature.

Some awareness and understanding of relevant analytical techniques. Provides a largely descriptive account with limited evidence of critical ability.

 

Understanding is based on a limited range of literature that may also be of poor quality. Evidence of understanding and critical thinking is weakened by the large number of unsupported generalisation and assertions.

 

 

Poorly developed understanding and critical ability resulting in a descriptive account of the chosen analytical technique. Some significant gaps in knowledge and understanding and/or evidence that knowledge is incomplete or superficial.

 

Understanding is based on a very limited range and/or inappropriate selection of literature, with a large number of unsupported generalisation and assertions.

70-100%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

0-39%

Application of the analytical techniques, such as the PESTEL, Porter five forces model, value chain analysis, VRIO and SWOT, used to foster innovation in organisations (LO1)

 

30% of assessment mark

 

 

The nature and context of the case study has been carefully and fully considered in the selection and application of the analytical technique.

 

Immaculately presented charts and tables have been appropriately used to clearly and concisely convey the required information.

The nature and context of the case study have been well considered in the selection and application of the analytical technique. More detailed consideration and/or clearer explanations of the implications of context would have further improved the application.

 

Well presented charts and tables have been appropriately used and clearly convey the required information.

Some consideration has been given to the nature and context of the case study in the selection and application of the analytical technique.

 

Charts and tables have been used but could have been applied more extensively and/or more clearly convey the required information.

Limited consideration has been given to the nature and context of the case study in the selection and application of the analytical technique.

 

Limited application of charts and tables. Where charts and table have been used, they may be underdeveloped and unclear.

Takes a “one size fits all” approach which shows no appreciation of how the nature of the organisation and its environment will influence the application of analytical technique.

 

No/very limited application of charts and tables. Where charts and table have been used, they may be underdeveloped and unclear.

70-100%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

0-39%

Formulation of recommendations that will foster sustainable innovation. (LO2)

 

30% of assessment mark

 

 

Very clear and innovative recommendations that are fully justified by the analysis presented.

 

Recommendation are SMART and comprehensively consider the case study context.

 

A clear structure, professional presentation and consistent and concise academic writing/presentation style helps to convince the reader that recommendations are carefully thought through and compelling.

Very clear recommendations that are follow on logically from the analysis presented. The recommendations demonstrate skills in innovative thinking.

 

Recommendation are SMART and demonstrate good consideration of the case study context.

 

A clear structure, professional presentation and good academic writing/presentation style helps to convince the reader that recommendations are carefully thought through and compelling.

Recommendations are sensible but may be insufficiently explained, and/or not fully justified by the analysis presented. A standard approach has been taken in the recommendation, with limited evidence of innovative thinking.

 

Recommendations are realistic but needed to be more SMART, and/or needed to more carefully consider of the case study context.

 

An appropriate structure and writing/presentation style, and neat presentation helps to convince the reader that recommendations are carefully thought through. Further improvements to written expression and consistency of formatting would have made the recommendations more compelling.

Recommendations have been made and have some foundation in the analysis presented.

 

The recommendations may be unrealistic and/or show limited consideration of the case study context.

 

Inconsistencies in formatting, and an informal or unclear writing/presentation style further contributes to recommendations that are unconvincing and dissuasive.  

No recommendations are presented and/or recommendations have no basis in previous analysis.

 

Where recommendations are made, they are likely to be unrealistic, with no/very limited consideration of the case study context.

 

Inconsistencies in formatting, and an informal or unclear writing/presentation style results in recommendations that are unconvincing and dissuasive. 

70-100%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

0-39%

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

What Is the HRM11419 Leading Strategic Decision Making Unit About?

The HRM11419 Leading Strategic Decision Making module focuses on how organisations analyse their internal and external environments to make effective long-term strategic decisions. Students learn how strategic leaders use analytical tools such as PESTEL, Porter`s Five Forces, VRIO, Value Chain Analysis, and SWOT to assess business performance and identify future opportunities. The module also explores the growing importance of sustainability, innovation, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in industries facing environmental challenges. Through strategic analysis, students develop the ability to evaluate business environments and recommend practical strategies that create sustainable competitive advantage.

Why Do Students Struggle With This Assignment?

This assessment is often difficult because it requires students to combine academic theory, critical analysis, sustainability knowledge, and real-world business strategy within a relatively short 2,000-word report. Many students find it challenging to move beyond describing frameworks and instead critically evaluate why specific analytical tools are appropriate for their chosen company. The assignment also requires a detailed strategic position analysis focused on sustainability and decarbonisation, which means students must understand both traditional strategy models and contemporary environmental challenges facing the agricultural and food sector.

Another common difficulty is balancing internal and external analysis while keeping sustainability at the centre of the discussion. Students frequently spend too much time explaining models and not enough time applying them to the chosen organisation. Developing SMART recommendations that directly emerge from the SWOT analysis and support long-term decarbonisation goals can also be challenging. Since distinction-level work requires strong critical evaluation, extensive academic literature, and innovative strategic thinking, many students struggle to achieve the depth expected at postgraduate level.

Common Challenges Students Face

  • Choosing a suitable agricultural or food sector organisation

  • Critically evaluating strategic frameworks rather than describing them

  • Applying PESTEL, Porter`s Five Forces, VRIO, Value Chain, and SWOT effectively

  • Integrating sustainability and SDGs throughout the analysis

  • Linking internal and external findings logically

  • Developing realistic decarbonisation strategies

  • Producing SMART recommendations supported by evidence

  • Meeting postgraduate critical analysis standards within 2,000 words

Need Help With Strategic Decision Making Assignments?

Strategy assignments require far more than understanding business models. Students must demonstrate critical thinking, analyse complex environments, evaluate competing perspectives, and develop practical recommendations supported by evidence. Many students understand frameworks such as SWOT or PESTEL but struggle to apply them in a way that demonstrates genuine strategic insight and innovation.

At Assignment Experts, students receive support with strategic analysis, sustainability-focused business reports, SWOT development, framework application, and academic structuring. Whether you are analysing a global food producer, an agricultural organisation, or a sustainability-focused enterprise, expert guidance can help you create a professional report that aligns with postgraduate assessment criteria and demonstrates strong strategic thinking.