Andrew Jackson as a President

Assignment Brief

Was Andrew Jackson a president of the people, by the people and for the people or not? If so, why or why not? Give examples of things that he did to make you state why you claim to stand.

Sample Answer

Was Andrew Jackson a President of the People, by the People, and for the People?

Andrew Jackson, who served as the seventh President of the United States from 1829 to 1837, is often remembered as a strong and controversial leader who reshaped American politics. His presidency marked a shift toward greater democracy for many citizens, particularly white men, and he is sometimes described as a “man of the people.” To assess whether Jackson was truly a president “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” it is important to consider both his achievements and the groups he excluded or harmed.

Jackson as a President of the People

Jackson`s rise to power symbolised a change in American democracy. Before Jackson, political power was often dominated by wealthy, educated elites. Jackson himself came from humble beginnings and was celebrated as a self-made man and war hero. He appealed strongly to the “common man,” particularly white male settlers and workers, and promoted the idea that political participation should be expanded beyond the elite class.

One key example of Jackson’s democratic reforms was his support for expanding voting rights. During his era, many states removed property ownership requirements for white men to vote. This expansion of suffrage meant that more ordinary white men could participate in elections, which was a significant step toward a more inclusive democracy, though it still excluded women, Native Americans, and African Americans.

Jackson also challenged established financial interests that he believed favoured the wealthy elite at the expense of ordinary citizens. A notable example was his opposition to the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson viewed the bank as a corrupt institution controlled by wealthy elites and foreign investors. His veto of the bank’s recharter and the withdrawal of federal funds from the bank won him support from farmers and workers who felt ignored by the political system.

Moreover, Jackson’s use of the “spoils system”, rewarding loyal supporters with government jobs, was seen as a way to democratise government by opening it up to more ordinary citizens, though critics argue it also encouraged corruption and inefficiency.

Jackson’s Limitations and Controversies

Despite these democratic advances for many white men, Jackson’s presidency had serious limitations and deeply troubling policies. His treatment of Native Americans stands out as one of the darkest parts of his legacy. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 allowed the federal government to force Native American tribes off their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States, relocating them west of the Mississippi River. This policy led to the “Trail of Tears,” during which thousands of Native Americans died due to harsh conditions. Jackson’s policy reflected a clear prioritisation of white settlers’ interests over Indigenous rights and lives, contradicting the idea of a government “for the people” in any inclusive sense.

Furthermore, Jackson was a slave owner who defended the institution of slavery. His presidency did nothing to advance the rights or freedoms of African Americans; instead, it supported the continuation and expansion of slavery in the southern states. This exclusion of Black Americans from the benefits of democracy highlights another major failure of Jackson’s vision of the “people.”

Women were also excluded from political participation and rights during Jackson’s time. The idea of “government by the people” did not apply to half the population, and Jackson’s policies did not challenge this inequality.

Jackson’s Legacy: A Mixed Record

Andrew Jackson undoubtedly transformed American politics by broadening participation for many white men and challenging entrenched elites. His style of leadership and political reforms contributed to what is often called the “Jacksonian Democracy,” which celebrated the power and voice of the average white citizen. In this sense, he was truly a president “of the people” and “by the people”, but only a select portion of the people.

However, his exclusion and mistreatment of Native Americans, support of slavery, and failure to extend rights to women and minorities mean that he was not a president “for the people” in a just or universal way. Jackson’s presidency promoted democracy for some while oppressing others, which complicates the claim that he was a leader truly representing all Americans.

Continued...