Discuss the inherently rich means of describing and thinking about architecture seen in Gadamer`s notion of interplay

Assignment Brief

Critical Regionalism, Interplay and Formalism

Discuss the inherently rich means of describing and thinking about architecture seen in Gadamer`s notion of interplay and/or Frampton`s notion of critical regionalism, comparing them (or one of them) briefly to a formalist way of characterising the architecture

Sample Answer

Critical Regionalism, Interplay, and Formalism in Architectural Thought

Architecture, as a discipline, is marked by a continuous dialogue between theory and practice, shaped by cultural, historical, and aesthetic forces. Among the many theoretical lenses used to interpret architecture, Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical notion of “interplay” and Kenneth Frampton’s theory of “critical regionalism” offer particularly rich frameworks. Both approaches resist reductionist interpretations of architecture, advocating for a nuanced understanding of built forms as embedded within broader cultural and spatial contexts. In contrast, formalism, with its emphasis on the autonomous visual qualities of architecture, often abstracts form from place and meaning. This essay will explore how Gadamer’s interplay and Frampton’s critical regionalism enrich architectural discourse, comparing their approaches briefly to a formalist mode of analysis.

Gadamer’s Interplay and Architectural Interpretation

Hans-Georg Gadamer, in Truth and Method (1975), proposes the concept of “play” (Spiel) or “interplay” as a central mode of human experience, especially in the context of aesthetics and understanding. For Gadamer, the act of interpretation is not passive but dynamic, a dialogical process wherein the interpreter and the work of art engage in mutual transformation. Applied to architecture, this interplay suggests that buildings are not mere objects of static perception but invite experiential engagement, where meaning unfolds through time, use, and context.

Architecture, from a Gadamerian perspective, is not simply a technical or aesthetic product but a medium that mediates human understanding and cultural identity. Interplay involves the interaction of light, material, scale, and the observer’s movement, elements that cannot be captured through static analysis alone. Thus, Gadamer’s thought compels architects and critics to account for the lived experience of architecture: how buildings are perceived differently at various times of day, how they weather and age, and how users navigate, dwell in, and transform spaces.

In this sense, Gadamer’s “interplay” challenges the objectifying gaze of formalism. While formalist analysis might focus on the compositional purity or geometric logic of a structure, interplay focuses on relational aspects, between the building and its environment, between the viewer and the viewed, and between past meanings and contemporary use. Gadamer’s emphasis on historicity and tradition as elements in understanding further connects architectural interpretation to cultural memory, suggesting that buildings are part of a hermeneutic continuum, constantly interpreted anew.

Frampton’s Critical Regionalism: Context and Resistance

Similarly resisting the universalising tendencies of formalism, Kenneth Frampton’s “critical regionalism”, first articulated in his 1983 essay “Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance”, advocates for an architectural approach that mediates global modernism with local context. Frampton critiques the placelessness of modern architecture, especially as it has been shaped by international capitalism and technological homogenisation. For him, architecture must avoid the dual pitfalls of sentimental regionalism and abstract modernism, instead embracing a critical engagement with place, culture, and climate.

Critical regionalism, therefore, is not simply about using local materials or styles but about creating an architecture of resistance, one that resists commodification and standardisation by rooting design in the specificities of topography, light, climate, and local traditions. Frampton emphasises the tactility of materials, the modulation of light, and the tectonic expression of structure as key to grounding architecture in human experience.

Continued...