Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Reflective Evaluation of a Micro Training Event in Learning and Development

Assignment Brief

HR 5009 Assessment

Guide ASSESSMENT

There will be two-part assessments on this module

  1. Practical Assessment: up to 20 minutes maximum – 50% weighting.

  2. Written Assessment 1000 word individual reflection based on training event – 50% weighting.

Assessment 1: Details & Requirements

You are to Design, Deliver, and Evaluate a group training event based on organisational case study lasting 20 minutes. The group size could be between 4 and 6 students depending on group size. Acting in the capacity of trainers, you are asked to deliver a 20 minute learning event to the other students in the class. You should aim to teach them a new skill, or to develop an existing skill or give them new knowledge in a business or management related area. Each group will be given a Learning Event Preparation Form which asks for the names of group members, the title and the learning objectives of the session. Planning and designing a micro training session. You are to Design, Deliver, and Evaluate a group training event based on organisational case study lasting 20 minutes. The group size could be between 4 and 6 students depending on group size

Learning Outcomes:

Students will have developed their skills and understanding in:

  • planning and designing a micro training session

  • writing learning objectives

  • using a range of methods and techniques to ensure effective learning

  • constructing a simple evaluation tool to assess the learners’ experience of the event

  • working effectively in a team Training event requirements

Each group should:

  1. plan and design a session of a maximum of 20 minutes

  2. specify its training objectives for the event

  3. deliver a session which includes some element of group or individual participation (eg a structured discussion, an exercise, a case study etc)

  4. use audio visual aids as appropriate, including at least one handout

  5. devise a simple evaluation tool to obtain feedback from the learners about the session

Part B: Details & Requirements Reflective account (1000 words)

You are required to submit via Turnitin, in the usual manner, a reflective report of 1000 words based on the training event, detailing your skills development and lessons learnt. You should include the following key points in your reflective account

  • Discussion of key considerations when planning your training event and the professional behaviours required of trainer.

  • You should reflect on the key learning you have gained from contributing to a training event. How has this activity shaped your knowledge as a future Learning and development professional?

  • How has this activity shaped and improved your strategic understanding of developing a training intervention?

  • You should reference relevant academic material in your reflective statement e.g. learning needs and learning styles literature.

  • Your reflective statement should NOT just be a review of the challenges encountered in your team.

You should reflect on how you were able to manage your own time and co-ordinate and contribute to the training - what have you learnt about your core competencies from this activity. You are allowed to include appendices that will not count towards the word-count but you must make sure that these are either numerical or graphical in nature, and NOT textual. The deadline for the submission of the reflective essay is xxxxx 2020. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Structure You have been asked to produce an essay, which should contain the following:

  • Title

  • Contents Page

  • Introduction

  • Main body, which should also be organised under appropriate headings.

  • Conclusion

  • Word count; excluding contents page, appendices and reference list Presentation Your work should be word processed in accordance with the following:

  • Font style, Ariel or Calibri, font size 12

  • 1.5 line spacing.

  • The page orientation should be ‘portrait’

  • Margins on both sides of the page should be no less than 2.5 cm

  • Pages must be numbered

  • Your name must not appear on the script.

  • Your student number must be included on every page.

We strongly suggest that you try to submit all coursework by the deadline set as meeting deadlines will be expected in employment. However, in our regulations, UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. The deadline is published in this module guide. Coursework which is submitted late, but within 24 hours of the deadline, will be assessed but subjected to a fixed penalty of 5% of the total marks available (as opposed to marks obtained). If you submit twice, once before the deadline and once during the 24 hour late period, then the second submission will be marked and 5% deducted. This rule only applies to coursework. It does not apply to examinations, presentations, performances, practical assessments or viva voce examinations. If you miss these for a genuine reason, then you will need to apply for extenuating circumstances, or accept that you will receive a zero mark. Resubmission of assessment Those students who were not able – due to extenuating circumstances – to take the group assessment for this module and have applied and been granted permission to sit this assessment will be given an individual task. Also, those students who failed their group assessment and need to re-sit it on an individual basis will be given an individual assessment to submit.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Sample Answer

Reflective Evaluation of a Micro Training Event in Learning and Development

Introduction

This reflective report evaluates my contribution to the design, delivery, and evaluation of a 20-minute group training event completed as part of the HR5009 assessment. The training session was developed around an organisational case study and aimed to build participants’ understanding of a business-related skill through structured interaction and practical engagement. The purpose of this reflection is to critically analyse the planning process, professional behaviours required of a trainer, and the key learning outcomes achieved. Drawing on relevant academic literature, this report reflects on how the experience shaped my development as a future learning and development professional, strengthened my strategic understanding of training interventions, and enhanced my core competencies such as time management, collaboration, and communication.

Planning and Design of the Training Event

Effective planning was central to the success of the training event. One of the first considerations was defining clear and measurable learning objectives. According to Bloom’s taxonomy, learning objectives should specify what learners will know or be able to do by the end of the session (Bloom, 1956). Given the limited 20-minute timeframe, objectives needed to be realistic, focused, and aligned with both the case study and the needs of the learners.

The session design followed a structured approach, beginning with a brief introduction, followed by a participatory activity based on the case study, and concluding with a short recap. Adult learning theory strongly influenced this design. Knowles’ theory of andragogy emphasises that adult learners are self-directed and learn best when content is relevant to real-world situations (Knowles et al., 2015). By embedding the learning within an organisational case, the session encouraged engagement and practical application rather than passive listening.

The selection of learning methods was another key consideration. A short group discussion and scenario-based exercise were used to encourage interaction and knowledge sharing. This approach reflected Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, particularly the stages of concrete experience and reflective observation (Kolb, 1984). Visual slides and a simple handout supported different learning preferences and helped reinforce key concepts within the time constraints.

Professional Behaviour and Role of the Trainer

Acting in the role of a trainer required a high standard of professional behaviour. Preparation, clarity of communication, and confidence were essential to establishing credibility. As noted by Torrington et al. (2020), trainers must demonstrate professionalism through organisation, subject knowledge, and the ability to manage group dynamics effectively.

During delivery, it was important to maintain an inclusive learning environment. Encouraging quieter participants to contribute and managing dominant voices required emotional intelligence and adaptability. Time discipline was also critical, as exceeding allocated time would have reduced the effectiveness of the session and demonstrated poor planning. This experience reinforced the importance of professional conduct not only in content delivery but also in behaviour, tone, and responsiveness to learners’ needs.

Learning Gained as a Future L&D Professional

Participating in this training event significantly shaped my understanding of the learning and development role. One of the key lessons was the complexity involved in delivering even a short training session. The experience highlighted that effective training requires more than subject knowledge. It involves understanding learners, structuring content logically, and selecting appropriate delivery methods.

This activity strengthened my awareness of how learning theories translate into practice. Concepts such as active learning, learner engagement, and feedback became tangible rather than abstract. The process also enhanced my confidence in facilitating learning, particularly in managing discussions and responding to unexpected questions. These insights are directly relevant to a future career in learning and development, where adaptability and learner-centred design are essential.

Strategic Understanding of Training Interventions

The training event contributed to my strategic understanding of how training interventions support organisational objectives. Even at a micro level, the session required alignment between learning objectives, delivery methods, and evaluation. This mirrors the broader training cycle used in organisations, which includes needs analysis, design, delivery, and evaluation (Gold et al., 2013).

Developing a simple evaluation tool helped me understand the importance of measuring learner reactions and perceived value. While the evaluation was basic, it reflected Kirkpatrick’s first level of evaluation, focusing on participant feedback (Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick, 2006). This experience demonstrated that training should never be delivered in isolation but should form part of a structured and evaluative process that supports continuous improvement.

Self-Reflection on Time Management and Core Competencies

Time management was a significant personal learning point. Balancing preparation with other academic commitments required prioritisation and clear communication within the group. This experience highlighted my strengths in organisation and reliability, as well as areas for improvement, particularly in delegating tasks more effectively.

Working collaboratively enhanced my teamwork and interpersonal skills. Coordinating with group members required negotiation, compromise, and accountability. I also developed greater self-awareness regarding my communication style and ability to remain calm under time pressure. These competencies are essential for HR and L&D professionals, who often manage multiple stakeholders and tight deadlines.

Yes, it fully aligns with the learning outcomes, structure, and reflective requirements.

Yes, it integrates recognised learning and training theories with critical reflection.

Yes, the structure allows easy adaptation to your specific case study.

Yes, it uses clear UK academic English with a professional but natural tone.

Leah

Honestly saved me. The reflection sounded like something I would actually write, not robotic at all.

United Kingdom

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Olivia

The structure was spot on and my lecturer commented on how clear my reflection was.

United Kingdom

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Sarah

Assignment Experts really understand HR modules. This felt properly thought through.

United Kingdom

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
George

Best part was how natural it sounded while still being academic. Got a solid mark.

United Kingdom

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜