Sample Answer
The Merits and Challenges of Ancient Greek Democracy
Introduction
Ancient Greek democracy, particularly that of Athens in the fifth century BCE, is often considered the foundation of modern democratic systems. It was revolutionary for its time, giving ordinary citizens an active role in governance and promoting civic participation on a scale never before seen. However, while it introduced ideas that shaped later political thought, it also had serious flaws, including exclusion, inequality, and instability. This essay explores both the merits and challenges of ancient Greek democracy to understand its legacy and limitations.
Merits of Ancient Greek Democracy
One of the greatest merits of Athenian democracy was its emphasis on citizen participation. Every eligible male citizen had the right to attend the ekklesia (assembly), where they could speak, vote, and directly shape laws and policies. This direct involvement created a strong sense of civic duty and belonging, encouraging citizens to take responsibility for the welfare of their city-state.
Another merit was political equality, or what the Greeks called isonomia. Every citizen, regardless of wealth or social class, had the same right to participate in government decisions. Positions in public office were often filled by lot rather than election, reducing the influence of elites and ensuring fair representation among citizens.
Athens also demonstrated the value of public debate and education. Citizens were encouraged to engage in discussions, question leaders, and argue cases in court, which fostered a culture of critical thinking and public reasoning. Philosophers like Socrates and later Aristotle thrived in this environment, laying intellectual groundwork for Western political philosophy.
Challenges of Ancient Greek Democracy
Despite these achievements, Athenian democracy was far from perfect. Its most glaring issue was exclusion. Women, enslaved people, and foreigners (known as metics) were entirely excluded from political participation. In reality, only about 10–15% of Athens’ population could take part in democracy, meaning it was democratic only for a privileged minority.
Another major challenge was instability and susceptibility to manipulation. Because decisions were made directly by the assembly, emotional or persuasive speakers could sway public opinion quickly. Demagogues, charismatic leaders who appealed to people’s emotions rather than reason, often manipulated the crowd, leading to rash or destructive decisions. A famous example was the execution of six Athenian generals after the Battle of Arginusae (406 BCE), which was later viewed as a serious miscarriage of justice driven by mob anger.
Moreover, Athenian democracy faced difficulty balancing efficiency and inclusivity. While broad participation was valued, involving thousands of citizens in decision-making made governance slow and inconsistent. Constant public debates and frequent voting often hindered the development of stable, long-term policies.
Finally, democracy in Athens was built on economic inequality. Although political equality existed among citizens, the system relied heavily on enslaved labour and tribute from allied city-states to sustain itself. This contradiction between democratic ideals and exploitative realities ultimately weakened Athens and contributed to its downfall after the Peloponnesian War.
