Compare some of the linguistic theories presented in this chapter with points raised in the Chapter Six
Assignment Brief
Compare some of the linguistic theories presented in this chapter with points raised in the Chapter Six: "Language Perspectives"
Taking a position, make a claim about whether understanding of language development in the brain aids our understanding of "coming into language" as humans communicating with each other? Does it? Or does it not?
Write an essay taking a position on the connection between our scientific understanding of what happens in our brains and our social understanding of how we might communicate with each other. Integrate your ideas with those of your sources, citing correctly.
Research how the Internet is influencing how we think and how it may or may not be changing our brains. This a POSITION argument
Will the Internet be the next significant influence on our physical evolution? Does this affect our genetic heritage? How might our brains change? Or will it NOT?
Write an essay taking a position on this topic, with supporting evidence and acknowledgement of the counterargument using the language of concession and refutation. Integrate your ideas with those of your sources, citing correctly.
"Do the languages we speak shape the way we think?" Lera Boroditsky wonders (p.469). What do you think?
Write an essay responding to her question, taking a position, with supporting evidence and acknowledgement of the counterargument using the language of concession and refutation. Integrate your ideas with those of your sources, citing correctly.
Here is Boroditsky`s TED talk: How Language Shapes the Way We Think (if you use this as a source, research how to cite media correctly).
You should write between 8 - 10 pages for this essay
Sample Answer
Language, Thought, and Technology: How Brain Science and the Internet Are Reshaping Human Communication
Introduction
Language is not merely a tool for communication, it is central to human identity, cognition, and culture. The intersection of linguistic theory, neuroscience, and technological advancement has created fertile ground for rethinking how humans acquire and use language. This essay argues that understanding language development in the brain significantly deepens our understanding of how humans "come into language" as social communicators. Furthermore, it contends that the Internet is rapidly becoming a transformative force not only in communication patterns but potentially in cognitive evolution. Drawing upon linguistic theories, neuroscience, and research into digital media`s impact on cognition, this paper supports its position while acknowledging opposing views.
Understanding Language Development in the Brain
Contemporary linguistic theories, such as Noam Chomsky’s Universal Grammar, posit that humans are biologically predisposed to acquire language. Chomsky (1965) proposed that all humans share a common set of grammatical principles encoded in the brain, which explains the rapid acquisition of complex language skills in early childhood. Neuroscience supports this claim. Functional MRI studies have revealed specific brain regions, such as Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas, that are activated during language production and comprehension (Friederici, 2011). These findings suggest a neurobiological basis for language development.
Understanding these brain mechanisms provides insight into the phenomenon of "coming into language." As infants interact with caregivers, neural pathways are reinforced, allowing linguistic competence to emerge. Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory complements this view by emphasizing the role of social interaction in language development. In this way, neurological preparedness and social engagement work in tandem. Therefore, studying the brain not only helps explain individual language acquisition but also enhances our understanding of how humans become communicators within a social world.
Concession and Refutation
Some argue that focusing too heavily on neurological processes risks neglecting the sociocultural richness of language. For instance, critics of cognitive linguistics suggest that brain imaging cannot capture the nuance of metaphor, idiom, or cultural context (Tomasello, 2003). While this is a valid concern, recent interdisciplinary approaches have increasingly bridged this gap. Cognitive neuroscientists now study pragmatic competence and the neural basis of metaphor comprehension, showing that even culturally nuanced aspects of language engage distinct brain regions (Bohrn et al., 2012). Thus, neuroscience does not replace social theory but enriches it.
Language, Thought, and the Role of the Internet
As the digital age advances, the Internet has emerged as a powerful force in shaping language use, cognition, and even social identity. Lera Boroditsky (2010) suggests that the languages we speak influence how we think, an idea supported by studies showing that grammatical structures affect perception of time, space, and agency. If language influences thought, and the Internet reshapes language, it follows that the Internet might also influence how we think.
For example, Carr (2010) argues that digital media may be reducing our capacity for deep reading and reflective thought, as we increasingly process information in fragmented, hyperlink-driven formats. Neuroscientific studies lend some support: brain scans reveal changes in attention and memory processes among frequent digital media users (Small & Vorgan, 2009). These findings raise the question of whether constant digital exposure is rewiring our brains and, by extension, affecting cognitive evolution.
Continued...
