Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

European Union Law

Assignment Brief

Module Code:  LA6030

Module Title:  European Union Law

This piece of coursework will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:

  1. Demonstrates clear, precise, detailed and up-to-date knowledge of the field. 
  2. Recognizes and assesses the relevant critical issues.  
  3. Formulates relevant and supported arguments/criticism.
  4. It is focused, well-structured, well-supported and clear.
  5. Demonstrates an ability to research and use relevant primary and secondary sources.

This coursework assessment is designed to allow students to show how the following learning outcomes have been achieved:

Knowledge: An ability to discuss the EU institutions in their political and social context.

Thinking skills: An ability to analyse the inter-institutional balance, relate it to the sui generis nature of the EU and formulate criticism.

Subject-based practical skills: An ability to retrieve relevant Treaty amendments, and to research and use relevant primary and secondary sources.

Skills for life and work (general skills): Enhance communication and presentation skills.

ASSESSMENT

Instructions to Students:

PLEASE NOTE:  Assessments MUST be properly referenced and MUST include a bibliography.  Adequacy of referencing will form part of the marking criteria.

Answer the following question

‘The Member States’ shared concern with the democratic character of the European Union manifested itself in successive rounds of Treaty reform which over time increased the formal powers of the European Parliament quite dramatically.’

Critically discuss.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Sample Answer

Democratic Character of the EU and the Expansion of the European Parliament’s Powers

Introduction

The European Union (EU) has long been criticised for its so-called “democratic deficit,” a term describing the perceived gap between its decision-making institutions and the citizens they serve. In response to this, successive Treaty reforms have expanded the role of the European Parliament (EP). This essay critically examines the statement that the Member States’ concern with democracy has gradually resulted in the strengthening of the EP. It will consider the historical background, the nature of Treaty reforms, the current institutional balance, and ongoing challenges to democratic legitimacy within the EU.

Historical Background and Democratic Concerns

When the European Communities were first established, decision-making power largely rested with intergovernmental bodies such as the Council, with only a limited consultative role for the EP (then the European Assembly). This institutional design reflected Member States’ reluctance to cede sovereignty, but it also fuelled criticisms about democratic legitimacy. Citizens could directly elect national parliaments, yet the body representing them at EU level had no legislative power. The direct elections to the EP in 1979 were a first attempt to address this concern, but the Parliament remained weak compared to the Council and the Commission.

Treaty Reforms and the Expansion of Parliamentary Powers

A series of Treaty reforms gradually strengthened the EP:

  • Single European Act (1986): Introduced the cooperation procedure, giving the EP more influence in certain legislative areas.

  • Maastricht Treaty (1992): Created the co-decision procedure, granting the EP a legislative role equal to the Council in specific policy fields.

  • Amsterdam Treaty (1997): Extended co-decision to more areas, making the EP an equal legislator in the majority of EU law.

  • Nice Treaty (2001): Adjusted the institutional balance but did not greatly expand EP powers.

  • Lisbon Treaty (2009): Marked the most significant reform, renaming co-decision as the ordinary legislative procedure and making it the default law-making process. The EP also gained full budgetary powers and a stronger role in the appointment of the Commission President.

These reforms demonstrate how the democratic legitimacy of the EU became an increasing concern for Member States, leading to a more central legislative role for the EP.

Analyse Treaty reforms, evaluate inter-institutional balance, and consider democratic accountability. Use both legal texts and academic commentary to support your critique.

Yes. Maastricht, Amsterdam, and Nice are key. Early treaties like Rome are useful for context on Parliament’s limited powers initially.

Both. Legislative powers, budgetary authority, and elections are interconnected in assessing democratic legitimacy.

Explain the hybrid supranational/intergovernmental structure and show how it influences Parliament’s evolving powers.

Sophie Turner

Analysing EU Treaties in detail helped me understand how parliamentary powers evolved. The inter-institutional balance section really made me think crit...

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Isabella Hughes

The essay brief was challenging but interesting. I enjoyed connecting democratic theory with Treaty reforms and EU institutional practice.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Hannah Green

Researching primary and secondary sources for this assignment improved my ability to support arguments with evidence and references.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Harvey Jones

Breaking down each Treaty and its impact on the European Parliament made the essay structured and easy to follow, even with the complex EU framework.

United Kingdom

★★★★☆