Critically analyse financial theories, concepts and economic models of regulation and compliance in a range of economic contexts

Assignment Brief

On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:

Knowledge and Understanding

1. Critically analyse financial theories, concepts and economic models of regulation and compliance in a range of economic contexts
2. Analyse and critically evaluate the ways in which regulations are adapted in view of specific market culture and consumer behaviour
3. Critically evaluate the role of regulations and compliance in the strategic prevention of systemic risk and contagion and the enhancement of social responsibility and economic sustainability
4. Analyse and critically evaluate the role of central bank and government regulations and compliance requirements in asset risk management and liquidity from international perspectives

Transferable/Key Skills and other Attributes

1. Identify the strategic and operational impact of financial regulations, compliance and risk management
2. Work on their own and with others in analysing and presenting solutions to compliance and risk modelling in the solving of organisational problems and issues in the financial sector
3. Manage their time to meet deadlines in both group discussions and in preparation of in-class activities
4. Develop and enhance research skills and analytical capability for use in an organisational context 

TASK

1. 1 Choosing a specific European bank, and produce a final report covering the following issues: Discuss different types of risks this bank manages. Gather evidence and discuss whether these risks have been sufficiently managed since 2005.
2. 2 Discuss the regulatory relationship and how this has influenced this bank’s risk management.
3. 3 With reference to both micro and macro prudential policy and regulation, critically analyse the impact of the Basel III Guidelines on this bank’s risk management.

Sample Answer

Risk, Regulation, and Compliance: A Case Study of Deutsche Bank

Introduction

Financial institutions are exposed to multiple types of risks, which can affect not only the bank itself but the wider economy. In the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, stricter regulations, especially under Basel III, have reshaped how banks manage risk and ensure financial stability. This report examines Deutsche Bank, a leading European bank, by discussing the types of risks it faces, evaluating how these risks have been managed since 2005, analysing its relationship with regulatory bodies, and exploring the impact of Basel III guidelines on its risk management practices.

Types of Risks Managed by Deutsche Bank and Their Management Since 2005

a. Credit Risk

Credit risk refers to the possibility of loss from a borrower`s failure to repay a loan. Deutsche Bank manages this through diversification of its loan portfolio, credit scoring systems, and provisioning for bad debts. Since 2005, especially after the 2008 crisis, the bank has tightened its credit standards, increased transparency, and restructured its investment banking division, which had significant exposure to risky assets like mortgage-backed securities.

b. Market Risk

Market risk involves losses due to changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, and stock prices. Deutsche Bank has used Value at Risk (VaR) models, stress testing, and hedging strategies to manage market risk. However, it has faced criticism, particularly during the eurozone debt crisis, when it incurred large trading losses. Since then, the bank has scaled down risky proprietary trading activities.

c. Operational Risk

Operational risk arises from internal failures, including fraud, system breakdowns, and legal issues. Deutsche Bank has faced significant legal and compliance costs, including fines for money laundering, LIBOR manipulation, and tax evasion. Since 2015, it has invested heavily in compliance systems, improved internal controls, and simplified its organisational structure to reduce these risks.

d. Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk of being unable to meet short-term financial obligations. In 2008, Deutsche Bank faced pressure due to market illiquidity. Post-crisis, the bank improved its liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and maintained a liquidity reserve in line with Basel III standards.

e. Reputation Risk

Due to scandals and poor financial performance, Deutsche Bank’s reputation has suffered. To manage this, the bank has emphasised corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical conduct, aligning with stakeholder expectations and sustainability goals.

Evaluation of Risk Management Since 2005

Deutsche Bank’s risk management has significantly improved since 2005, particularly after 2008. However, its progress has been inconsistent. Regulatory fines, poor governance, and strategic missteps have weakened investor confidence. In recent years, reforms and new leadership have led to better capitalisation, stronger compliance, and a focus on core banking services, showing a positive trend in risk management.

Regulatory Relationship and Its Influence on Deutsche Bank’s Risk Management

Deutsche Bank is regulated by both national and international bodies, including:

• BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany)

• European Central Bank (ECB) under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM)

• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)

• US Federal Reserve (due to significant operations in the US)

Impact of Regulation

The regulatory relationship has been a key driver in reshaping Deutsche Bank’s risk management. Following regulatory actions, the bank has:

• Reduced leverage by scaling down risky assets.

• Improved compliance infrastructure, hiring thousands of compliance staff.

• Restructured business lines to align with regulatory capital requirements.

• Introduced internal risk culture training to foster accountability.

In response to strict supervision by the ECB and penalties from US regulators, Deutsche Bank has made risk management a strategic priority, with board-level oversight. Its risk appetite framework is now more conservative, and it publishes regular risk disclosures to maintain transparency.

Continued...