Select a policy in health care that was implemented as a result of regulatory or legislative requirement.

Assignment  Brief

Healthcare Policy Paper Rubric 

• Factors/Rational that led to development of policy (contextual dimension) 
• Benefits to healthcare
• Cost(s) related to the policy (fiscal, time factors, manpower) 
• Impact on client (stakeholder) satisfaction 
• Impact on clinical outcomes 

Policy attached as Appendix

Sample Answer

Healthcare Policy Paper: Smoking Ban in Public Places (Health Act 2006)

Factors/Rationale That Led to Development of Policy (Contextual Dimension)

Before 2006, smoking in enclosed public spaces such as pubs, restaurants, offices, and hospitals was common in the UK. This exposed non-smokers, including workers and vulnerable groups, to second-hand smoke, which has been proven to cause serious health problems such as lung cancer, heart disease, and asthma.

Health experts, including the Royal College of Physicians and the British Medical Association, raised awareness about the dangers of passive smoking. Public pressure and growing evidence from other countries, such as Ireland (which introduced a ban in 2004), also pushed the UK government to act.

As a result, The Health Act 2006 introduced legislation to ban smoking in all enclosed public spaces and workplaces across England from July 1, 2007. This was part of a wider effort to protect public health and reduce the burden on the NHS caused by smoking-related illnesses.

Benefits to Healthcare

The smoking ban brought several important health benefits:

• Reduced exposure to second-hand smoke, especially among workers in pubs, restaurants, and healthcare facilities.

• Lower hospital admissions for heart attacks and respiratory conditions. Studies showed a significant decline in such admissions in the years following the ban.

• Improved indoor air quality, leading to safer and healthier work environments.

• Encouraged many people to quit smoking, which reduced smoking rates over time and contributed to a healthier population.

• Reduced long-term pressure on the NHS due to fewer smoking-related illnesses.

Cost(s) Related to the Policy (Fiscal, Time Factors, Manpower)

Implementing the policy came with some costs:

• Financial costs to businesses for putting up signage, training staff, and adapting outdoor smoking areas.

• Local authorities had to hire and train enforcement officers to carry out inspections and handle complaints, which required additional manpower and resources.

• Time spent by councils and healthcare organisations on public education campaigns to inform people about the ban.

• Some pubs and clubs claimed that they saw a drop in customer numbers, especially in the early months, though this effect was temporary.

Despite these costs, the long-term savings to the NHS from fewer smoking-related diseases are believed to outweigh the initial investments.

Impact on Client (Stakeholder) Satisfaction

Stakeholders included the general public, business owners, healthcare workers, and government bodies.

• Public satisfaction was high overall, especially among non-smokers, families, and workers who no longer had to breathe in smoke.

• Some business owners, especially in the hospitality sector, were initially unhappy due to fears of losing customers. However, many later adapted and accepted the benefits.

• Healthcare professionals welcomed the policy, as it supported public health and safety.

• Smokers were the group least satisfied, but many used the change as a reason to try quitting, especially with NHS support services.

Continued...