Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Reflect upon three learning experiences which have helped you examine your own perspectives and values regarding the discrimination towards, and stereotyping of, a particular community

Assignment Brief

Coursework Two: Portfolio (3,000 words equivalent)

Part One: Reflective Journal

Content, guidance and suggested word count

Section A:  Reflect upon three learning experiences which have helped you examine your own perspectives and values regarding the discrimination towards, and stereotyping of, a particular community

Suggested word count of around 1,000

Students are recommended to:

  • Give each learning experience its own sub heading

  • Describe the principle encapsulated within / essence of each experience

  • Resist describing the experiences in too much detail, and thereby save word count for critical analysis / the application of theory

  • Cite the theory that the experience most relates to or illustrates

  • Not be afraid to highlight their own shortfalls or prejudices (For example to what extent their values and perspectives aligned, internalised and colluded with dominant ideologies and sterotyping? Why they might have behaved this way and what might have been the impact of these behaviours? 

  • Indicate how the learning could inform their future behaviour or enhance their practice

  • Refer to literature as well as reflecting on personal experience, and observations

  • Finish with a short, well written paragraph that summarises their position (i.e. their conclusion)

 

 

 

 

 Section B:  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of three anti-discriminatory strategies that might support the oppressed community you have chosen

Suggested word count of around 1,000

Students are recommended to:

  • Give each anti-discriminatory strategy its own sub heading

  • Describe the principle process / essence of each one

  • Cite the source (for example, the strategy’s author and date of origin)

    • Resist describing the strategy in too much detail, and thereby save word count for critical analysis

    • Identify some strong points that would suggest its effectiveness

    • Identify some of the strategy’s weaknesses and limitations

    • Give some ‘real life’ examples of how the strategy has or has not worked

    • Indicate why the strategy might be especially applicable to supporting the chosen community

    • Refer to literature as well as reflecting on personal experience, or observations

    • Finish with a short, well written paragraph that summarises their position (i.e. their conclusion)

Reference list

Should include all items referred to in the assignment

  • Wide ranging (including the core text and recommended reading)

  • Does not over rely on websites

  • Follows academic conventions (Cite them Right)

 

Part Two: Educational Resource

Students are required to:

Create an educational resource that elegantly illustrates and challenges the discrimination your chosen community has faced.

In other words:

  1. Make sure your examples concentrate mainly on incidents from the recent past.

  2. Make connections between your different examples and apply academic explanations and definitions.

  3. Make references to text books and articles from the reading list. Prioritise these academic sources more than citing newspapers, news channels, song lyrics, television stations and internet sources and provide the author’s name and the date of publication.

  4. Make it obvious that there is always ‘more than one side to any story’ by using language such as: On the one hand, Godfrey (2017) argues….., whereas on the other hand, Baugh (2017) suggests …. Try also to demonstrate your own independent thinking by paraphrasing rather than using too many direct quotes. Try and develop your own position rather than just mirror other people’s analysis.

Writing at Higher Education level is not a cut and paste exercise, but rather a demonstration of understanding and insight.

WORD COUNTS

  • A margin of +/- 10% is normally allowed  in word counts

  • For example, your 3,000 word Case Study and Reflective Journal can each be under or over by up to 200 words. In both cases, this equates to a minimum of 2,800 words and a maximum of 3,200 words.

Assessment criteria for each task

Area of learning

At level 4, students are expected to:

Acquiring knowledge, understanding and specialist vocabulary and principles

demonstrate a general knowledge and understanding of the subject under consideration together with a range of principles, concepts, ideas and terminology (vocabulary) associated with this area;


Applying knowledge and understanding

apply knowledge and understanding to interpret, describe and analyse problems and issues in limited and defined contexts;

In doing this

show some awareness of different approaches to problems and issues;

 

Communication of ideas and argument; academic writing

begin to communicate accurately and reliably, using arguments that are coherent and well structured with some sense of audience and purpose; answer a given question paying attention to specific requirements in terms of word length, nature of the work, appendices, etc.

 

Linking theory with practice; the skills of searching, referencing, making links.

begin to use skills to find and select information for a specific purpose; make reference to what they read and learn as they produce written or other responses; know how to set up a bibliography, using the conventions that apply at UEL;

 

Reflecting on own learning and progress and acting on this

 

Begin to show an awareness of own strengths and weaknesses and exploit opportunities for their own development.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Sample Answer

Discrimination towards the Homeless Community

Section A: Reflecting on Learning Experiences and Personal Perspectives

Homelessness is often misunderstood and heavily stereotyped in society. Many assumptions are shaped by media narratives, social attitudes, and limited personal exposure. Through my learning, I have been challenged to reconsider some of these views and reflect on how my own perceptions may have been influenced by wider social ideologies.

Learning Experience One: Media Representation of Homelessness

One of the most influential learning experiences came from analysing how homelessness is portrayed in the media. I noticed that homeless individuals are often shown in street-based contexts, frequently associated with addiction, unemployment, or antisocial behaviour.

This connects strongly with stigma theory (Goffman, 1963), which explains how individuals are socially discredited based on visible traits or labels. Media framing often reinforces this stigma by focusing on extreme or negative cases rather than structural causes such as housing shortages or mental health issues.

Reflecting honestly, I realised that I had previously internalised some of these stereotypes without questioning them. I assumed homelessness was primarily linked to personal failure rather than systemic inequality. This shows how dominant ideologies can shape perception without conscious awareness.

This learning experience helped me understand the importance of critical media consumption and how easily stereotypes can become normalised. In future practice, I will be more cautious about forming judgments based on media portrayals alone and will actively seek broader context.

Learning Experience Two: Volunteering Observation and Direct Interaction

Another key learning experience came from observing support work in a local homelessness charity setting. Seeing individuals engaging with support services challenged my previous assumptions significantly.

This experience aligns with contact theory (Allport, 1954), which suggests that direct interaction between groups can reduce prejudice when conducted under appropriate conditions. Speaking informally with service users helped humanise experiences of homelessness and highlighted the diversity within the group.

I also recognised my own unconscious biases at the beginning. I initially felt discomfort and made assumptions about behaviour and lifestyle. However, these perceptions changed as I listened to personal stories involving job loss, family breakdown, and mental health struggles.

The impact of this learning was significant. It showed me how structural factors rather than individual choices often play a major role in homelessness. It also highlighted how easily people can dehumanise others when they lack direct contact.

Moving forward, I would approach similar situations with greater openness and awareness of my own bias, ensuring more respectful and informed engagement.

Learning Experience Three: Academic Study of Structural Inequality

A further important learning experience came from studying structural explanations of homelessness in sociology and social policy modules. The work of Marxist theorists helped me understand how inequality in housing markets, employment, and welfare systems contributes to homelessness.

This contrasts sharply with individualistic explanations that blame personal behaviour. Learning about structural inequality theory helped me understand homelessness as a systemic issue rather than an isolated personal problem.

Reflecting on this, I recognised that I had previously leaned towards individual explanations without considering wider economic and political influences. This reflects what Schein (2010) describes as “taken-for-granted assumptions” within cultural thinking.

This learning challenged my values and helped me develop a more critical and balanced perspective. It also made me realise the importance of policy-level change in addressing homelessness, rather than focusing only on individual intervention.

Summary of Reflective Position

Overall, these learning experiences have significantly changed my understanding of homelessness. I now recognise the strong influence of structural inequality, media stereotyping, and limited social contact in shaping negative perceptions. I also acknowledge that I previously held simplified and partly biased views influenced by dominant social narratives. Moving forward, I aim to adopt a more critical, empathetic, and informed approach when engaging with issues of homelessness in both academic and professional contexts.

Because society tends to label homeless people based on visible circumstances, which leads to unfair assumptions about behaviour or character.

It is usually a combination of structural factors like housing shortages, poverty, and unemployment rather than a single personal reason.

It means actively challenging discrimination and power imbalance in services to treat people fairly and equally.

Direct interaction between groups helps break down assumptions and builds understanding between people.

Mark

This was honestly really well written. Felt natural and helped me understand how to structure reflective work properly.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
James

Got me a strong pass. The theory was explained in a way that actually made sense instead of just being textbook heavy.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Steve

Really liked how it didn’t sound robotic. My tutor said my reflection felt “authentic”, which helped a lot.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Hazel

Saved me loads of time. The homelessness part was explained really clearly and I could actually relate it to lectures.

United Kingdom

★★★★★