Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Strategic Analysis Report

Assignment Brief

Assessment: Strategic Analysis Report.

The module is assessed (100%) by an individual Strategic Report (maximum 3,000 words) involving an in-depth, strategic analysis of a large organisation. The subject of the report will be decided by the module convenor but students will be able to choose from a list of 6 varied examples. The task is briefed in Week 2 of the module and is due for submission in Week 12 by 2.00 pm on Monday 23th April 2018.

Instructions for assessment

The Strategic Report should strictly NOT exceed 3,000 words and demonstrate clear report style with relevant Harvard references.  It is to be a unified whole that answers three questions (see below) focused on the selected organisation. Formative work in weekly seminars will guide students through analytical techniques and processes required to complete the task.

For the selected organisation, assume you are an outside consultancy reporting to the Chief Executive.  The Strategic Report should:-

  1. Identify 3 key strategic issues facing the organisation with a clear explanation of why they are “strategic” (20%).

  2. Analyse fully the resources and key capabilities of the organisation plus key factors that give the company its competitive advantage. (40%)

  3. Assess the extent to which the organisation’s competitive strategy addresses its strategic issues, and suggest improvements where they might be justified. (30%)

A further 10% is available for clarity, structure, grammar, correct Harvard referencing and overall professional presentation showing clear report style.      

Best answers will draw explicitly on strategic concepts and analysis from the module and apply them to the organisation.  Clear referencing (Harvard system), professional presentation with appropriate diagrams/tables are required.

Again note the report should not exceed 3,000 words.  Appendices are allowed outside this limit but NO MORE than 6 pages.

How will we support you with your assessment?

There will be weekly references to the assessment task in seminars and weekly activities in those seminars will be helpful in creating “scaffolding” for eventual submission.  An assessment worksheet will be provided in Wk4 to assist the development of ideas.

The formative mini-casework in seminars will be of direct help in the application of relevant strategic tools. There will be regular Q&A sessions linked to the assessment report and in the final weeks of teaching there will be an opportunity to review and reflect upon work from previous cohorts.

How will your work be assessed?

Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking scheme indicated below.  Feedback will be given in the Turnitin/Grademark system with script comments plus overall points. When you access your marked work it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.

In this Strategic Report, high marks come from using strategic concepts and analysis from the module clearly applied to the organisation.  Harvard referencing, a professional report style plus appropriate diagrams/tables are also required. Outline marking expectations are as follows:-   

Q1: (20%) After a short introduction, we expect 3 key Strategic Issues with explanations and knowledge of why they are “strategic”. The 3 environments (PESTLE, 5 Forces & internal) should be used as a guide.

Q2: (40%) We expect strong course knowledge, clear industry CSFs plus the organisation’s resources & unique capabilities well analysed.  Also how unique capabilities link to advantage & CSFs, and their Porter generic strategy.

Q3: (30%) We expect an evaluation of how their strategy addresses their issues using the three SAFe tests – plus how it might be improved. A short overall conclusion completes the report. 

PRESENTATION: (10%) We expect a professional report with clear report style (not an essay) e.g. frontsheet, contents, clear sections, tables & diagrams and relevant Harvard referencing. The word count should not be exceeded by more than 10%.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Sample Answer

Strategic Analysis Report: Tesla, Inc.

Contents

  1. Executive Summary

  2. Introduction

  3. Key Strategic Issues (Q1)

  4. Resources, Capabilities and Competitive Advantage (Q2)

  5. Assessment of Competitive Strategy (Q3)

  6. Conclusion

  7. References

  8. Appendices

Executive Summary

This report provides an in-depth strategic analysis of Tesla, Inc., a global leader in electric vehicles (EVs) and clean energy solutions. It identifies three key strategic issues confronting Tesla, evaluates its resources and unique capabilities, and assesses how its competitive strategy addresses these challenges. Strategic frameworks such as PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces, the Resource-Based View (RBV), and the SAFe criteria are applied. Recommendations are provided for sustaining Tesla’s competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving automotive and energy sector.

Introduction

Tesla operates in the highly dynamic automotive and clean energy markets. As a technology-driven company, it faces rapid innovation cycles, global competition, and regulatory pressures. The purpose of this report is to examine Tesla’s strategic issues, evaluate its resources and capabilities, and assess the effectiveness of its competitive strategy.

Key Strategic Issues

Issue 1: Intensifying Global Competition in EV Market

  • Why strategic: The EV market is expanding rapidly, with legacy automakers (Volkswagen, Ford, Toyota) investing heavily in electrification. Competition threatens Tesla’s market share and long-term profitability.

  • Framework link: Porter’s Five Forces → Competitive rivalry is intensifying due to low differentiation and high investment from rivals.

Issue 2: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

  • Why strategic: Tesla relies heavily on rare earth minerals (lithium, cobalt, nickel). Global shortages or political risks threaten production scalability.

  • Framework link: PESTLE → Economic and geopolitical factors (e.g., reliance on China for lithium processing).

Issue 3: Regulatory and ESG Pressures

  • Why strategic: Government incentives for EV adoption can shift, and Tesla faces scrutiny over labour practices, environmental claims, and vehicle safety.

  • Framework link: PESTLE → Legal and social pressures; Internal environment → Reputation risk affecting investor and consumer trust.

Resources, Capabilities and Competitive Advantage

Tangible Resources

  • Financial strength: Consistently profitable since 2020, strong market valuation.

  • Physical assets: Gigafactories in the US, Germany, and China.

Intangible Resources

  • Brand reputation: Innovation, sustainability, and premium EV brand.

  • Technology & patents: Advanced battery technology, self-driving AI.

Key Capabilities

  • Innovation culture: Rapid product development cycles.

  • Vertical integration: Control over design, software, and manufacturing (unlike many competitors).

  • Global scaling ability: Expanding production through Gigafactories.

VRIO Analysis

  • Valuable: Patents, AI tech, vertical integration.

  • Rare: Proprietary charging network (Supercharger).

  • Inimitable: Strong brand loyalty, first-mover advantage.

  • Organised: Structure supports innovation, though sometimes criticised for over-reliance on Elon Musk.

Competitive Advantage

Tesla’s competitive advantage derives from its differentiation strategy (Porter’s generic strategies) through innovation, brand prestige, and technology leadership.

The report provides an in-depth evaluation of a selected organisation, identifying key strategic issues, analysing resources and capabilities, and assessing the effectiveness of competitive strategies.

The report should use PESTLE analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, internal analysis (resources and capabilities), and Porter’s Generic Strategies. SAFe tests are also required to evaluate strategy effectiveness.

Include a front page, contents page, introduction, sections addressing the three main questions, a conclusion, and appendices if needed. Use tables, diagrams, and clear headings to enhance clarity.

Harvard-style referencing and professional presentation are crucial. This includes clear report formatting, accurate citations, tables/diagrams, grammar, and logical flow.

Olivia

Assignments Experts helped me structure my strategic report professionally and clearly link theories to the company’s real-world issues.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Ethan

Thanks to Assignments Experts, I could apply PESTLE, Porter’s Five Forces, and internal analysis effectively to the organisation.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Lucy

Assignments Experts provided guidance on competitive strategies and SAFe tests, making my report very analytical and thorough.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Daniel

With Assignments Experts, I submitted a concise, well-referenced, and professional report that met all module requirements.

United Kingdom

★★★★★