Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Critically evaluate personal competencies and skills and prepare Action Plans for enhancement.

Module Guide

Module Title: Surgical First Assistant

Academic Level: 6

Credits 20

Module Leader:

Module Tutor:

Module Aim

To be competent in the role of the Surgical First Assistant.

Module Outcomes

At the end of the module you should be able to:

Personal and Transferable Skills

  1. Critically evaluate personal competencies and skills and prepare Action Plans for enhancement.

  2. Maintain confidential information and accurate documentation.

  3. Demonstrate the ability to work effectively in teams engaging in clinical discussions, presenting arguments in a logical and professional manner. Facilitate a culture of communication and team working.

  4. Reflect systematically and critically evaluate own performance.

Research, Knowledge and Cognitive Skills

  1. Demonstrate a critical understanding and application of evidence-based practice to surgical interventions.

  2. Demonstrate a critical and comprehensive understanding of the key concepts that support the provision of patient safe care whilst performing the SFA role.

  3. Demonstrate competency in the use and application of a wide range of surgical instrumentation techniques within the role of a Surgical First Assistant.

Professional Skills

  1. Systematically and critically evaluate the ethical and legal implications underpinning practice.

  2. Evaluate performance in the application of specialist knowledge and skills required to undertake the role of the Surgical First Assistant.

  3. Demonstrate intellectual flexibility, critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills.

  4. Critically analyse and evaluate current policy and pertinent evidence related to the role of the Surgical First Assistant.

Module Content and Timetable

The module time table will be given to you by the module leader on day one of the course.  This may also be found on BMiLearn.

Learning and Teaching Strategies

A range of learning and teaching strategies will be utilised throughout the module.  Key lectures will be delivered by practitioners with expert knowledge of the topic. This will be further discussed within seminar groups and students will discuss the topics and how the theory applies to the work place. Students will be encouraged to participate in a range of learning experiences including lectures, seminars and work based learning facilitated by their Practice Mentor and Clinical Supervisor.  Distance learning will enable the student to set their own pace of study, providing a flexible learning environment. 

Individual tutorials will be available to help learners with the theoretical and practice component and their academic writing.  In addition regular feedback on performance and completion of practice-based competencies will be determined by the learnersMentorand Supervisor.

Academic Support and Guidance

You will receive ongoing support throughout the module; this will be online through BMI learn. There will be an opportunity to discuss your summative assignment with the module tutor and 10% of your work can be read by the module leader and feedback provided. This can be done up to two weeks before submission.

Assessment Strategy

This module is assessed using summative assessment. The summative assessment consists of two components:

Component 1 Competency workbook (Pass/Fail): 

Completion of the competency workbook.  To be completed by the learner, the clinical supervisor and mentor.  To include the completion of a log book, to demonstrate 100 hours of assisting, as a trainee surgical first assistant.

Component 2 Reflective Case study (100%):

A 3000 word reflective case study, using an identified model of reflection, based on a patient care scenario/case study, the student has participated in during the module, exploring the role of the SFA and how this is supported by evidence based practice.

The students will have to gain patient consent in line with Teesside University Consent Regulations and failure to provide a consent form will result in automatic failure.

To ensure comprehensive competency development in terms of applying theory to practice, both assessments must be passed.

Summative assessment deadline

Will take place on week 48 of the module

First attempt Assessment deadline

21st July 2021

Results published subject to exam board ratification

18th August 2021

Reassessment

4 weeks following the assessment board. Notified through E-vision

Submission will be electronic to the University blackboard site.

Feedback will be available on the E-feedback system approximately 4 weeks after submission.

Any requests for an extension due to extenuating circumstances must be made no later than 2 weeks before the submission date.  Requests must be sent to student.services@bmihealthcare.co.uk using the appropriate form, which can be found on the University’s Blackboard page.

Evaluation Strategy

Module feedback is welcome and actively encouraged and the School of Health & Social Care and BMI Healthcare rely on student feedback as a key method of assuring and enhancing the quality of your learning and teaching experiences.  Your feedback is very important to us and we will invite you to give constructive feedback on the module.  This is undertaken via BMiLearn.

Indicative Resources

You are encouraged to utilise the University’s library resources on line as there are a vast range of e-books and on line journals that you can access at a distance with your University IT account.

The reading list is available on the blackboard site at Teesside University.

Clinical Competency Assessment Process

During the learning process you will be observed performing practical clinical skills and you will be required to provide supporting underpinning theory for your practice.  You will be assessed using the Benner grading system as set out below.

To be deemed competent you must achieve a level 3 on your final assessment.  Achievement of a pass at level 3 will necessitate a further assessment within 6 months to review attainment of level 4 competence.

Level of Achievement

ScoreDescription
0 Cannot perform this activity satisfactorily to participate in the clinical environment.
1 Can perform activity, but not without constant supervision and some assistance.
2 Can perform this activity satisfactorily, but requires some supervision and assistance.
3 Can perform this activity satisfactorily without assistance and/or supervision (conscious competence).
4 Can perform this activity satisfactorily without supervision or assistance with more than acceptable speed and quality of work (unconscious competence).
5 Can perform this activity satisfactorily with more than acceptable speed and quality and with initiative and adaptability to special problem situations.
6 Can perform this activity with more than acceptable speed and quality with initiative and adaptability and can lead others in performing this task.

Adapted from FEU Pickup Report – Competency Based Vocational Education (1987)

Participant Signature Sheet

Trainee SFA

The trainee SFA will be a Registered Nurse or Registered Operating Department Practitioner.  They will have gained a minimum of two years scrub experience and will have evidence of their continuing professional development, including completion of their scrub competencies. The trainee SFA will have full support from their line-manger and will have identified a suitable clinical supervisor and mentor.

Clinical Supervisor

This must be a consultant surgeon. 

Mentor

This must be a senior registered RN/ODP that has undergone a recognised training route to become a mentor.  This is either by an academic mentorship course or similar internal mentorship course. The mentor should be a surgical first assistant or be familiar with issues surrounding the roles of expanded practice.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Example Answer

The Role of the Surgical First Assistant: Competence, Evidence-Based Practice, and Professional Development in Modern Perioperative Care

Introduction

The role of the Surgical First Assistant (SFA) represents an advanced level of perioperative practice that requires a high degree of clinical competence, critical thinking, and professional accountability. Within modern surgical services, the SFA plays a key role in supporting the operating surgeon by providing technical assistance, maintaining patient safety, and ensuring smooth coordination within the surgical team. This role is increasingly important due to the complexity of surgical procedures, rising patient expectations, and the need for efficient theatre utilisation.

The Surgical First Assistant module at Level 6 is designed to develop practitioners who can integrate evidence-based knowledge with advanced clinical skills. It requires learners to critically reflect on their practice, demonstrate competency in surgical environments, and apply theoretical frameworks to real clinical situations. This essay explores the key competencies required for the SFA role, the importance of evidence-based practice, ethical and legal considerations, and the value of reflective practice in developing professional expertise.

The Evolving Role of the Surgical First Assistant

The SFA role has developed significantly over recent years as healthcare systems have become more complex. Traditionally, perioperative support was limited to basic assistance within theatre teams, but the modern SFA is now expected to take on expanded responsibilities, including tissue handling, wound management, haemostasis support, and assisting in exposure of the surgical field.

This evolution reflects wider changes in healthcare delivery, particularly the emphasis on multidisciplinary teamwork and patient-centred care. SFAs must therefore demonstrate not only technical ability but also strong communication skills and situational awareness. Effective collaboration with surgeons, anaesthetists, and theatre staff is essential to ensure safe surgical outcomes.

The ability to work within structured guidelines while adapting to dynamic surgical environments is a defining feature of competent SFA practice.

Competence and Clinical Decision-Making

Competence in the SFA role is assessed not only through technical performance but also through the ability to make sound clinical judgments. The Benner model of skill acquisition highlights the progression from novice to expert practice, where practitioners move from rule-based performance to intuitive decision-making based on experience.

At Level 6, learners are expected to demonstrate at least “conscious competence,” meaning they can perform procedures safely and independently while understanding the rationale behind each action. This includes maintaining sterility, anticipating surgical needs, and recognising potential complications during procedures.

Clinical decision-making is particularly important in high-pressure environments where rapid responses are required. For example, the SFA may need to assist in controlling unexpected bleeding or adapt instrument handling based on surgical progression. These decisions must always prioritise patient safety and be guided by evidence-based protocols.

Evidence-Based Practice in Surgical Assistance

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is central to modern healthcare delivery and forms a core requirement of the SFA role. It involves integrating clinical expertise with current research evidence and patient preferences to guide decision-making.

In perioperative care, EBP informs decisions such as wound closure techniques, infection prevention strategies, and instrument handling procedures. For example, research has shown that strict adherence to aseptic technique significantly reduces surgical site infections, reinforcing the importance of standardised protocols in theatre environments.

SFAs must remain up to date with clinical guidelines and professional standards issued by organisations such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). This ensures that practice remains safe, effective, and aligned with current research.

Critical engagement with literature also enables practitioners to question outdated practices and contribute to service improvement.

Ethical and Legal Considerations

The SFA role is governed by strict ethical and legal frameworks that ensure patient safety and professional accountability. Practitioners must adhere to principles such as informed consent, confidentiality, and duty of care.

Ethically, SFAs must respect patient dignity at all times, particularly in vulnerable perioperative settings where patients are unconscious and unable to advocate for themselves. This includes maintaining privacy, respecting cultural needs, and ensuring respectful communication within the theatre environment.

Legally, SFAs must operate within their scope of practice as defined by professional regulatory bodies such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) or Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). Any deviation from agreed competence levels can have serious legal and professional consequences.

Informed consent is particularly important in surgical practice. While the surgeon is responsible for obtaining consent, all team members must ensure that procedures align with the agreed plan and respect patient autonomy.

Teamwork and Communication in the Operating Theatre

Effective teamwork is essential in surgical environments where multiple professionals must coordinate actions in real time. The SFA acts as a key link between the surgical team members, ensuring communication is clear, timely, and accurate.

Poor communication in theatre settings is a known risk factor for surgical errors. Therefore, structured communication tools such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) are often used to improve clarity and reduce misunderstandings.

SFAs must also demonstrate situational awareness, anticipating the surgeon’s needs and responding appropriately without disrupting workflow. This requires not only technical skill but also interpersonal awareness and confidence.

Strong teamwork contributes directly to patient safety, efficiency in theatre time, and improved surgical outcomes.

Reflective Practice and Professional Development

Reflective practice is a fundamental component of the SFA module and broader healthcare development. It allows practitioners to critically evaluate their performance, identify areas for improvement, and develop action plans for future learning.

Models such as Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle support structured reflection by encouraging practitioners to examine what happened, how they felt, what was good or bad, and how they can improve. This process helps bridge the gap between theory and practice.

In the context of SFA training, reflection is particularly valuable for understanding clinical decisions made during surgical procedures. For example, reflecting on a situation where instrument handling could have been improved enables the practitioner to develop greater efficiency and confidence in future practice.

Continuous professional development (CPD) is also essential, as surgical techniques and technologies evolve rapidly. Engaging in CPD activities ensures that SFAs remain competent and aligned with best practice standards.

Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle is used throughout.

Yes, it is written at Level 6 with critical analysis and evidence-based discussion.

Yes, patient safety, teamwork, and evidence-based practice are central themes.

Yes, the structure works for most general or specialist surgical procedures.

Mark

Explained the SFA role clearly without overcomplicating it.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
James

Really helpful for understanding how to link theory to practice.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Steve

Straight to the point and easy to follow for a reflective assignment.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Hazel

Good balance between reflection, evidence, and clinical reality.

United Kingdom

★★★★★