Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

UK Based Company
Company Registration# 11483120
Address: International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom, E16 2DQ.

Julie is a 52 year old white British woman. She is the mother of Sasha, who is 21 years old and also white British and Lisa who is 13 years old and of dual heritage

Coursework 2:

It is mandatory that students contribute to this written group task as it is an assessed piece of  coursework. Not engaging with this work will automatically mean a failure of this module.

You will be divided into groups (by the Module Tutor) and will be asked to work with your group to contribute to this group task.  This task involves working collaboratively with your group to share and develop ideas, question opinions, challenge attitudes, and collaboratively create and present a risk assessment and management plan. Hyperlinks, images, or video content can be added to support the information. You can therefore create a useful resource and gain a sense of ownership of the final product and the process which adds to a sense of belonging to the online community

The word limit will be confirmed, and the assignment should include a wide range of source material in the form of a reference list.

GROUP TASK

Your task is to examine the case scenario, and to complete and present a risk assessment and management plan for ONE of the people in this scenario.

In order to do this, you will need to work as a group to research relevant literature, research, legislation, policies, procedures, professional roles, and responsibilities.

Your group discussions will focus on:

  1. Which risk assessment and management model you will choose to use, and why you consider this to be the most appropriate model.
  2. Having a critical understanding of the different types of abuse that individuals can face, and where and how they are defined.
  3. Which organisational policies/procedures you may need to consider when putting the risk assessment and management plan together?
  4. Analysing the interrelationship between social agencies and practitioners.
  5. Any legal implications/responsibilities/ethical dilemmas?
  6. Evidence that you are practicing in an anti-oppressive and integrative manner?

PLEASE NOTE:

The format of the risk assessment is up to you as a group. You can create your own template identifying risks and the subsequent actions to mitigate and manage the risks, or you can answer each of the following questions in turn. 

  • Who is at risk?
  • What are they at risk of?
  • Why is it a risk and what could happen?
  • What research is there to evidence the possible impact and effects of the risk?
  • What legislation applies?
  • How will you assess the risks?
  • What measures do you need to put in place to mitigate/minimize the risks?
  • Who will be responsible for doing this?
  • What is the interrelationship between the social agencies and practitioners?
  • What are the dilemmas and difficulties in balancing the rights and responsibilities of all involved?
  • How will you evaluate the risk management plan?

Summative Assignment Case Study

This is the case study which you will use for your group task.

Julie is a 52 year old white British woman. She is the mother of Sasha, who is 21 years old and also white British and Lisa who is 13 years old and of dual heritage.  Sasha’s father died when she was 7 years of age as a result of a road traffic accident.

A year later Julie met Boryz, a Polish builder at the local pub and they started dating. Early on into the relationship Julie found out she was pregnant with Lisa. Boryz initially wanted her to get rid of the baby, but Julie insisted that she keep her. After some time, Boryz came round to the idea and subsequently moved into the family home. At first the relationship between Julie and Boryz was good, with Sasha having happy memories of going on outings and picnics. She recalls some arguments, but nothing significant until Boryz failed to find work some years later. During this time the relationship began to deteriorate, with Boryz drinking heavily and blaming Julie for ‘trapping’ him by having a baby. The arguments often became violent with Boryz hitting Julie. Although neither Sasha nor Lisa witnessed this, they could hear the arguing and their mother crying afterwards. Sasha and Lisa became very close as a result.

Boryz finally left the family home and returned to Poland when Lisa disclosed the violence to a teacher at school. This was two years ago. Since then Julie has suffered from depression and has blamed Lisa for causing Boryz to leave her. She feels that Lisa has ruined her life. Julie has begun drinking alcohol heavily and after one bout told Sasha that her father was probably not her dad, but she was the result of Julie being raped, something she has never told anyone. Sasha is struggling to deal with this and her mother’s moods and alcohol use, and is thinking of moving out.

Last week during a PE session, the teacher noticed that Lisa had scarring at the top of her thighs. When questioned about this Lisa had broken down and said that she did it because it helped her. She said that her sister Sasha was planning to move out of the family home and that she would have no one left. Lisa also said that her mother hated her and because of this she felt that life was no longer worth living.

The school have rung the local children’s services with their concerns about Lisa.

The marking criteria for this coursework considers the following:

1) Application of legal frameworks – duties and responsibilities.

2) Knowledge of policies and procedures.

3) Critical understanding of abuse, risk, and vulnerability.

4) Inclusion of theoretical perspectives in understanding abuse.

5) Understanding of risk assessment and management processes (different frameworks/approaches to undertaking an assessment).

6) Awareness of professional roles and responsibilities.

7) Analysis of the interrelationship between social agencies and practitioners.

8) Balancing rights v risk taking and empowerment.

9) Use of a wide range of relevant literature and research findings. 

10) Accurate referencing.

Your work will be marked based on the rubric below:

Assessment Rubric

Level 6 

Rubric 

Exceptional 

(100-80) 

Excellent 

(79-70) 

Very Good 

(69-60) 

Good 
(59-50) 

Satisfactory 

(49-40) 

Unsatisfactory 

(39-35) 

Poor 

(34-21) 

Very Poor 
(20-0) 

Critical Analysis

and Evaluation 

(25%) 

Exceptional level of critical analysis & evaluation 

A high level of critical analysis & evaluation 

A very good level of critical

analysis & evaluation 

A good level of critical analysis & evaluation 

A fair level of critical analysis & evaluation 

Lack of critical analysis and evaluation 

Significant lack of critical analysis & evaluation 

Very significant lack of critical analysis & evaluation 

Originality of Ideas 

(10%) 

Exceptional 

originality of ideas 

A high level of originality in ideas 

Significant originality

of ideas 

Good originality of ideas 

Some originality of ideas 

Lack of originality of ideas 

Lack of evidence of originality of ideas 

Very significant lack of evidence of originality of ideas 

Research Informed 

(20%) 

Exceptional 

well researched 

Very well researched 

Well researched 

Quite well researched 

Adequately researched 

A lack of research evidence 

Significant lack of research evidence 

Very significant lack of research evidence 

Knowledge and

Understanding of Area 

(25%) 

 

Exceptional 

Knowledge; trivial errors 

A high level of knowledge; trivial and minor errors 

Very good knowledge and understanding demonstrated 

Good knowledge and understanding demonstrated 

Sufficient knowledge and understanding demonstrated  

Misunderstandings and errors in knowledge and understanding 

Significant lack of knowledge & understanding 

Very significant lack of knowledge & understanding 

Clarity and

Coherence 
inc. structure and logical flow 

(10%) 

Exceptional 

clarity of ideas; excellent coherence & logic 

A high level of clarity of ideas coherence & logic 

Overall, the work is

clear & coherent 

Generally clear & coherent 

Fairly clear & coherent 

Work lacks some clarity & coherence 

Poor clarity & coherence to work 

Very poor clarity & coherence 

Presentation 
inc. grammar, spelling and referencing 

(10%) 

 

Exceptional 

presentation 

High quality presentation 

A very good standard of presentation 

A good standard of presentation 

Acceptable standard of presentation 

Presentation requires improvement 

Significantly requires improvement 

Very significantly requires improvement 

Anonymous Marking

Submissions in Turnitin and Blackboard

You must submit your work using your student number to identify yourself, not your name. You must not use your name in the text of the work at any point. When you submit your work in Turnitin you must submit your student number within the assignment document and in the Submission title field in Turnitin.

Assessment Regulations

The University’s regulations, policies and procedures for students define the framework within which teaching and assessment are conducted. Please make sure you are familiar with the


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions
paypal checkout

The services provided by Assignment Experts UK are 100% original and custom written. We never use any paraphrasing tool, any software to generate content for e.g. Chat GPT and all other content writing tools. We ensure that the work produced by our writers is self-written and 100% plagiarism-free.

Discover more


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guaranteed

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

We've produced some samples of what you can expect from our Academic Writing Service - these are created by our writers to show you the kind of high-quality work you'll receive. Take a look for yourself!

View Our Samples

We're Open