Custom-Written, AI-Free & Plagiarism-Free Academic Work by Assignment Experts

Assignment Experts UK is a trading name of AKOSZ TEC LTD (Company No. 11483120). View on Companies House

Acting as a business consultant, evaluate the business environment for your sneakers company in order to analyse gaps between desired and actual performance.

Assignment Brief

Acting as a business consultant, evaluate the business environment for your sneakers company in order to analyse gaps between desired and actual performance. Using the Ansoff Matrix, make recommendations for the business’s future strategy identifying how the business will achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

Michael Porter’s five forces framework

Threat of entry

  • How easy is it to enter the industry?

  • Barriers to entry are factors that discourage new entrants, including:

    • economies of scale

    • high investment requirements

    • experience

    • access to supply or distribution channels

    • expected retaliation

    • legislation or government action

    • differentiation

Threat of substitutes

Substitutes are products or services that offer a similar benefit to an industry’s products or services.

  • Important even if it is more expensive when it is considered a ‘better’ product or service

  • Substitutes can come from outside the industry

Power of buyers

Buyers: the organisation’s immediate customers. Powerful buyers can demand cheaper prices or product/service improvements either are likely to reduce profits.

Buyers are powerful when:

  • there are a few large customers making up the majority of sales

  • if a product or service accounts for a high percentage of the buyers’ total purchases – they will be more likely to ‘shop around’

  • where it is easy for buyers to switch from one supplier to another

  • if the buyer can supply itself (backward vertical integration

Power of suppliers

Suppliers: those who supply the organisation with what it needs to produce the product or service.

Suppliers are powerful when:

  • there are a few large producers who make up the majority of supply

  • where it is expensive or disruptive to switch from one supplier to another

  • if the supplier can cut out middlemen buyers (forward vertical integration)

With many suppliers, analysis should concentrate on the most important ones.

Competitive rivalry

The other four forces directly impact on the competitive rivalry between an organisation and it most immediate rivals. Rivals are organisations with similar products and services aimed at the same customer group.

In addition to the four forces, there are further factors that affect the extent to which organisations will face more competition:

  • where competitors are approximately the same size they are likely to jockey for position

  • where the industry is growing only slowly or is in decline, any growth in one firm’s sales will likely be at the expense of another firm’s sales (compare five forces to industry life cycle)

  • industries with high fixed costs (investment in equipment/research & development) or where extra capacity can only be added in large increments

  • high exit barriers e.g. high redundancy costs, high investment in industry-specific assets

  • low differentiation, where a customer cannot easily distinguish one firm’s product or service from another firm’s product or service

Analysing an industry using Porter’s five forces framework should allow a judgement to be reached about how attractive an industry is to compete in. Based on such analysis, informed decisions can be made on which industries to enter or leave; strategies can be formulated on how the five forces can be influenced; competitors can be identified as more or less vulnerable to the five forces. Consideration needs to be given to the level of analysis – is it the industry as a whole that is of interest, which markets, which market segments; the boundaries of an industry change – some converge, others diverge; perhaps organisations that are complementors as well as competitors should be considered.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions

Sample Answer

Evaluating the Business Environment of a Sneakers Company and Strategic Direction

Introduction

This report evaluates the business environment of a sneakers company from the perspective of a business consultant. The aim is to identify the gap between current performance and desired strategic outcomes, using Michael Porter’s Five Forces framework to understand industry dynamics. Based on this evaluation, the Ansoff Matrix is applied to recommend future growth strategies that can help the company achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.

The global sneakers market is highly competitive, driven by fast-changing consumer preferences, strong branding, and continuous innovation. Companies must not only compete on product quality but also on brand identity, pricing, and customer experience. This makes strategic positioning essential.

Analysis of the Business Environment Using Porter’s Five Forces

Threat of New Entrants

The threat of new entrants in the sneakers industry is moderate to low. While starting a small footwear brand is relatively easy, competing at scale is difficult. Established brands benefit from economies of scale, allowing them to produce at lower costs and dominate pricing strategies.

High investment requirements in marketing, research, and supply chain infrastructure create strong entry barriers. New entrants also lack brand recognition, which is crucial in a market where consumers are heavily influenced by branding and social identity. In addition, established firms have strong distribution networks and long-standing relationships with suppliers and retailers, making it difficult for new firms to gain access.

However, the rise of e-commerce and social media marketing has slightly reduced entry barriers, allowing niche brands to emerge and target specific segments.

Threat of Substitutes

The threat of substitutes is relatively high. Sneakers compete not only with other footwear brands but also with alternative products such as sandals, formal shoes, and even second-hand or sustainable footwear options.

Consumers may also shift towards lifestyle changes, such as minimalism or sustainability, which can influence purchasing decisions. For example, environmentally conscious consumers may prefer eco-friendly footwear brands, even if they are more expensive.

The presence of substitutes forces sneakers companies to continuously innovate and differentiate their products, whether through design, comfort, or brand storytelling.

Power of Buyers

Buyers in the sneakers market have significant power. This is mainly because there are many competing brands offering similar products, making it easy for customers to switch between options.

Online platforms have increased price transparency, allowing consumers to compare products instantly. If customers feel that a product does not offer value for money, they can quickly move to competitors.

Large retail partners, such as global sports retailers, also have strong bargaining power. They can demand better pricing or exclusive product lines, which can reduce profit margins for manufacturers.

To reduce buyer power, companies must focus on brand loyalty, unique product offerings, and customer experience.

Power of Suppliers

Supplier power in the sneakers industry varies but can be moderate. Large brands often outsource manufacturing to suppliers in countries with lower production costs. If there are limited high-quality suppliers, their power increases.

Switching suppliers can be costly and disruptive, especially when it involves quality control and production timelines. In some cases, suppliers may also have the capability to move forward in the value chain, producing their own branded products.

To manage supplier power, companies often diversify their supplier base and build long-term partnerships to ensure stability and cost efficiency.

Competitive Rivalry

Competitive rivalry in the sneakers industry is extremely high. The market is dominated by major global brands, but there is also strong competition from emerging niche brands.

Products are often similar in function, which increases competition based on branding, pricing, and innovation. Companies invest heavily in marketing campaigns, celebrity endorsements, and product launches to stand out.

The industry also has high fixed costs, particularly in design, marketing, and production, which increases pressure to maintain sales volume. Slow market growth in certain regions further intensifies competition, as companies compete for market share rather than benefiting from overall market expansion.

Gap Analysis: Desired vs Actual Performance

The desired performance for the sneakers company is to achieve strong brand recognition, consistent revenue growth, and a loyal customer base. However, the actual performance may reveal several gaps.

One key gap is limited brand differentiation. If the company offers products that are too similar to competitors, it becomes difficult to justify premium pricing. Another gap may exist in digital presence, where the company fails to fully utilise online channels for marketing and sales.

There may also be operational inefficiencies, such as reliance on a small number of suppliers or lack of innovation in product development. These gaps prevent the company from achieving sustainable growth and long-term competitiveness.

It helps you understand the competitive environment and what pressures the business is facing before making strategic decisions.

Market penetration is usually the easiest because it focuses on selling more within existing markets.

Because the products are often similar, branding is what makes customers choose one over another.

Standing out in a crowded market where customers have many choices.

Sophie

Got a first on this, not even joking. The analysis part was exactly what my tutor wanted.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Rachel

Super clear and easy to follow. Didn’t feel like a boring essay at all.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Arthur

Saved me loads of time. Properly structured and actually made sense when I read it.

United Kingdom

★★★★★
Ollie

My lecturer said it showed strong critical thinking. Couldn’t have done it like this myself honestly.

United Kingdom

★★★★★