Sample Answer
Legal Advisory Report for Cocineros Construction Ltd
Introduction
This report offers practical legal advice to Cocineros Construction Ltd regarding several disputes that have emerged with the client, Witherspoon. The purpose is to clarify Cocineros Construction Ltd’s legal position, outline the likely risks, and identify the most reasonable routes forward. Although construction disputes can vary widely, most disagreements fall into familiar categories such as delays, payment issues, variations, defective work claims and breaches of contract. The discussion here focuses on these areas using principles drawn from UK construction law and common forms of contract such as JCT and NEC, which are widely used across the industry.
The report sets out the relevant legal considerations, applies them to the disputes, and suggests recommended actions that protect Cocineros Construction Ltd’s interests while maintaining a practical approach that avoids unnecessary litigation.
Understanding the Contractual Framework
Any construction dispute begins with the contract. In most UK construction projects, the contract outlines duties relating to completion dates, variations, payment schedules, quality standards and dispute resolution procedures. Courts generally expect both parties to follow these agreed processes before escalating the matter further. If Cocineros Construction Ltd operates under a JCT contract, the rights surrounding extensions of time, variations and valuations are relatively structured. If the agreement follows an NEC contract, duties around early warnings and risk management become more significant.
Before taking action, Cocineros Construction Ltd must ensure that every clause related to these dispute areas has been reviewed. This includes payment clauses under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, which provides statutory rights related to interim payments and adjudication.
Key Dispute Issues and Legal Position
Alleged Delays and Extension of Time
If Witherspoon claims that the project was completed late, Cocineros Construction Ltd must determine whether the delays were caused by:
-
Client changes
-
Late information or approvals
-
Design amendments
-
Unforeseen site conditions
-
Weather events that meet the contract definition of exceptional
If delays were caused by any of these, Cocineros Construction Ltd is usually entitled to an extension of time. Under JCT rules, a valid extension of time prevents the client from applying liquidated damages. Under NEC rules, early warning notices and compensation events are even more central.
If Cocineros Construction Ltd notified delays on time and kept good records, the company is in a strong position. If notices were late or incomplete, the client may attempt to argue that the contractor caused the delays. Even then, detailed site diaries and email records can improve the contractor’s defence.
Advice: Prepare a delay analysis that distinguishes between contractor delay and client delay. Submit or update extension of time applications. Make sure all critical path impacts are clearly documented.
Disputed Variations
In many construction disputes, clients deny payment for variations they verbally approved. Under UK construction law, a variation is payable if:
-
The client instructed it.
-
It was necessary for the project to meet design standards.
-
It was carried out with the client’s knowledge and without objection.
Even if a variation was not formally approved, the contractor can sometimes recover the cost under the principle of quantum meruit, which allows fair payment for work done.
If Witherspoon approved changes in emails or on site, even casually, this strengthens Cocineros Construction Ltd’s claim.
Advice: Gather any evidence of client instructions, including site meeting minutes, email confirmations and drawings. Submit a detailed variation valuation with labour, materials and time implications clearly shown.
Payment Disputes and Underpayment
If Witherspoon has withheld payment, Cocineros Construction Ltd must check whether the correct payment notices were served. Under the Construction Act 1996:
-
The payer must issue a payment notice.
-
If they intend to pay less, they must issue a pay less notice.
-
If they fail to do this, the contractor can claim the full amount applied for.
If Witherspoon failed to serve a valid pay less notice, Cocineros Construction Ltd can demand full payment and escalate to adjudication if needed.
Advice: Review every payment application and notice. If the client failed to meet statutory deadlines, initiate adjudication to recover the outstanding amount.
