Discuss the meaning of Whatever is, is right, from Epistle 1 of Popes An Essay on Man

Assignment Brief

Write a critical essay on one of the prompts below. Be sure it is evident in your writing which topic you have chosen. It is easy to do something other than what you are asked to do, so be sure to stick to the topic provided. If the topic says, “chapter 5 of Frederick Douglass`s narrative,” then that is what you need to focus on.

Sample Answer

A Critical Reflection on Pope’s Optimism in An Essay on Man

In Epistle 1 of An Essay on Man, Alexander Pope famously concludes with the line, "Whatever is, is right." This statement has sparked much debate over the centuries, with some viewing it as a powerful expression of philosophical optimism, while others criticise it as overly simplistic or blind to the suffering present in the world. To understand the full meaning of this phrase, it is necessary to explore Pope’s context, purpose, and the philosophical influences behind his writing.

Pope’s An Essay on Man was published in 1733–34, during the Enlightenment, a period when writers and thinkers were exploring ideas about human nature, reason, and divine order. Pope, drawing from the rational deism of philosophers such as Leibniz, sought to explain the world as a perfectly ordered creation, made by a benevolent God. According to this view, every part of creation, including suffering and imperfection, fits into a larger divine plan that is ultimately good, even if human beings cannot always see or understand it.

When Pope writes "Whatever is, is right," he suggests that everything in the universe, no matter how difficult or unjust it may seem to us, happens according to God’s perfect plan. This belief is grounded in the idea that human beings, with limited perspective and knowledge, are not in a position to judge the fairness of the world. Instead, we should accept our place in the natural order and trust that things happen for a reason beyond our understanding.

However, Pope does not claim that individual events are always good in themselves. Rather, he implies that what appears to be evil or unfair on a small scale may serve a higher purpose when seen in the context of the whole. For example, death, disease, or natural disasters might seem cruel, but they may contribute to a greater balance in nature or humanity’s moral development. This reflects a theological version of determinism, where divine wisdom ensures that all outcomes are part of a larger good.

Critics argue that this viewpoint can be dangerous or dismissive. Philosophers such as Voltaire mocked Pope’s optimism, especially in light of tragedies like the Lisbon earthquake of 1755, which killed thousands. To them, saying “Whatever is, is right” ignores human responsibility and excuses injustice. For instance, it could be wrongly used to justify slavery, war, or poverty as somehow “necessary” or “good,” rather than problems to be addressed.

Despite these criticisms, Pope’s idea still invites reflection on the limits of human knowledge. It encourages humility and suggests that striving to understand life’s challenges with patience and faith might bring peace. At the same time, readers today must approach such claims with caution and not use them to deny the need for justice and social progress.

Continued...