Demonstrate a systematic knowledge and understanding of different models of service provision for children and young people who offend and the theoretical rationales associated with them.
Assignment Brief
ASS015-6 Youth justice current issues and critical perspectives
The syllabus for the unit aims to equip students to:
- Critically engage with advanced level debates in on a range of areas relevant to the treatment of children in trouble with the criminal law
- Discuss and reflect on the relevance of different sorts of research evidence to youth justice policy and practice
- Develop a theoretically informed understanding of the origins of youth justice systems, their history and current trajectory
- Critically appraise current policy and practice in England and Wales, and other jurisdictions, in the light of that evidence
Core Learning Outcomes
On completion of this unit, students should be able to:
- Demonstrate a systematic knowledge and understanding of different models of service provision for children and young people who offend and the theoretical rationales associated with them. This will be assessed through assignment 1
- Interrogate critically the various rationales underpinning contemporary youth justice policy and practice in the light of the evidence base. This will be assessed through assignments 1 and 2.
Sample Answer
Current Issues and Critical Perspectives in Youth Justice Policy and Practice in England and Wales
Introduction
Youth justice refers to the system of laws, policies, and practices that address young people who come into conflict with the criminal law. In England and Wales, this area has been shaped by historical shifts, theoretical models, and political developments that continue to influence policy and practice. This essay will critically engage with debates surrounding youth justice, examine the historical origins and development of the system, assess different models of service provision, and evaluate contemporary policies in light of evidence-based research and theoretical frameworks.
Origins and Theoretical Foundations of Youth Justice
The youth justice system in England and Wales has its roots in the 19th century, when concerns about juvenile delinquency led to the development of separate legal provisions for children. The introduction of the Juvenile Courts Act 1908 marked a shift from punishment to rehabilitation. This was underpinned by the welfare model, which viewed offending as a symptom of broader social problems requiring intervention and support rather than punishment.
Theoretical rationales that inform youth justice policy include positivist theories, which stress individual pathology and the need for treatment; labelling theory, which emphasises the consequences of social reaction and criminalisation; and critical criminology, which critiques structural inequalities and state control. More recent frameworks such as restorative justice and child-friendly justice stress participation, rights, and relational repair over punitive measures.
Current Trajectory of Youth Justice in England and Wales
Since the 1990s, youth justice policy in England and Wales has moved towards a more punitive approach. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 introduced the Youth Justice Board (YJB) and Youth Offending Teams (YOTs), and focused on early intervention and prevention. However, the system retained a strong emphasis on risk and control, reflected in tools like the Asset assessment framework.
The ‘New Labour’ era stressed tough-on-crime rhetoric but also promoted initiatives like the Every Child Matters agenda. In recent years, policy has shifted again towards a more child-focused approach. The 2016 Charlie Taylor Review advocated for reform based on education, rehabilitation, and smaller custodial settings.
Despite this, critics argue that the system remains overly punitive, particularly for marginalised groups. Research shows that Black and minority ethnic (BAME) children are disproportionately represented at every stage of the youth justice system (YJB, 2021). Additionally, children in care are more likely to be criminalised for behaviour that would not warrant police involvement in other settings.
Continued...
