AC 1.1 Explain the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values
MARK SHEET – Developing Critical Thinking
Centre Number:
|
078781
|
Centre Name
|
ICS Learn
|
Learner Registration No:
|
|
Learner Name
|
|
- Learner named above confirms authenticity of submission.
- ILM uses learners’ submissions – on an anonymous basis – for assessment standardisation. By submitting, I agree that ILM may use this script on condition that all information which may identify me is removed.
However, if you are unwilling to allow ILM use your script, please refuse by ticking the box: □
Learning Outcome 1: Be able to critically assess own beliefs, attitudes and value systems
|
Assessment Criteria (AC)
|
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
|
AC 1.1 Explain the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values
|
Referral
|
Pass
|
Good Pass
|
Beliefs, attitudes and values are merely listed or individually defined or described
There is no explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values, or the explanation is incorrect, or there is no explanation of the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values
|
There is a limited but sufficient and correct explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values and the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values
|
There is a comprehensive explanation of the difference between beliefs, attitudes and values and the cognitive structure of beliefs, attitudes and values using appropriate theoretical models
|
Assessor feedback on AC
|
|
PASS / REFERRAL
|
AC 1.2
Critically assess the impact of beliefs, attitudes and values on own behaviour
|
Referral
|
Pass
|
Good Pass
|
No impact on behaviour is provided, or the impact is merely listed or described rather than critically assessed, or the impact is not evidenced as being attributable to beliefs, attitudes and values
|
How beliefs, attitudes and values impact on own behaviour is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a limited but sufficient judgement
|
How beliefs, attitudes and values impact on own behaviour is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a detailed judgement
|
Assessor feedback on AC
|
|
PASS / REFERRAL
|
Learning Outcome 2: Be able to critically assess the validity of management theories in relation to own beliefs, attitudes and values
|
Assessment Criteria (AC)
|
Sufficiency Descriptors [Typical standard that, if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]
|
AC 2.1
Identify management theories relevant to your role
|
Referral
|
Pass
|
Good Pass
|
Management theories are not identified, or are not identified correctly, or are not identified as being relevant to own role, but the assessment is inappropriate or minimal
|
Management theories are identified correctly, although why they are relevant to your role is imprecise
|
Management theories are identified correctly and precisely evidenced as being relevant to own role
|
Assessor feedback on AC
|
|
PASS / REFERRAL
|
AC 2.2
Critically assess the impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory relevant to your role
|
Referral
|
Pass
|
Good Pass
|
The impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory relevant to your role is not provided, or is incorrect, or is listed or described rather than critically assessed
|
The impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory relevant to your role is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a limited but sufficient judgement that is evidenced by examples from the workplace
|
The impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory relevant to your role is critically assessed using a relevant theoretical model(s) or technique(s) to make a detailed judgement that is evidenced by detailed examples from the workplace
|
Assessor feedback on AC
|
|
PASS / REFERRAL
|
AC 2.3
Use the critical assessment to evaluate how someone with different beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently
|
Referral
|
Pass
|
Good Pass
|
No evaluation as to how someone with different, beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently is provided, or is incorrect
The evaluation is insufficient as it is based on an inadequate critical assessment of the impact of own beliefs, attitudes and values on a management theory
|
The critical assessment and judgement is used to evaluate and reach a limited but sufficient conclusion as to how someone with different, beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently
|
The critical assessment and judgement is used to evaluate and reach a detailed conclusion that is evidenced by examples from the workplace as to how someone with different, beliefs, attitudes and values might interpret the theory differently
|
Assessor feedback on AC
|
|
PASS / REFERRAL
|
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
tailored to your instructions