Demonstrate how Montaigne attempts to overcome the difficulty of achieving total self-knowledge

Assignment Brief

Montaigne’s Essays illuminate the difficulty of achieving total self-knowledge, and/or self-mastery. In an organized essay demonstrate how Montaigne attempts to overcome this difficulty.

Be sure to support your argument with cogent analysis of specific examples from all relevant texts. Papers that rely on opinions or generalizations will automatically receive a failing grade.

Sample Answer

Montaigne’s Essays and the Difficulty of Self-Knowledge

Michel de Montaigne’s Essays represent one of the earliest and most influential explorations of the self in Western literature. At their core, the Essays reveal the paradox of attempting to know and master oneself while acknowledging the limits of human reason, memory, and consistency. Montaigne persistently wrestles with the idea that human beings are changeable and contradictory, which makes total self-knowledge almost impossible. Yet, rather than abandon the task, Montaigne develops strategies, literary, philosophical, and reflective, that allow him to approach greater self-understanding, even if mastery remains elusive.

The Challenge of Self-Knowledge

Montaigne openly admits that the self is unstable, declaring, “I cannot fix my object; it goes along befuddled and staggering, with a natural drunkenness.” This image captures the fluidity of human identity. Because moods, thoughts, and perspectives constantly shift, Montaigne recognizes that self-knowledge cannot be reduced to a fixed formula. Moreover, he critiques human arrogance in believing reason alone grants full mastery, pointing to the limits of memory, the influence of habit, and the sway of passions.

Writing as a Tool of Self-Examination

One of Montaigne’s chief methods of overcoming this difficulty is the act of writing itself. The Essays are not polished demonstrations of mastery but ongoing attempts at self-examination. By recording his thoughts as they come, contradictory, provisional, and at times meandering, Montaigne creates a mirror of the self in motion. For instance, in “On Repentance,” he acknowledges his inconsistency yet embraces writing as a way of presenting himself “entirely naked,” flaws included. Writing thus becomes less about achieving a final self-portrait and more about documenting the process of becoming.

The Use of Contradiction and Digression

Montaigne further overcomes the challenge of self-knowledge by refusing to smooth out contradictions. He often sets opposing perspectives side by side, such as in “On Experience,” where he balances skepticism about abstract knowledge with trust in personal observation. By doing so, he acknowledges that self-understanding must include complexity and paradox rather than impose false coherence. His digressions, too, show that thought itself is non-linear, and self-knowledge requires openness to discovery rather than rigid structure.

Continued...