Understanding Epidemiology and Statistics Change
Assignment Brief
- What has challenged and what has surprised you during Epidemiology introduction week? How your understanding of epidemiology and statistics has changed in light of your studies? (250 words).
- How do you think knowledge of inferential statistics will aid your practice in Global Public Health ? What is difficult while studying inferential statistics and how will you overcome this difficulties?(250words)
- What is interesting about learning epidemiological research designs and why?
- How the knowledge about critical appraisal impact study , research and practice in Global Public Health? (250 words)
- Why is having and understanding in regression important in Public Health Practice ? What was difficult and how did you overcome the difficulties while studying it? (250 words).
- What have you learnt about screening and its benefits ? How far do you think RCT’s are the gold standard in terms of epidemiological research and what are your views on RCTs? (250 words)
- What is nature of evidence? Is evidence more problematic than you previously thought? Why is understanding of nature of evidence is important for epidemiological studies? (250 words)
Sample Answer
Reflections on Epidemiology Introduction Week
The first week of epidemiology proved both challenging and surprising. One of the biggest challenges was engaging with the mathematical and statistical components of the subject. Initially, the formulas and probability concepts seemed abstract, making it difficult to connect them directly to real-world health outcomes. What surprised me, however, was how relevant and practical these methods are once applied to actual case studies, such as understanding disease outbreaks or evaluating vaccination strategies. My understanding of epidemiology has shifted from viewing it as purely theoretical to recognising it as a discipline that underpins all evidence-based decision-making in public health. I also realised that statistics is not simply about numbers but about interpreting patterns that can save lives. This week has therefore reshaped my perspective: epidemiology is not an isolated field but one that integrates science, mathematics, and human behaviour to improve health outcomes on a large scale.
The Role of Inferential Statistics in Global Public Health
Knowledge of inferential statistics is essential in global public health because it allows professionals to draw valid conclusions from data samples and generalise findings to larger populations. For instance, when evaluating the effectiveness of a malaria prevention programme, inferential methods can help determine whether results are statistically significant or due to chance. This strengthens credibility when influencing policy or seeking funding. The difficulty lies in mastering the technical side of inferential tests, such as understanding assumptions behind t-tests, chi-square, or regression models. The terminology can be overwhelming at first. To overcome these difficulties, I plan to combine consistent practice with real-world examples, use visual aids like graphs to interpret results, and consult with peers and tutors. This approach will make the subject less intimidating and help embed the learning. Ultimately, inferential statistics will enable me to analyse health inequalities, assess intervention impact, and advocate for evidence-based global health policies.
Learning Epidemiological Research Designs
One of the most interesting aspects of learning epidemiological research designs is realising how each design answers different types of public health questions. Cross-sectional studies provide quick snapshots of health conditions, while cohort and case-control studies allow for a deeper exploration of causes and risk factors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are fascinating because they demonstrate causality with strong reliability. What makes research design engaging is its practical application: by choosing the right design, researchers can generate meaningful evidence to guide interventions. For example, during COVID-19, cohort studies helped understand long-term impacts, while RCTs tested vaccine effectiveness. Learning about research designs has deepened my appreciation of how complex but necessary it is to balance validity, feasibility, and ethics.
Critical Appraisal in Global Public Health
Critical appraisal is vital in global public health because it equips practitioners to assess the reliability and relevance of research evidence before applying it to practice. Without appraisal, flawed studies could mislead decision-making and potentially harm populations. For instance, studies with small sample sizes or poor methodology can exaggerate the effectiveness of an intervention. Through critical appraisal, I have learned to question not only results but also the quality of study design, sampling, and data interpretation. This impacts my study and practice by making me more cautious and evidence-driven. It also supports global health, where interventions are often implemented in resource-limited settings and must be based on trustworthy data. The skill enhances my research ability by ensuring that I can filter evidence for systematic reviews or policy recommendations. Overall, it encourages intellectual discipline, scepticism, and responsibility in using evidence for improving population health.
Continued...
